[mbd2884]

Quote:

Originally Posted by yourstruly /img/forum/go_quote.gif To the OP: Keep in mind that headphones are meant to be worn on human heads. Some headphones, like the HD800's, are very beautiful when seen on a stand. But it's impressive in the same way that say, a spaceship would be impressive. Just because it looks nice viewed on display doesn't mean it'll look good on your head. With that said, here's another one of the most gorgeous headphones ever made, the Grado Sr325:

Here is for some subjective views. IMO one of the ugliest headphones concieved, more like a head torture device from the dark ages. Sweet, it's a witch, torture her with a Grado! Feel the pain you abomination! Rub those foam into her ears until they bleed!

 

[Bengt77]

Other than for the AD900 and A900Ti, I can't comment on how they sound, but I'd say, in no particular order:

• ATH-W2002
• ATH-L3000/ATH-L3000G
• ATH-ESW10JPN
• ATH-W11JPN
• ATH-W5000
• ATH-AD900
• ATH-ESW9
• ATH-ES7
• ATH-A900Ti
• ATH-ON3
• K702
• HD 580 Jubilee
• HD 595
• HD 555
• AH-D7000
• AH-D5000
• Qualia 010 (blue)
• SRS-007ii
• SE530

and of course

• Ti HF78SKC29

 

[XXII]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Darek /img/forum/go_quote.gif is the girl in the last pic ryoko hirosue ?

no

 

[Bengt77]

Quote:

Originally Posted by XXII /img/forum/go_quote.gif no

And nor is the headphone she's wearing an ATH-ES7.

 

[Darek]

Quote:

Originally Posted by XXII /img/forum/go_quote.gif no

ahh.. thanks

 

[haloxt]

The edition 8 looks really amazing to me but I'm sure opinion is very different because it does look like a luxury car ripoff. Luckily my pro 900's look like $50 headphones, looks cheaper than the HFI's, less likely to get robbed ^^.

 

[yourstruly]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bengt77 /img/forum/go_quote.gif And nor is the headphone she's wearing an ATH-ES7.

You mean the picture I posted?

What makes you think that?

 

[RCGA]

I love the look of these, just not the sound of them

 

[Bengt77]

Quote:

Originally Posted by yourstruly /img/forum/go_quote.gif You mean the picture I posted? What makes you think that?

The girl in your last picture isn't wearing an ATH-ES7. I mean this picture:

She's wearing an ATH-SJ1.

 

[yourstruly]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bengt77 /img/forum/go_quote.gif The girl in your last picture isn't wearing an ATH-ES7. I mean this picture: She's wearing an ATH-SJ1.

Ah yeah, you're right. I got the picture off of pchome:
²»Ðâ¸Ö¾µÃ湤ÒÕ ÌúÈý½ÇES7Öж˶ú»ú_ÐìÖݶú»ú_¶ú»ú_¶ú»ú_PChomeµçÄÔÖ®¼ Ò

Funny that they mislabeled it.

 

[LarsP]

Omega II's;

 

[JGood]

AKG K701, and to a slightly lesser extend the K702, even though the detachable cable makes them much better functionally. I'm planning on picking up a pair of 702s before I go back to school...

 

[El_Doug]

HOW COULD WE FORGET THE DARTH BOOBIES!?!?

 

[paaj]

Quote:

Originally Posted by mbd2884 /img/forum/go_quote.gif Here is for some subjective views. IMO one of the ugliest headphones concieved, more like a head torture device from the dark ages. Sweet, it's a witch, torture her with a Grado! Feel the pain you abomination! Rub those foam into her ears until they bleed!

aesthetic is not about comfort, otherwise the es7 would fail even faster.

^ don't like the darth thingies at all! too rounded, no edges, and the curves are not particularly pretty either: they are just not exciting to look at.

 

[JAChichorro]

I love how the HD650/600/580 look, except the standard 580 grills.