- Joined
- Feb 23, 2011
- Posts
- 16,416
- Likes
- 3,094
It seems to me that P-P is a hybrid of the O2 and the C5. Impressive.
![basshead.gif](http://files.head-fi.org/images/smilies/basshead.gif)
It seems to me that P-P is a hybrid of the O2 and the C5. Impressive.![]()
Seems hunky dory here.
It seems to me that P-P is a hybrid of the O2 and the C5. Impressive.![]()
It's the touring Alpha Dog. Tracey will get it after me on Friday.
EveTan was.
Isn't it the same? You're still paying an obscene amount for what the PC equivalent would achieve at a much lower price.
First, I guess I'm looking at that performance/price ratio.
It'd be helpful if perhaps you guys could list some PC alternatives ( in terms of raw specs). Let's say I wanted a snappy computer for video/photo editing etc.
Really....any that have a modern i5 or i7 with 8GB+ of RAM and a SSD will basically lead to an extremely snappy computer for video and photo editing.
People overblow GPU's and their usage in those areas. The Intel 4000HD's are more than enough for the hardware acceleration for those programs generally in terms of price for performance. Paying for a Gaming laptop the same price as the Ultrabook at the $1000 price area(which means the Ultrabook will have the SSD and better CPU if we go by best computer performance at that price in that area) for just Video and photo editing will leave the Ultrabook in the lead is what I'm getting at. In that a good GPU does have many good parts for some video editing programs and its acceleration possibilites but its quite overblown right now.
So yeah, Samsung Ultrabooks or even Toshiba and Lenovo ones. I'm saying Ultrabook because those (typically) have SSD's, good RAM, and high CPU power but you are indeed paying a premium for the build. If there was a 'regular' laptop with SSD, 8+GB or RAM and a i5 or i7 3xxxm then it will be fine if not better for the price.
A lot of differences are under the hood in performance, battery life, cooling, the chips, and ports on the computer. And depending on model you buy, some don't have Retina.
. Well, there are some compelling windows ultrabooks that are out or coming out, but none with quad core processors to my knowledge. I'm honestly not sure how much a lower frequency quad core CPU will help you versus a dual core CPU though in all honesty.
The new Haswell CPUs are definitely worth the extra money, IMO.
Some alternatives to the MBP reteyenuh that I've found are:
Samsung ativ book+ (3200x1800 display, dual core Haswell, 128GB SSD, 4GB RAM)
Lenovo Yoga 2 (3200x1800 display, dual core Haswell, storage varies. Probably the best deal right now since one model is or at least was $250 off last time I checked)
Asus Zenbook Infinity (2560x1440 display, dual core Haswell, rest of the specs unknown by me. Will be coming out later this year. Looks the sexiest of everything out there IMO.)
1: Quicker boot times. On my OCZ Vertex 4 SSDs, Windows 8 loads in about 8 seconds (excluding UEFI POST screen) and on my netbook, it takes about 20 seconds with an Intel 320 series SSD (excluding BIOS POST)
Oh, and I honestly think the lack of a startbar makes me more efficient when I'm using my desktop. Instead using the windows button for shortcuts for stuff, I just memorized the keyboard shortcuts for each respective thing I wanted to do.
It's the touring Alpha Dog. Tracey will get it after me on Friday.
Oh you lucky persons...
Be sure to tell us if they are really this groundbreaking
Sorry for bringing this up again. Between Mac models, I'm narrowing it down to the 1600-1700 price point.
I could get the last gen 15 in Macbook Pro 2.4 ghz i7 Quad core which should have 7 hr battery life
or
the newest 13in Macbook Pro 2.6 ghz i5 dual core which clocks at around 9 hrs of life. It also has the faster pci based stuff etc...
Both priced at around the same price.
Not going to look at higher priced options anymore.
Would the referbished 15 in model be much faster at editing stuff compared to the dual core 13 in?
Right now I'm trying to balance the benefits and costs of ea option...(better batterylife, faster read/write vs faster processor etc)
Hehehe...P-P....
Jiyoung might too......![]()
From what I've listened to so far it reminds me of a LCD-2: a bit closed-in, but spacious for a closed-back, a bit thick and dark, excellent midrange with good weight, smooth laid-back treble. I like its midrange more than the SRS-2170, but the STAX have the instrument separation and speed that I like. I actually think the Alpha Dog has a larger soundstage than the STAX but the STAX have a level of instrument clarity that just can't be matched by it; they are quite different in presentation.
This just doesn't sound the same on the Alpha Dog as it does with the STAX.
From what I've listened to so far it reminds me of a LCD-2: a bit closed-in, but spacious for a closed-back, a bit thick and dark, excellent midrange with good weight, smooth laid-back treble. I like its midrange more than the SRS-2170, but the STAX have the instrument separation and speed that I like. I actually think the Alpha Dog has a larger soundstage than the STAX but the STAX have a level of instrument clarity that just can't be matched by it; they are quite different in presentation.
This just doesn't sound the same on the Alpha Dog as it does with the STAX.
Sounds good so far. How is the super cool screw-powered bass?
Cloudkicker is awesome btw.
Bought almost all of his EPs and LPs ^o^
Would the referbished 15 in model be much faster at editing stuff compared to the dual core 13 in?
Right now I'm trying to balance the benefits and costs of ea option...(better batterylife, faster read/write vs faster processor etc)