- Joined
- Jun 22, 2001
- Posts
- 4,111
- Likes
- 1,336
So, here's the story on the new 2006 AirHead as best I can tell it:
The AirHead is our attempt to bring high quality headphone amplification to the masses. I see it as good design,, in high quality parts, in a durable plastic enclosure, as cheap as we can, so that people can make buying good headphones worth while.
So far, I think we must have revved the AirHead about seven times, at least. When our first AirHead came out a portable CD player was the portable player of choice---and there were some choice portable players back then. Today is another age where iPods and laptops roam the earth; and Xinful Hornets buzz feverously everywhere. It's been a bitch keeping the Airhead any where near current.
(I'd kindfully ask those of you with previous editions of the AirHead to post pix as you see fit for everyone's enlightenment.)
We've struggled with the AirHead, but by and large I think we've always delivered a quality and fully featured product (bags and USB) for it's day and age, at a price where both customer and HeadRoom benefited. In fact, USB and bag integration is STILL only done by us in any meaningful way. But even in bags, the size, shape, and use paradigm of portable players was/is still changing so rapidly that our whole current bag paradigm may be hopelessly out of date. Lastly, the price of the amp is still too high for broad market acceptance. The bottom line problem was: it cost a lot to do it by hand.
What to do?
The first question is rev it, or redesign it? (This may be the last time I mention it in public so pay attention.) If that's the first question then the second question is: how much better can you make it if your redesign it? The answer is a whole lot better. You could make them small and thin and with rechargeable batteries. You could even make real tiny ones that ran of USB for laptops. But it will take years to do well.
Well, how much better could you make it if you wanted to do it quickly? Not so surprisingly if you think about it, quite a bit. As long as we didn't change the enclosure and live with the current use paradigm (which though not optimal, is still workable) we could: redesign the amp with the AD8397 and sound quality equivalent with the current market of manufactured and DIY portable amps; we could improve the cross-feed based on what we learned from our new electronics in our high-end lines; we could add a gain switch feature and get better performance with both high and low impedance headphones; and, maybe most importantly, we could outsource our board manufacturing and get the price down. BTW, "outsourcing" in this case means having a high-end automated board assembly house in Idaho solder our sweet metal-film resistors and polyprenolenesulfite film caps to our AirHead Boards. (Oh… my pressssciousss!).
So that's the route we went. We're going to spend the next few years cloistered here working on the next HeadRoom Mobile Line---a line without a product named "AirHead" in it, by the way. And have begun to deliver our last AirHead and BitHead, and boy they sound good. No they didn't break the $100 barrier, but I guaranty you don't get better parts in a unit that cheap.
Happy to answer your 2006 AirHead questions here!
The AirHead is our attempt to bring high quality headphone amplification to the masses. I see it as good design,, in high quality parts, in a durable plastic enclosure, as cheap as we can, so that people can make buying good headphones worth while.
So far, I think we must have revved the AirHead about seven times, at least. When our first AirHead came out a portable CD player was the portable player of choice---and there were some choice portable players back then. Today is another age where iPods and laptops roam the earth; and Xinful Hornets buzz feverously everywhere. It's been a bitch keeping the Airhead any where near current.
(I'd kindfully ask those of you with previous editions of the AirHead to post pix as you see fit for everyone's enlightenment.)
We've struggled with the AirHead, but by and large I think we've always delivered a quality and fully featured product (bags and USB) for it's day and age, at a price where both customer and HeadRoom benefited. In fact, USB and bag integration is STILL only done by us in any meaningful way. But even in bags, the size, shape, and use paradigm of portable players was/is still changing so rapidly that our whole current bag paradigm may be hopelessly out of date. Lastly, the price of the amp is still too high for broad market acceptance. The bottom line problem was: it cost a lot to do it by hand.
What to do?
The first question is rev it, or redesign it? (This may be the last time I mention it in public so pay attention.) If that's the first question then the second question is: how much better can you make it if your redesign it? The answer is a whole lot better. You could make them small and thin and with rechargeable batteries. You could even make real tiny ones that ran of USB for laptops. But it will take years to do well.
Well, how much better could you make it if you wanted to do it quickly? Not so surprisingly if you think about it, quite a bit. As long as we didn't change the enclosure and live with the current use paradigm (which though not optimal, is still workable) we could: redesign the amp with the AD8397 and sound quality equivalent with the current market of manufactured and DIY portable amps; we could improve the cross-feed based on what we learned from our new electronics in our high-end lines; we could add a gain switch feature and get better performance with both high and low impedance headphones; and, maybe most importantly, we could outsource our board manufacturing and get the price down. BTW, "outsourcing" in this case means having a high-end automated board assembly house in Idaho solder our sweet metal-film resistors and polyprenolenesulfite film caps to our AirHead Boards. (Oh… my pressssciousss!).
So that's the route we went. We're going to spend the next few years cloistered here working on the next HeadRoom Mobile Line---a line without a product named "AirHead" in it, by the way. And have begun to deliver our last AirHead and BitHead, and boy they sound good. No they didn't break the $100 barrier, but I guaranty you don't get better parts in a unit that cheap.
Happy to answer your 2006 AirHead questions here!