You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Kiwi Ears Aether
- Added by Cinder
- Create date
GREQ
Headphoneus Supremus
Pros: Reference tuning
Big soundstage
Very detailed
Excellent cable
High sensitivity
Design? :P
Big soundstage
Very detailed
Excellent cable
High sensitivity
Design? :P
Cons: Large shells won't fit everyone
Kiwi Ears Aether
- For the watchers -
Introduction & Disclaimer
Every few years, a new technology, piece of equipment, or device appears within the high-end audio space that shakes things up and leaves a watershed moment on headphone history.
In 1979 it was the STAX SR-Lamdba; the first headphone to ever offer something actually resembling linear tonal response.
In 1989, Sony proved that high end audio wasn't limited to open back design with the very much closed-back MDR-R10.
In 1991, Sennheiser established the legendary comfortable middle-ground benchmark and the foundation of the HD600 series, the HD580 Precision.
Now, I don't have the clairvoyance to predict whether the Aether will go down in history, spawn a legacy or change the audio industry forever, but I think it damn well should.
This may well be the most important IEM yet made.
This sample was sent by Kiwi Ears for the purpose of this review.
Website + Specs - https://kiwiears.com/products/kiwi-ears-aether
Build, Design & Aesthetics
Kiwi Ears has opted for a more rounded design for the 3D-printed resin shells of the Aether, adorned with milled aluminium and glittery resin faceplates.
The housings feature metal nozzles (6.4mm), one ear-side vent, and 3 forward facing vents. Despite the extra venting, I didn't notice any interference from wind, but neither did I find these any less isolating than the average IEM, which was at least a welcome relief.
I didn't have any problem with the ergonomics, however they don't provide the most snug fit either. I think as long as you're not adverse to larger housings, these should provide a relatively easy wearing experience.
Housed within the shells are one of the largest planar drivers ever produced for a closed-type in ear monitor out of China, at 15.3mm.
They are also sensitive enough to be driven directly from a smartphone without the assistance of a dongle DAC amplifier.
The cable is fantastic.
It's pliable, doesn't retain memory and fits the aesthetic.
It’s also thicker than average, so it doesn’t tangle as easily as even the KE4 cable.
The new and improved carry case arrives in a timely manner for the first new IEMs of 2025 and the cherry on top is the inclusion of 3 different sets of tips to ensure the best fit is found.
The Sound
So how does it sound?
There is only one way to describe the way my ears hear this IEM.
It is a reference model.
I hate to use such an overly abused term, but every so often, it's important to re-establish personal or public benchmarks that the masses vastly agree upon.
Sometimes there are headphones that absolutely deserve such attention but simply fall out of the mainstream due to lack of interest, bad marketing or one bad review from a prolific journalist.
I hope this won't be one such case, as for the first time in my life I find myself listening to an In Ear Monitor that not only presents audio without any one singular frequency or tonal band reaching out for attention or shying away, but does so without making significant compromise.
It feels like for once, the marketing team actually didn’t lie.
This is what Kiwi Ears had to say about the Aether - “Its studio-tuned sound signature provides a clean sub-bass response, flat midrange, and a natural treble peak for clear, balanced audio.”
I can only fully agree.
For lack of a better word, the Aether sounds neutral, but not in the way the AKG K612 Pro or Hifiman Susvara sounds neutral and sucks all the joy out of the music.
The Aether serves up every single part of the music on equal terms with just a hint of smoothness and an uncommonly large soundstage.
It just sounds right.
(measured on miniDSP EARS, so treble is unnaturally emphasised in the graph)

Comparisons
Kiwi Ears KE4
The darling of the so-called meta-tuning pales against the uncontaminated purity reproduced by the Aether. The upper mid-range and treble particularly suffers from some unwanted tonal characteristics that some might describe as BA timbre, with a slightly plastic quality.

Kiwi Ears Orchestra Lite
The Orchestra Lite continues to wow me with it’s slightly holographic imaging and seductively hyper-realistic presentation of midrange, but we know it’s not a reference tuning.
The Aether more than confirms this.

Hifiman HE-500
The Aether reminds me most of the qualities I enjoy with my personal reference headphone, a modified Hifiman HE-500.
In fact switching between the two, I detect only an incremental increase in warmth in my HE-500, which I should mention is also modified, so it is more linear, a touch warmer and with smoother treble than a stock HE-500.
The uncanniness of overall timbre and tonality between these two is ridiculous, with the Aether falling only slightly behind, where treble sounds like cymbals are incrementally darker and weightier than the HE-500.
Conclusions
In a time where truly high-end personal audio has never been so competitive, expensive, and littered with some quite frankly laughably bad offerings, the Kiwi Ears Aether is an oasis of sanity.
At $169 this is truly the first ‘people's reference IEM’ not hindered by poor build quality, awkward design decisions or restricted imaging and soundstage, and I believe it will become a benchmark for many IEM enthusiasts.
I really wonder if the big companies are ever going to respond, because the Chinese IEM industry overtook the consumer portion around 15 years ago and have been doing nothing but sprinting ahead ever since and now it seems they can’t keep up.
As a final footnote, I feel like I need to add that these are just my opinions and you don't have to agree with them.
There are also people out there who actually enjoy the DT990 Pro and the B+W P9, so while enjoyers of these obviously inferior headphones (
) might not quite be the Aether's target audience, anyone who appreciates the kind of truly rare neutral tunings offered by a select few high-end planars, a handful of electrostatics and even fewer dynamic headphones, then the Aether should be one for serious consideration at any starting budget.
The Aether receives my absolute fullest recommendation.

- For the watchers -
Introduction & Disclaimer
Every few years, a new technology, piece of equipment, or device appears within the high-end audio space that shakes things up and leaves a watershed moment on headphone history.
In 1979 it was the STAX SR-Lamdba; the first headphone to ever offer something actually resembling linear tonal response.
In 1989, Sony proved that high end audio wasn't limited to open back design with the very much closed-back MDR-R10.
In 1991, Sennheiser established the legendary comfortable middle-ground benchmark and the foundation of the HD600 series, the HD580 Precision.
Now, I don't have the clairvoyance to predict whether the Aether will go down in history, spawn a legacy or change the audio industry forever, but I think it damn well should.
This may well be the most important IEM yet made.
This sample was sent by Kiwi Ears for the purpose of this review.
Website + Specs - https://kiwiears.com/products/kiwi-ears-aether
Build, Design & Aesthetics
Kiwi Ears has opted for a more rounded design for the 3D-printed resin shells of the Aether, adorned with milled aluminium and glittery resin faceplates.
The housings feature metal nozzles (6.4mm), one ear-side vent, and 3 forward facing vents. Despite the extra venting, I didn't notice any interference from wind, but neither did I find these any less isolating than the average IEM, which was at least a welcome relief.
I didn't have any problem with the ergonomics, however they don't provide the most snug fit either. I think as long as you're not adverse to larger housings, these should provide a relatively easy wearing experience.
Housed within the shells are one of the largest planar drivers ever produced for a closed-type in ear monitor out of China, at 15.3mm.
They are also sensitive enough to be driven directly from a smartphone without the assistance of a dongle DAC amplifier.
The cable is fantastic.
It's pliable, doesn't retain memory and fits the aesthetic.
It’s also thicker than average, so it doesn’t tangle as easily as even the KE4 cable.
The new and improved carry case arrives in a timely manner for the first new IEMs of 2025 and the cherry on top is the inclusion of 3 different sets of tips to ensure the best fit is found.

The Sound
So how does it sound?
There is only one way to describe the way my ears hear this IEM.
It is a reference model.
I hate to use such an overly abused term, but every so often, it's important to re-establish personal or public benchmarks that the masses vastly agree upon.
Sometimes there are headphones that absolutely deserve such attention but simply fall out of the mainstream due to lack of interest, bad marketing or one bad review from a prolific journalist.
I hope this won't be one such case, as for the first time in my life I find myself listening to an In Ear Monitor that not only presents audio without any one singular frequency or tonal band reaching out for attention or shying away, but does so without making significant compromise.

It feels like for once, the marketing team actually didn’t lie.
This is what Kiwi Ears had to say about the Aether - “Its studio-tuned sound signature provides a clean sub-bass response, flat midrange, and a natural treble peak for clear, balanced audio.”
I can only fully agree.
For lack of a better word, the Aether sounds neutral, but not in the way the AKG K612 Pro or Hifiman Susvara sounds neutral and sucks all the joy out of the music.
The Aether serves up every single part of the music on equal terms with just a hint of smoothness and an uncommonly large soundstage.
It just sounds right.
(measured on miniDSP EARS, so treble is unnaturally emphasised in the graph)

Comparisons
Kiwi Ears KE4
The darling of the so-called meta-tuning pales against the uncontaminated purity reproduced by the Aether. The upper mid-range and treble particularly suffers from some unwanted tonal characteristics that some might describe as BA timbre, with a slightly plastic quality.

Kiwi Ears Orchestra Lite
The Orchestra Lite continues to wow me with it’s slightly holographic imaging and seductively hyper-realistic presentation of midrange, but we know it’s not a reference tuning.
The Aether more than confirms this.

Hifiman HE-500
The Aether reminds me most of the qualities I enjoy with my personal reference headphone, a modified Hifiman HE-500.
In fact switching between the two, I detect only an incremental increase in warmth in my HE-500, which I should mention is also modified, so it is more linear, a touch warmer and with smoother treble than a stock HE-500.
The uncanniness of overall timbre and tonality between these two is ridiculous, with the Aether falling only slightly behind, where treble sounds like cymbals are incrementally darker and weightier than the HE-500.

Conclusions
In a time where truly high-end personal audio has never been so competitive, expensive, and littered with some quite frankly laughably bad offerings, the Kiwi Ears Aether is an oasis of sanity.
At $169 this is truly the first ‘people's reference IEM’ not hindered by poor build quality, awkward design decisions or restricted imaging and soundstage, and I believe it will become a benchmark for many IEM enthusiasts.

I really wonder if the big companies are ever going to respond, because the Chinese IEM industry overtook the consumer portion around 15 years ago and have been doing nothing but sprinting ahead ever since and now it seems they can’t keep up.
As a final footnote, I feel like I need to add that these are just my opinions and you don't have to agree with them.
There are also people out there who actually enjoy the DT990 Pro and the B+W P9, so while enjoyers of these obviously inferior headphones (

The Aether receives my absolute fullest recommendation.

Last edited:
View previous replies…

jbfps116
@Redcarmoose, Interesting... Well I ordered one with the AE coupons... we shall see how it fares! The TD20 has even more impactful bass than the Wu, but lacks the treble twinklies that the Wu has. I'm looking forward to a more reference IEM because ... I'm not sure ANY of my IEMs really qualify for that category. EDIT: I think the Wu lacks a little mid-bass punch in SOME cases.

Redcarmoose
@jbfps116,
Well the Wu was my favorite Planar for about 1.5 years so it was important to bring it out to challenge the new blood. That Wu mid bass is there, where now it is more sub, but because of all bass being more and staged and forward it seems like more? IMO
Well the Wu was my favorite Planar for about 1.5 years so it was important to bring it out to challenge the new blood. That Wu mid bass is there, where now it is more sub, but because of all bass being more and staged and forward it seems like more? IMO

sofastreamer
the graph reminds me of what paul barton from psb described when talking about the "room feel" technology of the NAD Viso headphones, which basically is a tuning philosophy. he said, that a perfect graph would be a a continuously dropping line from subbass to treble. and this could be a close approach to that
Cinder
Formerly known as Res-Reviews
Pros: Clean, transparent sound signature
Excellent detail retrieval
Exceptionally articulate vocal range
Easy to drive
Excellent price-to-performance ratio
Excellent detail retrieval
Exceptionally articulate vocal range
Easy to drive
Excellent price-to-performance ratio
Cons: Sub-par included eartips, no foam eartips
Included carrying case doesn’t leave much room for accessories
Large shells are ergonomically lacking
Included carrying case doesn’t leave much room for accessories
Large shells are ergonomically lacking

Kiwi Ears Aether Review: Next Plane of Existence
Kiwi Ears Raises the Bar for… Everyone
Kiwi Ears is the in-house brand for popular ChiFi (Chinese HiFi) retailer Linsoul. They’ve released a lot of IEMs since inception, many of which have become well-known crowd-favorites in the HiFi community. They were among the first on the scene to build planar-driver hybrid IEMs, and while those products had some room for improvement, that didn’t dissuade Kiwi Ears from continuing to explore the technology. Today we’re taking a look at Kiwi Ears’ newest and most robust planar-driver IEM. Featuring a massive 15.3mm planar driver and promising uncompromising studio-grade performance, the Aether has caught the attention of a lot of folks. But, does it perform in line with its promises? Let’s find out!
You can find the Aether for sale at Linsoul for $170.
About My Preferences: This review is a subjective assessment and is therefore tinged by my personal preferences. While I try to mitigate this as much as possible during my review process, I’d be lying if I said my biases are completely erased. So for you, my readers, keep this in mind:
- My ideal sound signature would be one with competent sub-bass, a textured mid-bass, a slightly warm midrange, and an extended treble.
- I have mild treble sensitivity.
Tech Specs
- Driver: 15.3mm neodynium planar driver
- Cable: 0.78mm detachable w/ 3.5mm termination
- Impedance: 14 ohms
- Sensitivity: 105db SPL/mW
- Frequency Response: 20Hz-20KHz
Sound Signature
Sonic Overview:
The Aether features open, airy, reference-style tuning. Its treble is well-extended and organic. Its midrange is neutral, with slight emphasis in the 2–3KHz range to bring out instrumental and vocal details. Its bass is extended, though not emphasized much. There’s a slight 1–2db lift in the mid-bass that provides solid lower-register articulation that carries out to the 20Hz range. The Aether’s studio-grade tuning allows it to express a wide soundstage with excellent depth and laying. Its new 15.3mm driver delivers excellent planar-driver timbre with all of the usual psycho-acoustic properties you’d associate with a high-quality planar driver.Sonic Breakdown:
Treble: Songs used: In One Ear, Midnight City, Outlands, Satisfy, Little One, Show Me How To Live (Live at the Quart Festival), Bittersweet SymphonyThe Aether is one of those IEMs that, for most people, will make you say “wow, I’ve never heard that in this song before!”. That’s in no small part a feature of the Aether’s incredibly transparent and articulate treble. The Aether’s upper-register is genuinely reminiscent of full-sized planar headphones in that its spares no effort in providing maximum speed and near-flawless control. It isn’t just detailed, either. The Aether’s treble is even and organic, almost never sounding too hot, sharp, or over-blown.
This isn’t all smoke and hype — you can look into my past writing to see that I rarely get swept up in marketing-driven excitement. It doesn’t really matter what track you throw at the Aether as it will resolve it well. Tracks like Bittersweet Symphony represent but a trivial challenge for the Aether’s massive drivers. The song’s beautiful cacophony of string instrumentation and percussion is carefully, surgically even, layered by the Aether. Gone is the impenetrable wall of treble noise found with lesser IEMs — instead listeners are presented with a proper symphony.
The lonely electric synth lines of Midnight City cut through its bleak, dark background with precision and intent. The Aether’s incredible attack and decay speeds complement the echo-filled vibes of M83’s performance, truly delivering a faithful reproduction of their legendary track. This song is one that is easy to get wrong, and many planar IEMs I’ve tested sounded sharp at the edges of the synth effects. The Aether is free from sharpness and hotness which is a boon to treble-sensitive listeners like me.
Midrange: Songs used: Flagpole Sitta, Jacked Up, I Am The Highway, Dreams, Too Close, Little Black Submarines, Bohemian Rhapsody, Cash Machine, Chasm
As with its treble, the Aether’s midrange is incredibly detailed and evenly-toned. This is an IEM with a truly “perceived neutral” midrange that refuses to play favorites. Jacked Up’s wide assortment of instruments do a good job of exercising the Aether’s midrange muscles. The track’s vocals are highly intelligible, with almost every inflection in delivery captured by the Aether’s drivers. The tracks two pianos clamor together in the background, each sitting in their own distinct spot on the sound stage. Each note springs into existence with clarity and precision and fades out organically. Percussion is likewise rendered impressively; drum slams and kicks are remarkably distinct and well-bodied.
I had anticipated that the Aether’s reference-style tuning would make Flagpole Sitta and its dry-mastered ilk a boring listen, but that doesn’t seem to be the case. The Aether so rigorously captures detail that the track becomes rich in tone and texture, not simple warmth. This style-agnostic prowess gives the Aether a special place in my rotation and is a major part of why I like it so much.
Bass: Songs used: Moth, Gold Dust, In For The Kill (Skream Remix), War Pigs (Celldweller Remix), Feeling Like The End
The Aether’s bass is slightly emphasized, with a mild 1–2db lift over its lower midrange. This gives the Aether a solid lower register with the occasional capacity for punch and rumble. For a reference-tuned IEM, this quantity of bass is plenty. It adds much needed weight and substance to tracks and does a great job at minimizing dryness. Even electronic music is well-served by this tuning. Sure, it might be more fun to crank the bass, but the Aether doesn’t sound flat nor anemic. From the perspective of a critical listener, the Aether does bass extraordinarily well, even for fat dubstep drops.
I often write about bass “shape” and “control”. These are concepts that ultimately boil down to how precisely the IEMs driver(s) can produce bass and how well the acoustic cavity minimizes distortion and decay. The Aether’s bass is extremely quick and precise. Its healthy portioning combined with its speed makes it, at this price, uniquely adept at resolving subtle bass queues. Its precision allows it render nearly-tactile effects. For example, the Aether resolves Joji’s bass element in Feeling Like The End at 0:52 with a seemingly physical exhale. This is extremely subtle effect that is easy to miss outside of critical listening, but wow, I wasn’t anticipating such an affordable IEM to possess this level of technical ability. In fact, none of my other IEMs could replicate this sensation.
Packaging / Unboxing



Kiwi Ears usually sticks to fairly basic packaging for their IEMs, so I was pleasantly surprised to find that the Aether’s has a more-premium look and feel. Each surface below the outer-sheathe makes excellent use of a semi-textured, partially-reflective silver cardboard. It does a good job of emulating the look of brushed aluminum/stainless steel.
Build
Construction Quality

The faceplates on the Aether are down-right gorgeous. Every inch of the Aether’s shells, apart from its nozzles is made out of plastic — but that doesn’t make it look or feel “un-premium”.


The Aether’s nozzles are, mercifully, made out of metal. They are a little above-average in depth and size. Below the nozzle’s lip sits a metal perforated debris filter. The filter sits securely and looks to be capable of repelling most dust, dirt, and viscous fluids. The top-face of the Aether’s shells houses a the IEMs 2-pin sockets and primary vent. Be aware that the primary vent is large and can very easily accumulate finger/skin oils, dirt, or (rain) water.



I was hoping that the Aether would come with a cable similar to the Orchestra Lite, but alas, we get a simple, but well-designed, black plastic cable. It features 0.78mm 2-pin connectors housed in a standard black shell, a black-plastic Y-splitter, and a 3.5mm termination housed in a black metal shell.
Power
The Aether’s impedance is rated at a shockingly low 14ohms. That puts its squarely in “easy to drive” territory, especially when combined with its incredibly reasonable sensitivity. Apple’s USB-C adapter is more that capable of driving the Aether at, or near, full quality. Meze’s Alba dongle is likewise plenty powerful. The Aether had zero hiss and a very dark noise floor on all sources I tested, so even pedestrian 3.5mm sources should work well.Comfort
Disclaimer: comfort is a highly individual metric — no two people will have the same experience.By virtue of the Aether’s massive planar driver, it also has large shells. They’re of average ergonomic design and not too hard for me to wear for extended listening sessions. I highly recommend experimenting with ear variety of eartip, and perhaps some aftermarket ones, to get as strong of a passive seal as possible.
Accessories

Inside the box you’ll find:
- 1x semi-hard carrying case
- 1x 3.5mm cable
- 9x pairs of silicone eartips


The eartips that Kiwi Ears include in the box are serviceable, but not great. In fact, one eartip I tried to apply actually tore while placing it on the Aether’s nozzle. Thankfully I have plenty of spares, but its an irritating experience nonetheless.
The Aether’s case is fairly standard, though it is larger than the one that came with my previous Kiwi Ears IEMs by a smidge. A slightly roomier case would have been great considering I always carry the Aether with a USB-C adapter.
Comparisons
1: NFAcous NM20 ($120)The NM20 is another “reference-style” IEM, though it features a single dynamic driver instead of a planar driver. It also comes in at nearly $50 cheaper, making it noticeably more affordable. The NM20 has smaller shells, a better-looking and feeling cable, and a better-fitting case. The Aether’s ergonomics may be worse, but it posses undeniably superior technical capabilities. Its soundstage is wider, treble more extended, bass more precise; there’s a laundry list of performance advantages.
From a purely analytical perspective, the Aether is the better tool for mastering, studio work, etc. That said, the NM20’s bassier, more V-shaped sound signature may appeal to those who want a somewhat more-mainstream tuning. Its superior ergonomics may also sway an potential buyer, particularly if he/she is sensitive to the bump in price for the Aether.
2: BQEYZ Frost ($180)
BQEYZ’s Frost is a very unique IEM that brings non-standard tuning to the table. It is slightly more expensive than the Aether and packs a better cable, aluminum + glass shells, and a larger carrying case. Its ergonomics are similar to the Aether’s, though the added weight of aluminum does tire the back of the ear faster. BQEYZ’s included eartips are more comfortable for me and seal better than the standard Kiwi Ears assortment that was included with the Aether.
Sound-wise, both IEMs possess serious technical chops. The Frost does a great job at unifying its flat, warm, midrange with a sparkly and robust treble. It has an intensely organic lower register that is slightly more emphasized than the Aether. The Aether, by comparison, is a cooler, more analytical IEM. Its treble is more even and further extended, while its midrange is far more neutral and lacking the Frost’s signature warmth. In terms of sound staging, both IEMs are great performers with the Aether pulling ahead in both depth and width.
Conclusion
The Aether raises the bar for the entire IEM industry. It represents a tectonic shift in what consumers can expect in both tonal purity and technical prowess per dollar. The fact that Kiwi Ears is selling the Aether for a mere $170 should do well to light a fire under both Eastern and Western brands. The Aether’s capacity to resolve detail eclipses many much more expensive IEMs both old and new alike. While not everyone wants an analytical IEM, those who are willing to give reference-style tuning simply cannot go wrong with the Aether.Who This is For
- Audiophiles who want reference-grade sound
- Listeners who enjoy neutral sound signatures
- Planar-driver enthusiasts
Who This isn’t For
- Bassheads
- Listeners with small ears
- Those who crave warm sound signatures
Last edited:

jbfps116
Wow... so the Aether has even less bass punch than the Frost?! I thought that one was lighter in the bass. [never heard either.] I just don't want to spend this money on anemic bass that gets overshadowed by the treble... [I'm casually interested in Frost, and more interested in Aether]

Cinder
@jbfps116 My policy is to only use the included eartips in the box during the review, so that impact my comparisons.
The Aether is not anemic and its bass is not overshadowed by treble in any way. Neither IEM could be considered bassy, but most of my tracks had slightly stronger mid bass response from the Frost. That said, the Aether's performance was tighter, better controlled, and imo tonally superior.
Again, neither IEM is bassy, but both have bass. If you're looking for the best possible tonal balance, then I recommend the Aether.
The Aether is not anemic and its bass is not overshadowed by treble in any way. Neither IEM could be considered bassy, but most of my tracks had slightly stronger mid bass response from the Frost. That said, the Aether's performance was tighter, better controlled, and imo tonally superior.
Again, neither IEM is bassy, but both have bass. If you're looking for the best possible tonal balance, then I recommend the Aether.