LQQK
Head-Fier
- Joined
- Oct 18, 2007
- Posts
- 56
- Likes
- 0
I see that folks here like to try and compare the sound quality between the 160 Classic & iPhone 3GS, how about an iTouch, is it in the same league?
LQQK
LQQK
Originally Posted by LQQK /img/forum/go_quote.gif I see that folks here like to try and compare the sound quality between the 160 Classic & iPhone 3GS, how about an iTouch, is it in the same league? LQQK |
Originally Posted by ckturtle /img/forum/go_quote.gif I too, find enormeous results from burn-in. However, what I tried to convey above was that I had received 2 new 7th Gen Classics, and their SQ's, straight from the box, couldn't have been more opposite. One was quite thin, trebly and irritating while the other was warm, engaging and lush. I was surprise and did not expect the enormous differences. It leaves me with the impression that their quality control, and resulting SQ's, will differ greatly among their same product line. |
Originally Posted by estreeter /img/forum/go_quote.gif There have been extensive discussions on the difference in SQ between the current Classic (6.5G 160) and the current model Touch (3G 32/64), and I seem to recall you posting in several of those threads ..... |
Originally Posted by Jack Mono /img/forum/go_quote.gif I am sorry to say this, but that's just ridiculous! It may be that the phones are lacking too, but it may very well be that the iPod (or any other inferior DAP) is just lacking a good amp. Why is that the SONYs have good EQs? I never heard complaining anyone ever about a SONY's EQ. Also I find the CLIP+ lacking in SQ compared to a Sony S (with lossy formats). The Sansa sounds like a tin can into my face. Not too bad if you like that kind of music (notes into your face), but personally I like a bigger sound stage and warmth in my listening. The Clip's EQ is just a joke, nothing more; any settings dulls the player's sound. |
Originally Posted by kostalex /img/forum/go_quote.gif So I really hope 2009 Classic will sound better after the burn-in. |