castleofargh
Sound Science Forum Moderator
- Joined
- Jul 2, 2011
- Posts
- 10,439
- Likes
- 6,059
I was making a joke, nothing more to my post.I do sincerely apologize if I have taken anyone's assertions out of context.
I was making a joke, nothing more to my post.I do sincerely apologize if I have taken anyone's assertions out of context.
I was making a joke, nothing more to my post.
I have in hand a used copy the Sammy Davis, Jr., CD, that Bigshot referenced, i.e., The DECCA years. Before I conduct my testing I am going to burn it in for three hours.
I will be testing two assertions--first is Bigshot's assertion that this CD will cause codecs to seize up and gurgle like an old aquarium:
The second is TheSonicTruth's swirly, metallic heads and tails assertion:
as ardently defended by our kind moderator based on his own ABX tests:
Over on the "testing completely false so-called audiophile myths and fake claims" thread, or whatever the pointless, leading, condescending, self congratulatory and utterly redundant name of that thread is, I am in the process of developing a methodology for testing an interesting assertion I have recently come across in that thread:
This is the only assertion in that thread I can understand.
Also there is an NBA finals game tomorrow. I will put up a post stating when the game is over and who the teams were, but I will not post the score because our kind moderator states that the final score to a sports event is a lossy artifact, and further has honored the request of his friend that his friend remain in ignorance on the basis that somehow his friend asking us to keep him ignorant means that we all have the evidence we needed. By the way, the NBA finals involves tall men on a wooden court with a round orange ball.
I do sincerely apologize if I have taken anyone's assertions out of context.
What? Without results from Sammy Davis CD testing?Bye everyone. It’s been fun for a few days. I’ll see you in another ten years. Take care and best wishes.
What? Without results from Sammy Davis CD testing?
are we 10?
Some of the blues recordings from the 50's are great.....pretty minimalist stuff but perfect for small scale blues.I joined head-if in 2002. You can do the math. You are a bright guy. And I don’t think in that time you will find that I have ever once personally insulted anyone on head-fi. Poked fun at people in hopefully good spirits, or at least with light intentions, including at myself, yes, like right now. Parodied nonsense discussions, which I see still plague this place, yes. Made a serious point, with a lighthearted jab, well I’ve tried, like right now. Gotten carried away and run amok, well, yeah, guilty as charged. Taken things people said out of context and played totally unfair? Absolutely, like right now. That’s my move. Tried to back up a little if I hurt someone’s feelings? Well, yes, underneath this rough veneer I’m just a big teddy bear. Admitted when I was wrong? I make a point of it. But have I personally insulted anyone? No. Did I ask them if they were 10? No, nothing like that. Have my threads devolved into personal insults? Nope. And I shall guide this thread along those lines. Post at your peril here. Make sense and play nice or I may just make fun of you. And just to keep it fair you can make fun of me. If you dare. I am in the house. Steve999. smooth, DARK. So watch it. I’ll keep it in this thread from now on. This is my thread.
So, back to business.
I was looking in Foobar2000 at the spectogram for music on my new (used) CD, Sammy Davis, Jr., the Decca Years, and it showed a decent amount of what appeared to be musical content in the 17-20 kHz range. That really surprised me because the recordings are from the 1950s. Is that realistic? There seemed to be about 35 dB of dynamic range with additional transient peaks. There was lots of content in the 50 hertz area. There was no content in the 20 kHz to 22 kHz range. Is that because of “16/44” ? I don’t think there was any clipping or chopping off peaks. There seemed to be ample headroom. I am quite sure I don’t hear anything in the 17 kHz to 20 kHz range so I think as a practical matter that is lost on me anyway. I know a string bass goes down to about 41 hertz and a piano I think to about 27 hertz. I am not sure if Foobar2000 is accurate or if I am reading it accurately. Unfortunately the spectrogram in Foobar2000 does not go below 50 hz so I can’t see what’s down there unless I use another tool.
So was this likely remastered? Did they do a good job of it? I sincerely don’t know. The recodings are from the 1950s so of course there Is a substantial limit to the overall sound quality.
This may illustrate my lack of expertise. It is genuine and sincere. I am respectful of the knowledge I see here.
If you want CD recommendations on this stuff let me know.
Some of the blues recordings from the 50's are great.....pretty minimalist stuff but perfect for small scale blues.
Yeah, if you guys would give me some CD recommendations for that period that would be great, I'm all in!
From those years I've always listened to jazz, and tons of it (probably my first passion in music), but I'm not in tune to the popular singers or blues from that period.
Okay, I'm going to do 64 kbs rips of the Sammy Davis Jr., CD. Just to keep the thread on topic.
Yeah, if you guys would give me some CD recommendations for that period that would be great, I'm all in!