General Information

Evaluating the Parks Audio Waxwing: Digital Dilemma or Solution?​


TLDR:
Pros:
  • Great price and feature set.
  • Does exactly what I want and need.
  • Great smartphone app for control.
Cons:
  • None in this price point.
  • Digitizing vinyl is haram.

Introduction:

I’ve never written one of these on here before, but I really appreciate the tremendous detail, thoughts, and criticism that many of you have provided on headphones and equipment when I’m deciding what gear to buy. Your opinions have proven invaluable to me, and I only hope to return the favor in my own small way.

I’d like to discuss a relatively small company and its boutique phono preamp, the Waxwing. Parks Audio is a small company run by founder and owner Shannon Parks. He’s a nice fellow who kindly responded to my impatient emails while I waited for the launch of the Waxwing. Prior to building the Waxwing, Parks Audio has built several boutique phono pre amps like the legendary Puffin and the Budgie. However, the new Waxwing is the first to be controlled by a smartphone app.

tempImageB5apSv.jpg

The Waxwing

So, what is the Waxwing? In short, the Waxwing ($499 + $15 shipping) is a phono preamp. It's about 3 inches by 3 inches by 1 inch. It's is a tiny little black box with no buttons, some I/O on the back, "Waxwing" printed on the front. But it’s far far more than a phono preamp. It’s also an analog to digital converter (ADC) and digital signal processor (DSP) all controlled by an app on your smartphone.

Yeah, yeah yeah, I know. “Hey! You got “digital” in my analog? Gross! I certainly would never have considered this even a few months ago, enjoying my purely analog setup’s rich caramel flavors and buttery smooth tubey vibes. I have resisted Class D amps, streaming (when I have a physical alternative), and the verboten“Bluetooth.” So, shouldn’t a digital phono pre be the biggest no-no for an all-analog setup? Well, of course lol.

But I’m not writing this to say that the Waxwing isn’t worth the price of admission. In fact, I am arguing that it’s worth far more than that despite being the weakest digital link in my otherwise all-analog rig.

I’ve already buried the lede, so here’s a breakdown in a sentence: The Waxwing is an exciting, incredibly performant digital phono pre that solves the problem of digitizing records and more. The digital aspect is not an error but rather a solution.

IMG_9175.jpeg

Why on God's Green Earth?

With that caveat now covered, let’s cover who the emptors are. You are a vinyl record collector. Your collection is unwieldy and expensive. Digital music is convenient and cheap and far better than it used to be. What if you could digitize your enormous physical media collection and store it in something the size of a wallet? Well, if you’re such a person, then the Waxwing’s flexibility, cost, and design are at the perfect cross of cost and benefit.

For example, the free Waxwing app (available for iOS and Android) instantly connects to your Waxwing via Bluetooth (there are no buttons on the chassis. It includes standard settings you need in any phono pre like gain, high and low filters, and MC and MM loading. But here is where it exceeds many of the alternative competitors. It also includes a million features that, thanks to the ADC/DSP combo, you won’t get on anything else (that I know of).

These excellent and useful features include warmth, air, treble, bass, mono and supermono modes, automatic vinyl grading algorithms, “Magic,” “FX,” derumble, PEQ, balance, phase, output modes, phono curve adjustment and presets, dB level tracking, and a bass shelf. But wait, there’s more! An entire submenu is dedicated to “tests” including RPM measurement, azimuth separation balance, fine channel balancing, and even a sine wave generator. I think that’s everything but considering the Waxwing can be updated with new firmware, and Shannon is passionate about his work, I think we can expect more in the future—whatever that might be. (I used both the Azimuth and the RPM tests and they correct reported back what I already knew about my rig.)

Whew! That’s a mouthful. Let’s unpack one of the less self-explanatory ones. The Waxwing app states that the “Magic” toggle:

“gently lessens many of the small pops and clicks normally heard during vinyl playback. It consists of a click detector that monitors the music for outlier, transient sound events which are then flagged. An algorithm then determines whether the flagged event was likely noise or music in nature…Once it has determined that the event was noise, a selective filter is engaged for around half a millisecond. So, the Magic function is not processing 100% of the audio like a normal DSP filter and actually may only be filtering a few seconds of audio per album per side.”​

This is a clever piece of kit, that in my tests lives up to its name and feels “magical.” It is far more desirable, for me at least, than older noise suppression techniques which often cut off the high end. This is far more capable and exact; it removes noise without harming the music.

3C0B81EE-2023-4FC5-9928-B62DFCC918BF.jpeg

Does It Sound Bad?

So, the next question is, does digitized vinyl sound bad? Well, I think it at least sounds neutral and flatter than unvarnished analog. But Parks Audio has thought of this too, giving you the option to add Warmth and Air that can be adjusted to your liking, as well as FX like 2nd and 3rd order harmonics to gain back some of what was lost in translation.

Beyond all its tricks, the Waxwing does one thing superbly well. It is a transparent sounding phono pre that allows you to output via optical, coax, or line out RCA. The analog output still utilizes the DSP so you can still make whatever adjustments you’d like before to the signal before it arrives at your preamp. But the digital outs are what make this special and are the culmination of years of refinement and research by Parks Audio.

When you select digital out, you can either output digital or analog and you get the option of 24/48 or 24/96. You can also use the optical and coax outputs simultaneously if, for example, you want to run a line to your computer for digitalizing your record while monitoring it via your stereo or headphone setup. What I found worked best for me was turntable > analog phono pre > Waxwing > DAC. Since my analog phono pre has two line outs, I was able to A/B test using my preamp input selector.

IMG_7006.jpeg

Okay, stop wasting our time, what were the results of the A/B?

The analog only sounds more open, like an open window. The digital translation (and then back via my DAC) feels more artificial. But the digital version has some major advantages. Using the 2nd harmonics, warmth, and air features, among other tweaks, I was able to get the digital version sounding suitably “analog.” But where the Waxwing really shines is when playing older, noisier, and damaged records. The “magic” feature demonstrably removes decades of wear and tear on your vinyl to the point that it made some of my previously unlistenable records perfectly adequate and enjoyable.

In fact, the noise suppression and error correction are breathtaking. I’d say that it makes a VG- record play VG+ and a G+ record play VG. It won’t fix your records, but it can do a helluva lot to improve them without any discernible drawbacks. I used the following settings. Gain 2dB, Warmth +2, Air +2, Bass Boost On, Hi shelf 30khz, Lo Shelf 20hz, Magic On, FX Tube 2H.

Record used for testing: Martin Denny self-titled LRP 3438 which is borderline unlistenable (for me) even after a brush down (I don’t have a wet wash please don’t sue me). But with the Waxwing it’s clear, concise, and much more enjoyable. There is still noise in the dead wax between songs because the algorithm has a harder time discerning between noise vs silence and music vs silence (speculation). Using the Mono and SuperMono options further reduces noise on mono records (like the Martin Denny S/T) into the VG+ range in my experience but YMMV.

I forced my wife to listen to my A/B on this record and on a clean record. She vastly preferred the digital version both times. It sounds tighter, less noisy, and improves bass response.

Conclusion: or How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb Digital​

This is a very respectable and enjoyable way to listen to this 60-year-old record. But, ultimately, am I now listening to a simulacrum of the real thing? Why not just stream it?

I don’t have an answer for you. Sometimes it’s just fun to play with equipment and to make old vinyl sound new again. And if that sounds like something you’re interested in, then the Waxwing can save you a ton of money from having to buy pricier, single-use tools and equipment.

For example, there are some very high-end solutions to surface noise, clicks, pops, etc from companies like SweetVinyl and their $2250 SugarCube SC-1 Mini/Phono which likely has a bigger/better/stronger implementation of noise reduction as well as other bigger/better/stronger tricks, but for less than a quarter of the price (and my inability to test it), I think this is likely an awesome solution. There’s also the Pro-Ject NRS Box S3 which reduces noise for just $400.

Then there are crosstalk elimination options from companies like Black Ice / Jolida for $350$ or even just the ability to test azimuth with a Musical Surroundings Fozgometer for another $400.

Then there is the digitizing aspect. I haven't had the time to do more than toy around with this, but using Audacity I was able to capture a recording of the Martin Denny record with the noise control features on and it was audibly transparent and completely useable. If you want to digitize your record collection, and save yourself a ton of space and money, you can.

Well, the Waxwing can do all of that (albeit digitally), for a fraction of the cost.

Gear used in test:
Rega P2 with Ania MC Cart and Ortofon Bronze MM Cart
Schiit Skoll
Parks Audio Waxwing
Schiit Gungnir MB
Schiit Freya +
Schiit monoblocked GHorns
KEF 104/2 and SVS SB1000

IMG_9177.jpeg

Comments

thaddeusflowe

New Head-Fier
So like a CD and EQ with extra steps? :thinking:
I think that undersells it. There are a ton of old and worse-for-wear records out there that do not exist on streaming or cd. Vinyl also has known fun aspects that are missing from other media--and being able to utilize modern tech like EQ and your preferred DAC for vinyl also has certain benefits. Another reason that occurred to me is that you could also use this to easily digitize SACDs, which usually can only be put out over RCA unless you are smart enough to rip them to your computer.
 

Simon Patten

100+ Head-Fier
I own one of these as well so I thought I'd add some comments.

Back in the 1980s I put together what was the classic system of the time - Linn Sondek LP12/Ekos/Troika with Naim 32-5/HiCap/250 and Linn Isobarik DMS speakers. That stood me in good stead until a couple of years ago when I decided to build a decent digital system as I spend most of my time at the computer, it's much more convenient, and I was rarely bothering to go to the trouble of firing up the Hi-Fi and playing vinyl. To cut a long story short, I sold the Naims and Isobariks, all for quite a bit more then I'd paid for them, and ended up with an ADI-2 DAC and Aune S17 Pro amp which sound incredible together. I kept my beloved Sondek and started thinking about how I could carry on using it and rip my more obscure albums to Hi-Res FLAC.

I discovered the Parks Audio Puffin, which people spoke highly of, then found that it was being replaced with the Waxwing. I chatted with Shannon who was very friendly and helpful and it appeared that it would do exactly what I needed. As soon as he was ready to start shipping them internationally I ordered one (#99).

The Waxwing is a phono front end that feeds into an A2D converter, has lots of DSP, then either outputs a coax/optical digital signal or converts from D2A for an RCA analogue output. As mentioned above, it also has a very interesting app that lets you control aspects of the sound and a remarkable input stage that can take the tiny signal from my Troika MC cartridge right up to Line-In so I can rip some of my old tapes to digital as well. The app connects directly to the Waxwing via Bluetooth LE and is open source so if Shannon ever stops supporting it it will continue to work, but the Bluetooth is purely for this - no Bluetooth audio.

Being older with worn out hearing, I don't really feel qualified to comment on the sound, other than to say that it is very good indeed, as good as 'proper' digital copies to my ears and some of the analogue warmth comes through, making my body respond and my fingers and feet tap more than with pure digital copies.

All in all I have been very pleased with it. Alternative devices would have ended up costing a lot more and not fitting my needs so perfectly so I can certainly recommend it for converting any analogue audio input to digital, but especially phono of course. VinylStudio works very well for ripping albums, and don't tell anyone but it keeps working past the trial period so there's no need to pay for it!

Info: https://parksaudiollc.com
The app: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=www.parksaudiollc.com.waxwing_release_00
(You can play with it without connecting to the device. I don't know if there's an Apple version.)
 

ScrofulousBinturong

100+ Head-Fier
Thanks for the detail. I'm not trying to start an argument, I just don't understand why one would want to bother with LPs and a turn table and this device if you're sending the LP through a bunch of EQ and DSP anyway.

But if you like the sound and the experience, that's all that matters and I'm 100% on board with that.

Regardless, I read the review and comments and learned something today.
 

Simon Patten

100+ Head-Fier
No problem. I sold the Naims and Isobariks as they took up a lot of space, were rarely used and paid for a lot of my move to digital but my Sondek is very special to me; I wanted one for a long time, worked hard for it, and I'll never sell it. I have a cupboard full of albums, some of which will probably never appear online, and I wanted to be able to use the LP12 so the Waxwing was the perfect solution, it lets me rip my more obscure albums to Hi-Res FLAC (up to 24bit/96k) and just enjoy the more tactile and sensory experience of vinyl. I also prefer to have my own copies as much as possible so I don't lose everything if I stop paying a monthly fee and can keep my [digital] collection on my DAP.

I get your point but since I had converted to digital, the Waxwing let me keep and use my treasured turntable and album collection while having the convenience of digital. It may not sound quite as good (debatable) but it's not far off and gives me the best of both worlds.
 

thaddeusflowe

New Head-Fier
Thanks for the detail. I'm not trying to start an argument, I just don't understand why one would want to bother with LPs and a turn table and this device if you're sending the LP through a bunch of EQ and DSP anyway.

But if you like the sound and the experience, that's all that matters and I'm 100% on board with that.

Regardless, I read the review and comments and learned something today.

Yeah I think I didn't write enough about the "digitizing your record collection" aspect. I think that's a main selling point and perhaps I will be able to tackle it in the future.
 

zowie

Headphoneus Supremus
I'm thinking of buying this to run line level in my effects or tape loop.
Then I can have all of its features when I need them (e.g., for damaged or non-RIAA records) and listen to my LPs all analogue the rest of the time.
It'd replace my analogue and external eqs and noise reduction devices.
And I'd have a good digital out if I do want to "digitize" a record now and then.
Only down side I can think of is I'm paying for the phono preamplification I wouldn't really be using.
Good or bad idea?
 

thaddeusflowe

New Head-Fier
I'm thinking of buying this to run line level in my effects or tape loop.
Then I can have all of its features when I need them (e.g., for damaged or non-RIAA records) and listen to my LPs all analogue the rest of the time.
It'd replace my analogue and external eqs and noise reduction devices.
And I'd have a good digital out if I do want to "digitize" a record now and then.
Only down side I can think of is I'm paying for the phono preamplification I wouldn't really be using.
Good or bad idea?
Yeah, I essentially use it for that as well since I run my phono pre into it at line level. It fixes my bad records and adds effects and digitization out. I don't know of anything in a comparable price bracket that does all of that plus a phono pre. That is one of the reasons I felt compelled to write this article.
 

zowie

Headphoneus Supremus
I figured in one of the loops it'd be totally out of the system when I don't want it, and could be used on other sources too if there was some utility.

It'd be cool if they could build in eq curves that would approximate Dolby B and C de-emphasis.
 

thaddeusflowe

New Head-Fier
I figured in one of the loops it'd be totally out of the system when I don't want it, and could be used on other sources too if there was some utility.

It'd be cool if they could build in eq curves that would approximate Dolby B and C de-emphasis.
Yeah, I have two outs from my phono pre, one goes straight to my preamp and one goes here. I can A/B easily using my preamp and choose which is best depending on the quality of the vinyl.

I don't think there is a "Dolby" noise reduction option but the available "magic" noise reduction is pretty good. There is an PEQ that you can utilize as well.
 

Simon Patten

100+ Head-Fier
It's certainly a very versatile device and sounds as if it'll be ideal for you, Zowie. Do talk to Shannon, it's his baby and he likes to know how people are using it. I'm still amazed that the same input can handle both MC cartridge and line in with just a tweak of the app, there's some magic in that little box! :)
 
Back
Top