Quote:
Wait a second, what's wrong with doing a simple conversion? There's no point in comparing two different recordings. Even if you had identical mics, they cannot be in the same place.
So you can't tell the difference between a les paul and a stratocaster.
Instruments all have a unique sound (stradivarius etc) and as such, if you record one 16 bit and another 24 bit you will notice the difference in the detail and the fingerprint of the instrument. So you don't need to identical recordings at all.
Quote:
24/16-bit audio and global warming .. similar topics? Does not compute!
And who says you are not wrong?
I know I'm not wrong, best way to go about life, be open to everythig. You can say I am I don't care so much about one person really.
global warming - flawed science.
Quote:
So hifi reviewers are less wrong / more trustworthy. You're kidding right? Especially considering the affiliations ...
The beauty of science is that we do not have to take somebody at his/her word.
Nope, most hifi reviewers are bought off by the people who advertise in their magazines.
The problem with science is we don't understand the system yet! So it's pointless to try other than to prove the science is flawed.
Quote:
Arguments from authority .. irrelevant, anecdotal evidence ... irrelevant.
Come on, I agree in general most people aren't so good at things, but you can't generalise about everyone.
Quote:
Ensure the 16-bit file wasn't mastered differently.
One of the arguments is... what is available in the real world in 24-bit and does it sound better than the 16 bit. I guess that's a whole topic there really. And one which can't be won.
Quote:
Hide behind? These are variables that have to be controlled in order to get any meaningful result. But maybe that simple fact is above some hifi reviewers heads..
I was trying to say that some people here clearly haven't heard a difference between 24 and 16 bit files. They think their science is right and the understanding of how people perceive music complete. It's just strange when there is an obvious difference, people use science and all kinds of arguments not to accept what is there. Perhaps they just need to listen on a decent non-headphone system.
Quote:
The thread is not pointless, but irrelevant replies are.
It's pointless because no matter what science you throw at something, if the science isn't at a level of describing the real world then it's pointless trying to use science. A Bit like global warming! Who most people think is ******** feedback anyhow. You can win money if you can prove it.
Quote:
But misinformation aids progress?
My findings, I thought I would share.
Quote:
Oh, do they also offer 16-bit files for "comparison" that are secretly mastered differently .. like they did a while ago on this forum, I guess, to promote their more expensive 24-bit files?
How the hell would I know, I just download the 24-bit ones because they are free. Perhaps if you want to find out go and have a look. I thought I would just share a free resource of 24-bit files for those who are probably interested in 24-bit music. I'm not even a Linn fan at all, or come to think of it Naim do a good job at providing overpriced averageness. Linn have come up in my estimation by offering Free music though.
Quote:
edit:
And what is the point of that?
So you think I'm not so newb who is using a pair of ****ty AKG headphones linked up to an fiio or something. I dont have a 250k stereo, it was in a shop for half a day.
I do have friends with recording studios, loads of bands / orchestras though.
Update, speakers were quad 2905's but to be honest I didn't think they were so great sounding.
Yes I do understand how Audio works, but I try not to let it spoil my enjoyment of music.