manatworks
Head-Fier
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2011
- Posts
- 76
- Likes
- 12
Gonna get this to use w/ mh335dw, looking forward to sq impression!
Would you mind also rating the Ms sound quality in direct comparison to the other DAPs you own or have owned.
Calyx M @ Jaben Singapore, pre-production model running Firmware version 0.5
Just a thought... all the talk on facebook about Calyx M being the best etc etc...killer DAP blah blah....Maybe the Calyx guys really truly believe it is better than the likes of the AK 240 simply because the resultant sound is the signature they prefer and strived to achieve. Having successfully achieved it they would naturally think it's the best. I mean they have often commented on how they were trying to make it sound natural and be excellent with live recordings. Maybe that is exactly what they have done.
Anyway... waiting for more impressions...
Well, the impressions say warm, so their idea of sounding natural is warm, I guess so. Anybody like warm signature here?
^ Fair assumption. I am naturally suspicious both of manufacturer opinions and also opinions of those who have already invested $2000+ in the AK240. Even where intentions are good, confirmation bias is too great.
monkeygod's assessment rings unbiased to me but again I have to hear the M for myself.
I'm with you on that. I did audition the AK120 and 240, and my suspicion was broken, it did sound good to my ears with UERM demo.
I know my impressions wasn't biased since I wanted it to sound bad since it's so overpriced. I was hoping that the new DX90 would bring out impressions that would talk about the device being in par with AK120(KKCC has said it sounds better than 120?) or 240, but it will be difficult get a good sample size since not many would own the AK and own the DX90.
It all depends on what equipment Monkey previously/currently owns or had extended listening time with. If so, his/her ears should be pretty good at noticing the signatures and the quality of the sound.
Personally, I like that fact that Monkey used something that is regarded as detailed and close to neutral CIEMs to audition the device, the JH13(FP?).
^ Fair assumption. I am naturally suspicious both of manufacturer opinions and also opinions of those who have already invested $2000+ in the AK240. Even where intentions are good, confirmation bias is too great.
monkeygod's assessment rings unbiased to me but again I have to hear the M for myself.
So, what happens if you audition an AK240 and like it enough to buy it? Does that mean your opinion is no longer valid?
Wouldn't that apply to all things ever purchased, and so, with your reasoning,only people who have never bought an item can have valid opinions about it?