The L5 Pro was provided to me gratis as a review sample. I have made it clear to L&P that I still regard any product they send me as their sole property and available for return any time at their request. But I thank them for the ability to continue use of the L5 Pro – both for follow up comparisons and also for my own personal use.
INTRODUCTION
I’ve been reviewer on Head-Fi for some time now, and one of the distinct advantages I’ve had is being able to listen to, and compare, equipment that would normally be beyond my frugal budget. Last year I was lucky enough to be approached by Luxury and Precision (contacts arranged through Twister6 and John Yang), to listen to, and evaluate their TOTL DAP – the LP5. This proved to be an absolute eye-opener for me as it was the first time that I realised portable gear (if designed well) could rival desktop set-ups. It also proved to be the best sounding DAP I’ve heard (with full sized headphones).Fast forward a year and I’m now reviewing their L5 Pro DAP. It’s a player I’ve actually had now for around 3 months, and I would have reviewed earlier, but I chose (with Mr Wan’s blessing) to wait until the firmware was a little more mature.
The L5 Pro is available at Penon Audio for USD 809, and therefore sits between the LP5 Gold (USD 1090) and Fiio’s new X7 (USD 650).
DISCLAIMER
I was provided the Luxury & Precision L5 Pro as a review sample. There is no financial incentive from L&P in writing this review. I am in no way affiliated with L&P - and this review is my honest opinion of the L5 Pro. I would like to thank Alex, John and Mr Wan for making this opportunity available.
Additional disclaimer – the unit I have unfortunately arrived with a faulty volume pot. It is usable but does not rotate normally. I have chosen to ignore this issue in the review, as the issue looks to be a one-off, and I know if this was a purchased unit, L&P would have immediately replaced it.
ABOUT LUXURY & PRECISION
Luxury & Precision is a Chinese based audio company headed by the main designer, Mr Wan, who previously created the Colorfly C4 and CK4, and more recently (as Luxury & Precision) the LP5 which I reviewed here. From what I have seen in L&P’s designs to date, they are uncompromising on using the best sonic components available, and very particular in creating striking aesthetic designs which are often a fusion between contemporary and traditional.
PREAMBLE - 'ABOUT ME'.
(This is to give any readers a baseline for interpreting the review).
I'm a 48 year old music lover. I don't say audiophile – I just love my music. Over the last couple of years, I have slowly changed from cheaper listening set-ups to my current set-up. I vary my listening from portables (Fiio X5ii, X3ii, LP5 and iPhone 5S) to my desk-top's set-up (PC > USB > iFi iDSD). I also use a portable set-up at work – either X5ii/X3ii > HP, or PC > E17K > HP. My main full sized headphones at the time of writing are the Beyer T1, Sennheiser HD600, and AKG K553. Most of my portable listening is done with IEMs, and lately it has mainly been with the Dunu DN-2000J, Jays q-Jays, Alclair Curve2 and Adel U6. A full list of the gear I have owned (past and present is listed in my Head-Fi profile).
I have very eclectic music tastes listening to a variety from classical/opera and jazz, to grunge and general rock. I listen to a lot of blues, jazz, folk music, classic rock, indie and alternative rock. I am particularly fond of female vocals. I generally tend toward cans that are relatively neutral/balanced, but I do have a fondness for clarity, and suspect I might have slight ‘treble-head’ preferences. I am not treble sensitive (at all), and in the past have really enjoyed headphones like the K701, SR325i, and of course the T1 and DT880.
I have extensively tested myself (ABX) and I find aac256 or higher to be completely transparent. I do use exclusively redbook 16/44.1 if space is not an issue. All of my music is legally purchased (mostly CD – the rest FLAC purchased on-line).
I tend to be sceptical about audiophile ‘claims’, don’t generally believe in burn-in, have never heard a difference with different cables, and would rather test myself blind on perceived differences. I am not a ‘golden eared listener’. I suffer from mild tinnitus, and at 48, my hearing is less than perfect.
I have very eclectic music tastes listening to a variety from classical/opera and jazz, to grunge and general rock. I listen to a lot of blues, jazz, folk music, classic rock, indie and alternative rock. I am particularly fond of female vocals. I generally tend toward cans that are relatively neutral/balanced, but I do have a fondness for clarity, and suspect I might have slight ‘treble-head’ preferences. I am not treble sensitive (at all), and in the past have really enjoyed headphones like the K701, SR325i, and of course the T1 and DT880.
I have extensively tested myself (ABX) and I find aac256 or higher to be completely transparent. I do use exclusively redbook 16/44.1 if space is not an issue. All of my music is legally purchased (mostly CD – the rest FLAC purchased on-line).
I tend to be sceptical about audiophile ‘claims’, don’t generally believe in burn-in, have never heard a difference with different cables, and would rather test myself blind on perceived differences. I am not a ‘golden eared listener’. I suffer from mild tinnitus, and at 48, my hearing is less than perfect.
My experience with DAPs in the past has ranged from the lower end all the way to what I would consider as high-end, and includes experience with most of Fiio’s line-up including the X7, the HSA Studio V3, and of course L&P’s own flagship LP5 Gold.
WHAT I LOOK FOR IN A DAP
I thought I’d list (before I start with the review) what I really look for in a new DAP.
- Clean, neutral signature – but with body (not thin)
- Good build quality
- Reasonable battery life
- Easy to use and practical interface
- Able to drive both low impedance and (within reason) higher impedance cans without additional amping.
- Value for money
- Enough storage to hold either my favourite albums in redbook, or my whole library in a reasonably high resolution lossy format (for me – aac256)
So how did the L5 Pro fare? Does it meet its price point expectations, and would I buy it?
This is a purely subjective review - my gear, my ears, and my experience. Please take it all with a grain of salt - especially if it does not match your own experience.
THE REVIEW
For the sake of brevity, from this point onward, I’m going to simply call the Luxury & Precision L5 Pro the “L5 Pro” – as much for ease of typing than anything else.PACKAGING AND ACCESSORIES
The L5 Pro arrived in a plain cardboard outer packing box, which (like the LP5 before it) gave no clues as to what lay inside. Opening the flap revealed a black sleeve, simply adorned with the words “Luxury & Precision”, over two more identically sized inner boxes. The inner boxes are 94 x 185 x 31 mm, have a textured outer black layer and consist of a box and lid configuration. Opening the first box I was presented with the L5 Pro in all its gorgeous glory safely nestled in a soft felt/velour on foam moulded cut-out. Below the cut-out is a black envelope which contains the user manual (all in Chinese), a screen protector, and a warranty card.
The second box has two separate smaller inner cases – labelled USB cable and leather case. The case is genuine tan suede leather, is perfectly formed for the LP5, and fits like a glove. The cut-outs for button and ports are perfectly formed, fit precisely and provide easy access. The case feels really good in hand, looks wonderful, and above all provides very good protection – especially with the outer surface adding a 1-2mm buffer between the screen and any hard surface (if laid face down).
[size=inherit][/size] | ||
Case and USB cable | Rear of the leather case | USB cable - gold connectors and ferrite choke |
The USB box houses a high quality USB cable with a ferrite choke and gold plated connectors on both ends.
All throughout the first opening of boxes and discovery of their contents, the underlying feeling was indeed true to the company’s name – Luxury & Precision. Everything you need is included – except perhaps a SPDIF cable. First impressions are that the presentation so far meets the price bracket expectation.
[size=inherit][/size] | ||
L5 Pro in its case | Paperwork - warranty manual & screen protector | The gorgeous L5 Pro |
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
The table below lists most of the relevant specifications, and so that I can show comparison with the two other DAPs I have in this higher end bracket – I have also shown the X7 and LP5 specs. I have chosen not to show output power measurements because (a) there are none shown on the L&P specs, and (b) it is simpler to show the associated volumes in the body of the review – admittedly from a more subjective standpoint.
| L&P L5 Pro | L&P LP5 | Fiio X7 |
Approx cost | ~ USD 809 | ~ USD 1090 | ~ USD 650 |
Dimensions | ~ 123 x 63 x 17mm | ~ 133 x 76 x 24mm | ~ 130 x 64 x 17mm |
Weight | 217g | 200g | 210g |
Lossless file formats supported | APE, FLAC, WAV, ALAC, AIFF, WV (but please read review) | APE, FLAC, WAV, WMA, ALAC, DSF, DFF, AIFF, WV(WavPack) | APE, FLAC, WAV, WMA, ALAC, DSF, DFF |
Lossy file formats supported | MP3, aac, ogg vorbis, WMA WV (but please read review) | MP3, aac, ogg vorbis | MP3, aac, ogg vorbis |
Use as external DAC? | Yes – limited to 44.1/16 | Yes – limited to 44.1/16 | No – but planned with fw |
Play time | Up to 12 hours | 12 hours | 9 hours+ |
DAC chip used | AKM Verita 4490 | AK4414 | ES9018S |
Main amp chip | 1812A | 1812A | OPA1612 |
S/N (H/O) | Not stated | 123 dB | 115 dB (A-Weight) |
THD+N (H/O) | Not stated | <0.0015% | < 0.0015% |
Highest resolution | 768 kHz, 32 bits | 192 kHz, 32 bits | 384 kHz, 32 bits |
DSD/DSF/DFF support | Yes – Native | Yes – Native | Yes – Native |
Impedance (H/O) | Not stated | Not stated | < 0.5 ohm |
Line Out | Yes, shared with digital out | Yes – separate port | Yes, shared with digital out |
Digital Out | Yes – separate port, 3.5mm to coax | Yes – coax port | Yes – separate port, 3.5mm to coax (cable supplied) |
External storage | 1 x Micro sdxc up to 128Gb | 1 x Micro sdxc up to 128Gb | 1 x Micro sdxc up to 128Gb |
Internal memory | 32Gb | 64Gb | 32Gb |
Shell / Casing | Aluminium magnesium alloy with rosewood back | Aluminium-lithium alloy with rosewood back and sides | 6061 Aluminium alloy |
If at any stage I’m given further specifications, I will add them to the table – especially on performance, power and impedance.
In addition – because the internals boast high quality parts, and Mr Wan has again spared no expense with the L5 Pro, I’ve also listed some of the main features and further specifications from their website / literature. We’ll look at some of these in more depth in the review.
Features:
- Display: 3.5-inch IPS display, resolution is 480 * 320, OGS type touch screen.
- Body and buttons Materials: 6 Series aluminium-magnesium alloy, CNC integrated molding process, anodized surface and sand blasting
- Physical buttons: Play /pause, forward / back, volume knob button, hold/lock button, two customisable function buttons (C1, C2)
- Five gain-modes to meet various earphones, ultra-low gain, low gain, medium gain, high gain, ultra-high gain. Better adapted to suit any impedance headphones
- L5‘s volume control way is encoder plus professional volume control chip CIRRUS CS3310.
Further Specifications
- Master Control Chip: 1812C
- DAC Chip: AKM latest generation VERITA 4490 (DAC supports sampling rates 32BIT 768KHZ, DAC supports up to DSD256)
- USB support sampling rates up to 24 Bit/192Khz(to be supported later through firmware updates)
- Crystal Oscillator: 1PPM TCXO
- Op Amp: Precision
- Headphone Amp: 1812A double crown (means best performance selected out of 2/5 chips)
- Co-Processor: 1812M supports up 32BIT decoding and hardware solute various DSD format (DIFF, DSF,DAT and ISO format)
- Power Management Chip: 1812P
- Professional Volume Control Chip: CS3310
- PCB: 6 layer 3U dark gold matte black
- Inductance: sun lure closed electromagnetic inductance
- Filter Capacitor: ultra-low ESR MLCC Murata X7S 6.3V100UF
- Buttons: Alpine extra-long life buttons
- Built-in Memory: 32GB only, 24 bit dual channel flash memory optimized for sonic performance.
- Additional Memory Slot: Up to 128gb Micro-SD cards.
- Charging Voltage and Current: the charging voltage 5V, the charge current must be greater than 500mA, recommended more than 1.5A charging current, in order to obtain the fastest charge rate.
BUILD
What looks good to us is very subjective and will differ from person to person. From my personal point of view, when I first saw the L5 Pro, my immediate thoughts were that it looked drop dead gorgeous. Even after 3 months, I still think it is one of the best looking DAPs I’ve had the pleasure to use.
The outer shell consists of solid single piece chassis of magnesium-aluminium alloy which has been precision CNC processed. For finishing L&P have anodized and sand blasted the surface. What you are left with is a gorgeous gun-metal smooth and precise chassis which has a lot of straight edges and angles – but these are softened slightly by micro bevels on all the 90 degree angles. Where the LP5 is curves and luxury, and the X7 is smart and minimal, the L5 Pro projects both industrial reliability and also extreme precision. I don’t know if that the look they were going for but I love it.
The rear of the unit (the back plate) is dark rosewood, and anyone knowing Mr Wan’s heritage with the Colorfly and also LP5 will recognise this as a particular trademark of his designs (the use of wood). Rather than feeling awkward or out of place – it actually goes quite nicely. The L&P logos are nicely carved/imprinted into the Rosewood surface. And for those not liking this aspect of the design – it disappears when you use the cover.
The front of the unit is mainly taken up with the large 3.5 inch, 480 x 320 res IPS touch screen. The screen is very easy to read indoors, and even outdoors in direct sunlight I had no real issues with the controls (it washes out a little, but still legible). The software has 5 brightness settings so you can adjust to suit.
[size=inherit][/size] | ||
Bottom - all ports and sockets | Rosewood ear plate | L5 Pro inside it's leather case |
The right hand side has 3 buttons which control play/pause, and track advance/reverse as well as scrubbing (by holding the buttons whilst playing). The play/pause button doubles as an on/off switch. The top has 3 buttons on an angled section on the front face – two of which are user programmable whilst the third turns the screen on and off and can also lock the controls. All of the buttons give good tactile feedback and are very easy to locate.
Also at the top right is the analogue volume pot. I won’t go into great detail about this because unfortunately mine arrived with a fault. While it does change the volume, it’s not smooth on my unit, and takes more turns to adjust one point of volume. I’ve taken no marks off in the review for this – as any reviewer knows, these things can sometimes happen – and no-one so far has mentioned similar issues. Other than that the pot tracks from 0-60, and measured with my SPL meter each click appears to change the level by around 1-1.5 dB. This is only approx. – because above 30 dB seemed to be +1.5 and below about 28/60 the changes were almost exactly 1.0 dB. I don’t know at this stage if that is by design, or if it is my faulty pot. Either way – the volume is fine enough that you’ll be able to find your ideal listening level.
At the bottom of the unit are the inputs and outputs and include a 3.5mm headphone out, 3.5mm line-out/coaxial out, USB port (for charging, data transfer, and to use the USB DAC mode) and a single micro SD storage card.
The plug sockets are very firm, precise, and when plugged to the appropriate jacks feel very solid. The coaxial out seems to require a 4 pole connector – or at least the Fiio one works well with the L5 Pro.
In summary, I’m very impressed with the build quality (with the exception of my faulty volume pot). So once again high marks – the L5 Pro again meets its price expectation point.
UI (USER INTERFACE) / USABILITY / FEATURES
Please note that this is with the current released firmware 1.0.0.6.
The first comment I’d make with the L5 Pro is that the UI is a huge improvement over the UI on the L&P5. The inclusion of the touch screen makes navigation a lot easier, and if some of the quirks were ironed out, and features added, it could be on par with its price point. So in this next section, we’ll summarise the features that are there, and then we’ll look at what needs work or is missing altogether.
The other thing to note at this stage is that whilst the screen is touch enabled, there is no swiping at this stage, so scrolling is push button to the next/previous screen. This takes a while to get used to. While scrolling in any of the explorer or menu screens, you can use the physical previous / next buttons to go up or down, and holding these buttons will scroll (to an extent).
At the very top is a status bar which shows whether you are playing or paused, the current volume, the battery status, and there is also icons which show up if you have SPDIF enabled or have the L5 Pro charging. The status bar is visible from all screens.
[size=inherit][/size] | ||
Album screen | Artist with multiple albums - and nothing in order | Now playing screen |
When first switching the L5 Pro on, you are greeted with a main menu which gives access to folder, song, artist or album browsing. At the top is a back arrow. On the right is touch button to access settings, and next to it is one to go to the now playing screen. The main body of the screen shows choices available depending on the browsing mode you choose – folder, song, artist or album.
Folder mode brings up either internal or external and behaves like any other folder mode. At this stage I’ve split my artists into groups by letter, and also split them across internal and external storage. Song mode lists all songs in the library (via the tag/scanned data system) – and everything is listed in alpha numeric order – with all artists/albums mixed together. I’ve only got a third of my total library on the L5 Pro (2425 tracks) but there is no search function, no swiping, so I’d have to potentially push my way through 200+ pages of songs to find a particular track in this mode (which makes it essentially useless) – however it is good if you want to shuffle your entire library. Artist mode lists artists in alphabetic order (much easier), but then tracks are listed again in alpha numeric order – so if you have multiple albums, they are all jumbled together. Album listing at least shows complete albums – and in order – but again if you have a large collection then you’ll need to get used to scrolling several pages to get where you need to.
[size=inherit][/size] | ||
Close up of info in now playing screen | My folder structure - note the order (another quirk) | Settings screen |
To cap it all off, scanning the library is not consistent, which often results in some formats not scanning, and some scanning incompletely. An example – I have 3 albums by We Came As Strangers. In track mode all the tracks are listed, and they all play. In Album mode, all details are listed and they all play. In artist mode, not all the tracks are shown (some albums just show the first track of each album), and the files don’t always show – bringing errors onto the screen. Yet in folder mode (the easiest navigation method), all tracks, artists and albums are there and easy to find, and all play with no errors.
The easiest way to use the L5 Pro is to use folder mode for most operations and song mode for entire library shuffle.
[size=inherit][/size] | ||
Play sequence settings | EQ screen - jazz EQ is handy (adds upper mid emphasis) | Audio output options |
The play screen is a lot more straight forward, and shows album art, the gain mode being used, the bit depth and sample rate, whether EQ is engaged, as long as your tags are recognised - the title and artist, but strangely not the album name. Then you have track time, total time, a position indicator, and play/pause, previous and next on screen buttons (you could also use the side tactile buttons). The previous / next buttons can also be used to scrub forward and backward. Pretty easy to operate and straight-forward. What would make it better would be to make the gain and EQ on screen indicators selectable – so that they would take you to the appropriate settings screen. Something to think about perhaps?
In the settings screens, you have the choice of:
- Play mode (the usual repeat, sequential, repeat all, or shuffle)
- Equaliser (only presets – rock, pop, classic, bass and jazz)
- Visualisations – select either ID3 (tagged) or lyrics (I didn’t test this).
- Audio Output Settings (gain, SPDIF, DOP over SPDIF, digital filters, output phase)
- Update the media library
- Advanced – which has sub-menus for:
- Display (screen brightness and light timer)
- Language selection
- Auto shutdown settings
- A sleep timer
- Key settings (including programming the two user configurable buttons)
- USB mode (DAC or MSC/storage mode)
- Default settings (reset everything to default)
- System info
Rather than go through everything in extreme detail, I’ll explain a couple of features further, and list some of the bugs.
User configurable buttons
By far the coolest feature – you can choose the default action of two of the top buttons – and the choices are pretty good and include things like the gain, or digital filter, or the play mode. It’s a pity that EQ wasn’t one of the choices. But it is a nice feature, and I have one currently mapped to the explorer screen and one to the now playing screen.
Gain
There are 5 gain settings – Ultra-Low, Low, Med, High and Ultra-high. I measured the different settings with an SPL meter and 1 kHz test tone, and they translate to (using a set of Oriveti primary IEMs – at 11 ohm and 107 dB/ mW sensitivity):
| Ultra-low | Low | Med | High | Ultra-high |
dB reading | 72.3 | 78.3 | 81.3 | 84.3 | 85.8 |
delta vs prev | 0 | +6.0 | +3.0 | +3.0 | +1.5 |
total delta | 0 | +6.0 | +9.0 | +12.0 | +13.5 |
Digital Filters
You have the choice of 3 digital filters – fast attenuation, slow attenuation and super-slow attenuation. I tried each with quite a few different tracks, and couldn’t really tell the difference – this may just mean my ears are less sensitive to the attenuation range. The good news is that the filters are also able to be set before you use DAC mode, so I switched to the DAC, enabled the filters and measured the fast and super-slow. I graphed them so you can see the effect, and when I saw the level of drop-off for both filters, I immediately rechecked using my E17K (which I’ve also shown) – it’s the flat green line. So the default roll-off with the L5 Pro appears to start around 4-5kHz no matter which filter you use, and roll down by about 5dB at ~ 15kHz and continue rolling steeper after that.
[size=inherit][/size] | ||
DAC frequency response | Super slow vs fast attenuation | Also measuring E17K to check measuring equipment |
I’d love it if you could turn the filters off altogether and see if it also measured dead flat without them engaged, but it appears one must be engaged at all times. The one thing I will say is that despite the curve (or maybe because of it), the L5 Pro still sounds wonderful.
Play formats
L&P actually state the formats that are supported, but also state that “part of supported format need worked with the later upgrade software”. From my testing, that is a pretty accurate statement. APE, MP3, and ALAC all played perfectly and tags were recognised (apart from the odd glitch). AIFF wasn’t recognised and would not play. AAC256 was recognised as far as tags go – but wouldn’t play. FLAC and DSD played perfectly, but wouldn’t recognise artist or album tags for me. My tagging is meticulous, and the same tags are recognised by practically all other players I have. And to go further, the ALAC files I used were transcoded from the FLAC files, so the tagging was identical – it just wasn’t recognised by the player in FLAC format. YMMV – but in this area L&P needs some serious work on consistency.
Outputs
I tested both the SPDIF out and line-out with my iDSD as DAC/amp and also simply as an amp – and the combo worked as expected, with no errors or glitches. But when it came to trying DOP mode, I simply couldn’t get a signal to play on the iDSD at all. If anyone can on their unit – please let me know how you enabled it. For me it doesn’t work.
DAC mode
With the latest software update L&P enabled the DA mode with the L5 Pro. Using it is simply a matter of switching the USB to this mode in settings, and plugging into the USB port of your computer or laptop. At this stage, the OS (Windows 10) loads a generic driver, and you are limited to 16/44.1 (redbook). But it does work perfectly without having to load any custom driver. To my ears (subjectively), the L5 Pro in this mode still sounds really good – smooth, organic, rich. More on this shortly.
Missing Features
For a DAP in this price range, we’ve listed some of the features it has, and some of the glitches, so maybe we should also highlight some of the things the L5 Pro is missing.
- There is no gapless
- There is no folder play-through (I find this very frustrating)
- There is no playlist support
- The preset EQs aren’t bad, but there is no user customisable EQ option
Closing Thoughts on GUI / Features
First up – L&P should be congratulated on the progress they’ve made with the L5 Pro. The GUI is easy to use, reasonably intuitive, and if you’re prepared to accept some glitches and missing basic features, it is a lot better to navigate than some of the other DAPs out there. But while they are improvements, and I believe L&P are working hard to improve further (I hope the fw updates keep coming), at the price point they have pitched the LP5 Pro we as users should expect better. If I had to give a stand along mark for the GUI – it would be a 5/10 at best. It has great potential though.
POWER
The L5 Pro’s power output settings aren’t listed, so I decided to try some real world tests. Firstly – it handles all my IEMs with consummate ease – even the very sensitive Oriveti Primacy and DUNU DN2000J. So finesse is a strong point, and the ability to drop the gain low is a real plus. So the real test was going to be performance with harder to drive headphones.
With my HD600s, the L5Pro set on high gain, and the volume at 43/60, the HD600 was at a very listenable average dB level of 70-75 dB with peaks at 80-85 dB. If I cranked it all the way to 60/60, I was well into the 90-100 dB range. But more than that, the HD600s sounded as good as out of my iDSD, and perhaps even better (that’s how close it is). At no time did they sound under-driven, flabby, or peaky. In fact, the HD600 with the L5 Pro is a subjectively excellent pairing IMHO.
Switching to the 600 ohm Beyer T1 and once again I was impressed by the pairing with the L5Pro. I did need an extra couple of clicks (45/60) to get similar SPL levels, but once again the dynamics were very good. In direct comparison with the super powerful iDSD I’m not noticing any shortfalls in presentation. So far with the L5 Pro, I’ve had no need to even think about using an add-on amp. For my headphones, there simply is no need.
BATTERY
From fully charged, I connected my HD600, set the output impedance to high, selected a redbook FLAC album, and set it to repeat. The volume used was normal listening volume (43/60). Uninterrupted, with the screen mostly off, gave me just a little over 10 hours play. Repeating the test on low gain with my Adel U6 (32/60), and this increased to just under 11.5 hours. Charging time varied depending on the walwart I was using, but typically 3.5 hours would get a full charge from empty.
COMPARISONS/SOUND
So now to the crunch, and also to the most subjective part of the review. How does the L5 Pro sound to me after the last 3 months with it? The following is a generalisation only – because obviously each headphone you pair sounds different, but over time it is possible to sum these in your own thoughts and describe a general signature.
If I was to summarise it, I would say that the L5 Pro sounds slightly warm, rich and full bodied, with very good detail, but without having this accentuated or spot-lit. It doesn’t mask anything or have anything even close to a metallic or brittle edge. Instead you get a beautifully smooth yet clear and detailed presentation.
The background seems to be very black, and this helps with a sense of imaging, instrument separation (some call this layering) and the ability to let a headphone and recording’s sound stage interpretation shine through. Playing Amber Rubarth’s binaural track Tundra whilst at the same time testing Sennheiser’s HD630 VB was brilliant, but the HD600 was where the L5 Pro really shone with a sense of spaciousness. The two are just magic together.
L5 Pro and IEMs
I’ve tried the L5 Pro with a variety of IEMs, and IMO it has better sonics with the IEMs I tried (U6, Alclair Curve2, DUNU 2000J, Jays q-Jays) than the more expensive LP5 did.
The brighter IEMs like the 2000J were absolutely excellent, but it was a warmer, fuller, lusher presentation than I would normally expect from the 2000J. This was actually a really nice change, and one that really appealed to me. The q-Jays were also similar, and I was worried that they would be a little too smooth – but although the presentation was slightly different to what I was used to on other DAPs, again it was a presentation that was absolutely fatigue free and easy to listen to for hours. The Alclair Curve 2 and Adel U6 were both a little darker, and it was when I was playing around with the preset EQ settings discovered that the Jazz setting (for my tastes) was perfect with both IEMs. In fact my personal favourite IEM pairing overall with the L5 Pro would be the Adel U6 on the Jazz EQ setting. The dynamics, bass slam, and glorious presentation of vocals were simply sublime.
Directly comparing the LP5 and L5 Pro with IEMs and I have to admit I’m enjoying the L5 Pro a little more. It’s hard to describe, but I’d say the L5 Pro is a little more dynamic, and surprisingly it also sounds a little smoother and more organic with the IEM’s I’ve tried.
Comparing with Fiio’s X7 and this time it is absolutely dependent on the IEM and if I’m using EQ or not. Both DAPs are incredibly clean, clear, and utterly enjoyable to listen to. For uneq’d sound in a direct comparison, I prefer the 2000J with the L5Pro, and the others with the X7 – but in reality all are really close overall, and it’s simply coming down to preference.
If I introduce L5 Pros Jazz EQ setting with my slightly darker IEMs, then the L5 Pro nudges slightly ahead.
L5 Pro and Full Sized Cans
You’ve already read my thoughts on pairing with both the HD600 and T1, so I won’t go over old ground. Where the L5 Pro skips ahead of the LP5 with IEMs, the tables are reversed with full sized cans for me. The additional power and expansiveness of the LP5 is utterly engaging for me – especially with the HD600. The L5 Pro is still wonderful, and easily outclasses the X7 with its IEM module in this contest (more organic, smooth, spacious and detailed), but still falls short of the LP5. Those who’ve heard the LP5 Gold will know what I mean. It’s like having a full sized hi-fi system in your pocket.
VALUE & CONCLUSION
Remember way earlier in the review when I listed what I would look for in a high end DAP? Well here we are at the end of the review and it’s time to see how the L&P L5 Pro performed.If we look first at the build quality and aesthetics, the L5 Pro gets extremely high marks. For me it is really a beautiful and robust design, and the materials used are definitely high end.
The practical features like storage and battery life are also what I would expect given the overall output power, and it definitely has enough storage for my uses. If I was to need more storage, I think we’d need to do something a little more about the GUI and navigation anyway. Storage and battery life may not be exceptional, but they are adequate given the competition.
The sonics and power are exemplary and the real strength of the L5 Pro – delivering a rich, organic sonic experience, but with plenty of detail. It’s a sound you can fall in love with easily. And the power delivery is perfect for those looking for a standalone DAP to drive both IEMs and full sized cans.
Which leaves us with the UI, and the features (or lack of them) – and this ultimately is the L5 Pro’s Achilles heel. Whilst the UI is relatively easy to navigate, it is slightly cumbersome, and the need to rely on workarounds for missing or incomplete features (I had to rebuild my library in ALAC to use tagging properly). The good news is that improving this experience can be delivered via firmware updates, and L&P seem to be reasonably active in trying to improve the user experience.
So that leaves the questions – is it worth $800 of your hard earned money, and how does it rate overall. If you’re comparing to some of the more boutique player in the +1K range, then I’d suggest that it’s likely the L5 Pro will more than hold its own sonically, but $800 also puts the L5 Pro squarely against the X7 in this price bracket. Assuming Fiio’s add-on amps might add another $100 - $150 max to the price of the X7, and all of a sudden you have a real battle on your hands.
At the moment I’d personally take the cheaper and far easier to use and more fully featured X7, although if L&P continue to update the L5 Pro over the coming year, the two DAPs might end up sharing the crown in this price sector.
But based on current performance – I’d rate the L5 Pro close to perfect on sound, power, build, and looks, but merely average on current UI and bugs. 70% or 3.5 stars from me. If you’re willing to forgive it’s currently eccentricities though, I would still recommend the L5 Pro on sonic performance alone.
FINAL THANKS
Thanks for sticking with me through another long review. I would once again like to pass my thanks to Alex (Twister6) for recommending me as a reviewer to L&P, John Yang for facilitating the review unit, and Mr Wan for creating such an incredible sounding player.
on a separate note, I noticed you referenced the Adel U6, which I am VERY curious about...would a review be in the works?
Thanks again!