Reviews by Sonic Sleuth
I would like to thank @gadgetgod and ConceptKart for sending this unit as part of the review tour.
You can purchase it from ConceptKart at the following link (not an affiliate link):
https://conceptkart.com/products/quloos-mub1-bluetooth-portable-usb-dac-amp
Also, I’m not a seasoned reviewer or a seasoned audiophile, so whatever I say are purely my observations and your results may vary.
I’m not the one to usually focus on specifications and numbers. I focus more on how happy I am with the equipment’s sound and that’s it.
Introduction:
Quloos, formerly QLS HiFi, based in ShenZhen, China, specializes in high-end audio equipment. Their latest offering, the MUB1, is an all-in-one portable audio solution. Compact yet powerful, it functions as a USB DAC/Amp.
Physical Unit:
The MUB1 boasts a sleek aluminum alloy shell with glass panels, housing four high-performance 32-bit DAC chips and amp chips. It features a small OLED screen, hardware buttons for controls, and various output options, all packed into a pocket-friendly design.
Specifications:
Equipped with CS43131 decoding chips, the MUB1 supports high-resolution audio up to 32-Bit/384kHz PCM and Native DSD256. It offers multiple digital filters and a balanced headphone amp architecture with impressive power output.
Dynamic Range (Balanced/Single-ended)
132dB/126dB
Output Power (Balanced/Single-ended)
1100mW+1100mW@32Ω/250mW+250mW@300Ω
410mW+410mW@32Ω/65mW+65mW@300Ω
Battery life and usage:
The MUB1 boasts a 2500mAh battery that provides up to 10 hours of playback time. It features two USB Type-C ports, one for charging and another for digital input or power bank function. The device can charge other devices connected to it, making it a versatile companion for extended listening sessions on the go. Additionally, users can bypass the battery and power the MUB1 directly from the charging port, enhancing its long-term battery health and lifespan.
In real-world usage, the MUB1 delivers impressive battery performance. When using the 3.5mm single-ended output, it consistently provides approximately 9.5 to 10 hours of playback time at high gain. Similarly, with the 4.4mm balanced output, users can expect around 7.5 to 8 hours of playback time at high gain.
Sound:
I want to outright mention that this is the best implementation of CS43131 chips I’ve come across till date.
The MUB1 delivers a balanced and natural sound signature across the frequency range. Its bass is deep and controlled, midrange rich and detailed, and treble natural and crisp. The soundstage is spacious and immersive, akin to desktop devices.
Sound Performance in Bluetooth Mode:
The MUB1 surprises with its exceptional sound quality when connected via Bluetooth to compatible devices such as smartphones or tablets. Utilizing advanced codecs like LDAC, AptX HD, and AptX, the MUB1 maintains a level of sonic fidelity close to its performance in USB DAC mode. While some minor loss of dynamics and micro details may occur, the overall sonic experience remains impressive, surpassing many other Bluetooth devices in its class. Users can enjoy rich bass, transparent midrange, and smooth treble reproduction, making wireless listening a satisfying experience.
Sound Performance in USB DAC/AMP Mode:
When used as a USB DAC/AMP, the MUB1 showcases its full potential, delivering an outstanding audio performance that rivals desktop setups. With its quad CS43131 DAC configuration and meticulously designed balanced audio circuitry, the MUB1 offers exceptional clarity, detail retrieval, and tonal accuracy. The device handles various music genres with ease, delivering deep, controlled bass, natural and organic midrange, and refined, non-fatiguing treble. Its spacious soundstage and precise imaging further enhance the listening experience, providing users with a captivating and immersive sonic journey.
Tonality and Timbre:
With a realistic and organic timbre, the MUB1 excels in both instrument and vocal reproduction. It strikes a perfect balance between analytical and analog, providing vibrant and lifelike performances.
Bass:
The MUB1 impresses with its natural and powerful bass response, offering depth and impact across various music genres. It handles complex bass passages with texture and control, enhancing the listening experience.
Vocals:
From male to female vocals, the MUB1 excels in transparency and engagement. It reproduces voices with natural body and depth, making performances captivating and lively.
Treble:
The MUB1's treble performance is smooth and detailed, with a touch of warmth. It maintains clarity and definition throughout the frequency range, avoiding harshness or congestion.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the Quloos MUB1 is a versatile and powerful portable audio solution that excels in sound quality, convenience, and functionality.
You can purchase it from ConceptKart at the following link (not an affiliate link):
https://conceptkart.com/products/quloos-mub1-bluetooth-portable-usb-dac-amp
Also, I’m not a seasoned reviewer or a seasoned audiophile, so whatever I say are purely my observations and your results may vary.
I’m not the one to usually focus on specifications and numbers. I focus more on how happy I am with the equipment’s sound and that’s it.
Introduction:
Quloos, formerly QLS HiFi, based in ShenZhen, China, specializes in high-end audio equipment. Their latest offering, the MUB1, is an all-in-one portable audio solution. Compact yet powerful, it functions as a USB DAC/Amp.
Physical Unit:
The MUB1 boasts a sleek aluminum alloy shell with glass panels, housing four high-performance 32-bit DAC chips and amp chips. It features a small OLED screen, hardware buttons for controls, and various output options, all packed into a pocket-friendly design.
Specifications:
Equipped with CS43131 decoding chips, the MUB1 supports high-resolution audio up to 32-Bit/384kHz PCM and Native DSD256. It offers multiple digital filters and a balanced headphone amp architecture with impressive power output.
Dynamic Range (Balanced/Single-ended)
132dB/126dB
Output Power (Balanced/Single-ended)
1100mW+1100mW@32Ω/250mW+250mW@300Ω
410mW+410mW@32Ω/65mW+65mW@300Ω
Battery life and usage:
The MUB1 boasts a 2500mAh battery that provides up to 10 hours of playback time. It features two USB Type-C ports, one for charging and another for digital input or power bank function. The device can charge other devices connected to it, making it a versatile companion for extended listening sessions on the go. Additionally, users can bypass the battery and power the MUB1 directly from the charging port, enhancing its long-term battery health and lifespan.
In real-world usage, the MUB1 delivers impressive battery performance. When using the 3.5mm single-ended output, it consistently provides approximately 9.5 to 10 hours of playback time at high gain. Similarly, with the 4.4mm balanced output, users can expect around 7.5 to 8 hours of playback time at high gain.
Sound:
I want to outright mention that this is the best implementation of CS43131 chips I’ve come across till date.
The MUB1 delivers a balanced and natural sound signature across the frequency range. Its bass is deep and controlled, midrange rich and detailed, and treble natural and crisp. The soundstage is spacious and immersive, akin to desktop devices.
Sound Performance in Bluetooth Mode:
The MUB1 surprises with its exceptional sound quality when connected via Bluetooth to compatible devices such as smartphones or tablets. Utilizing advanced codecs like LDAC, AptX HD, and AptX, the MUB1 maintains a level of sonic fidelity close to its performance in USB DAC mode. While some minor loss of dynamics and micro details may occur, the overall sonic experience remains impressive, surpassing many other Bluetooth devices in its class. Users can enjoy rich bass, transparent midrange, and smooth treble reproduction, making wireless listening a satisfying experience.
Sound Performance in USB DAC/AMP Mode:
When used as a USB DAC/AMP, the MUB1 showcases its full potential, delivering an outstanding audio performance that rivals desktop setups. With its quad CS43131 DAC configuration and meticulously designed balanced audio circuitry, the MUB1 offers exceptional clarity, detail retrieval, and tonal accuracy. The device handles various music genres with ease, delivering deep, controlled bass, natural and organic midrange, and refined, non-fatiguing treble. Its spacious soundstage and precise imaging further enhance the listening experience, providing users with a captivating and immersive sonic journey.
Tonality and Timbre:
With a realistic and organic timbre, the MUB1 excels in both instrument and vocal reproduction. It strikes a perfect balance between analytical and analog, providing vibrant and lifelike performances.
Bass:
The MUB1 impresses with its natural and powerful bass response, offering depth and impact across various music genres. It handles complex bass passages with texture and control, enhancing the listening experience.
Vocals:
From male to female vocals, the MUB1 excels in transparency and engagement. It reproduces voices with natural body and depth, making performances captivating and lively.
Treble:
The MUB1's treble performance is smooth and detailed, with a touch of warmth. It maintains clarity and definition throughout the frequency range, avoiding harshness or congestion.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the Quloos MUB1 is a versatile and powerful portable audio solution that excels in sound quality, convenience, and functionality.
Attachments
Lambo970
Would love to try this sometime soon. And I guess MUB1 is actually not that big compare to those competitors with battery? Like Q15, CMA18P, etc.
Sonic Sleuth
It is very similar in size when compared to CMA18P however Q15 is much larger and heavier.
Preface:
I would like to thank @gadgetgod and Questyle for sending this unit as part of the review tour.
Also, I’m not a seasoned reviewer or a seasoned audiophile, so whatever I say are purely my observations and your results may vary.
I’m not the one to usually focus on specifications and numbers. I focus more on how happy I am with the equipment’s sound and that’s it.
Introduction:
Both versions of the M15 sound almost exactly the same. This makes sense because the M15i is meant to replace the previous model completely. It avoids having two very different versions of the M15 in circulation.
Specifications:
The M15i boasts impressive specifications that set it apart from conventional dongles. With a dynamic range of 130 dB and a THD+N of 0.0003%, it delivers unparalleled clarity and precision. Its output power can drive headphones ranging from 32 to 300 Ohms.
Frequency Response
±0.1dB (20Hz-20kHz) | ±2dB (20Hz-80kHz)
THD+N
0.0003 %
DAC
ESS flagship USB DAC chip ES9281AC
OUTPUT POWER
Physical Unit:
Crafted from CNC-machined aluminum, the unit exudes durability however the front glass is prone to scratches without the case. Its sleek profile and understated aesthetic makes it really cool to look at.
The transparent cover at the top provides a glimpse into the inner workings of the device, showcasing its high-quality components.
Despite its diminutive size, the M15i is packed with features. From the clicky and satisfying gain switch to the dual headphone jack outputs (single-ended TRS 3.5 and balanced 4.4 TRRS), every aspect of the unit is designed for convenience and versatility.
I hate having independent volume control. What I like the most in M15i is that I can control volume from my source than set the volume at the source and then use the dongle to change the volume.
The unit's USB-C port, located on the rear, allows for easy connectivity with a variety of devices, while the included fabric-jacketed Type C to Type C cable ensure reliable performance and durability.
It’s interesting to note that Questyle doesn’t include the lightning to type c cable when they’re marketing this as MFi certified dongle.
Overall, the Questyle M15i is not just a portable audio device—it's a work of art that combines form and function in perfect harmony.
Sound:
The sound quality of the M15i is nothing short of extraordinary. It offers a liquid, transparent, and high-resolution audio experience that transcends the limitations of traditional dongles. From the wide soundstage to the well-layered instrumentation, every aspect of the sound is meticulously crafted to provide an immersive listening experience.
Tonality and Timbre:
The tonality of the M15i strikes a perfect balance between warmth and neutrality, ensuring that every note is reproduced with utmost accuracy. Its timbre is rich and textured, capturing the nuances of instruments and vocals with remarkable fidelity. Whether you're listening to guitars, cellos, or vocals, the M15i excels in delivering lifelike sound reproduction.
Bass:
The bass performance of the M15i is nothing short of impressive. It offers a linear and impactful bass response, with quick and nimble transients that bring out the texture and detail in every note. From sub-bass rumble to mid-bass punch, the M15i delivers a satisfying low-end experience that complements a wide range of musical genres.
Vocals:
Vocals shine on the M15i, thanks to its smooth and full-bodied presentation. The vocals are positioned front and center within the soundstage, with a sense of depth and realism that makes them come alive. Whether you're listening to male or female vocals, the M15i ensures that every word is conveyed with emotion and clarity.
Treble:
The treble region of the M15i is detailed and nuanced, without ever veering into harshness or fatigue. It strikes a delicate balance between resolution and smoothness, ensuring that even the most intricate details in the music are preserved. Whether you're listening to classical or metal tracks, the M15's treble performance is sure to impress.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the Questyle M15i is a game-changer in the world of audio dongles. With its exceptional sound quality, versatile connectivity options, and compact design, it sets a new standard for portable audio devices. Whether you're a casual listener or a seasoned audiophile, the M15i delivers a listening experience that is nothing short of extraordinary. With its unbeatable price-to-performance ratio, it's a must-have for anyone who values high-fidelity music on the go.
I would like to thank @gadgetgod and Questyle for sending this unit as part of the review tour.
Also, I’m not a seasoned reviewer or a seasoned audiophile, so whatever I say are purely my observations and your results may vary.
I’m not the one to usually focus on specifications and numbers. I focus more on how happy I am with the equipment’s sound and that’s it.
Introduction:
Both versions of the M15 sound almost exactly the same. This makes sense because the M15i is meant to replace the previous model completely. It avoids having two very different versions of the M15 in circulation.
Specifications:
The M15i boasts impressive specifications that set it apart from conventional dongles. With a dynamic range of 130 dB and a THD+N of 0.0003%, it delivers unparalleled clarity and precision. Its output power can drive headphones ranging from 32 to 300 Ohms.
Frequency Response
±0.1dB (20Hz-20kHz) | ±2dB (20Hz-80kHz)
THD+N
0.0003 %
DAC
ESS flagship USB DAC chip ES9281AC
OUTPUT POWER
- 3.5mm:RL=300Ω | Po=11.97mW
Vout (Max)=1.895Vrms - 4.4mm:RL=300Ω | Po=22.6mW
Vout (Max)=2.624Vrms
Physical Unit:
Crafted from CNC-machined aluminum, the unit exudes durability however the front glass is prone to scratches without the case. Its sleek profile and understated aesthetic makes it really cool to look at.
The transparent cover at the top provides a glimpse into the inner workings of the device, showcasing its high-quality components.
Despite its diminutive size, the M15i is packed with features. From the clicky and satisfying gain switch to the dual headphone jack outputs (single-ended TRS 3.5 and balanced 4.4 TRRS), every aspect of the unit is designed for convenience and versatility.
I hate having independent volume control. What I like the most in M15i is that I can control volume from my source than set the volume at the source and then use the dongle to change the volume.
The unit's USB-C port, located on the rear, allows for easy connectivity with a variety of devices, while the included fabric-jacketed Type C to Type C cable ensure reliable performance and durability.
It’s interesting to note that Questyle doesn’t include the lightning to type c cable when they’re marketing this as MFi certified dongle.
Overall, the Questyle M15i is not just a portable audio device—it's a work of art that combines form and function in perfect harmony.
Sound:
The sound quality of the M15i is nothing short of extraordinary. It offers a liquid, transparent, and high-resolution audio experience that transcends the limitations of traditional dongles. From the wide soundstage to the well-layered instrumentation, every aspect of the sound is meticulously crafted to provide an immersive listening experience.
Tonality and Timbre:
The tonality of the M15i strikes a perfect balance between warmth and neutrality, ensuring that every note is reproduced with utmost accuracy. Its timbre is rich and textured, capturing the nuances of instruments and vocals with remarkable fidelity. Whether you're listening to guitars, cellos, or vocals, the M15i excels in delivering lifelike sound reproduction.
Bass:
The bass performance of the M15i is nothing short of impressive. It offers a linear and impactful bass response, with quick and nimble transients that bring out the texture and detail in every note. From sub-bass rumble to mid-bass punch, the M15i delivers a satisfying low-end experience that complements a wide range of musical genres.
Vocals:
Vocals shine on the M15i, thanks to its smooth and full-bodied presentation. The vocals are positioned front and center within the soundstage, with a sense of depth and realism that makes them come alive. Whether you're listening to male or female vocals, the M15i ensures that every word is conveyed with emotion and clarity.
Treble:
The treble region of the M15i is detailed and nuanced, without ever veering into harshness or fatigue. It strikes a delicate balance between resolution and smoothness, ensuring that even the most intricate details in the music are preserved. Whether you're listening to classical or metal tracks, the M15's treble performance is sure to impress.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the Questyle M15i is a game-changer in the world of audio dongles. With its exceptional sound quality, versatile connectivity options, and compact design, it sets a new standard for portable audio devices. Whether you're a casual listener or a seasoned audiophile, the M15i delivers a listening experience that is nothing short of extraordinary. With its unbeatable price-to-performance ratio, it's a must-have for anyone who values high-fidelity music on the go.
Sonic Sleuth
You’re absolutely right. It is M15i (corrected). It was difficult to keep up with writing ‘i’ at the end of M15 everywhere.
The volume needs to be controlled from the source (PC/Phone). You cannot adjust volume on the dongle.
The volume needs to be controlled from the source (PC/Phone). You cannot adjust volume on the dongle.
Sonic Sleuth
Hey @dgjl, thanks for reading the review. I agree the intro may have implied M15i is entirely new, but it's essentially just an MFi certified version of the M15. I've removed it temporarily for clarification.
To clarify, while there aren't significant real-world differences between M15i and M15, the M15i now boasts MFi certification. Despite my personal sound preferences, I find the M15i excels in SQ and technicalities. It caters to those who value technical details without sacrificing the 'fun' factor in music listening.
Top dongles like DC Elite, RU7, and FC6 remain relevant, offering unique sound. I've compared M15i with DC Elite and RU7 but have limited exposure to FC6. Thanks for the feedback!
To clarify, while there aren't significant real-world differences between M15i and M15, the M15i now boasts MFi certification. Despite my personal sound preferences, I find the M15i excels in SQ and technicalities. It caters to those who value technical details without sacrificing the 'fun' factor in music listening.
Top dongles like DC Elite, RU7, and FC6 remain relevant, offering unique sound. I've compared M15i with DC Elite and RU7 but have limited exposure to FC6. Thanks for the feedback!
Overview:
The Questyle CMA 18 Portable DAC/Amp showcases an intriguing blend of portability and performance, offering a sleek design, versatile connectivity, and promising sound quality. Let's delve deeper into the various aspects highlighted in the review.
I would like to thank @gadgetgod and ConceptKart for sending this unit as part of the review tour.
You can purchase it from ConceptKart at the following link (not an affiliate link):
https://conceptkart.com/products/questyle-cma18-portable-dac-amp
Also, I’m not a seasoned reviewer or a seasoned audiophile, so whatever I say are purely my observations and your results may vary.
I’m not the one to usually focus on specifications and numbers. I focus more on how happy I am with the equipment’s sound and that’s it.
Specifications:
The CMA 18 Portable presents an impressive array of technical specifications, catering to diverse audio needs. Supporting inputs via USB, Bluetooth, mini coax, optical, and 4.4mm analog line input, it provides flexibility in connectivity. Moreover, its compatibility with multiple Bluetooth codecs ensures seamless integration with various devices. Notably, the device features a headphone output power of 1W @ 32Ohms, delivering robust performance, especially with over-ear headphones.
Sound:
CMA 18p has commendable soundstage and imaging, particularly with over-ear headphones. Despite its compact size, the device delivers an immersive audio experience, accentuating bass frequencies with depth and clarity.
Vocals:
The CMA 18 strikes a balance between reference and romantic sound signatures, contributing to the natural rendering of vocals. Its ability to maintain clarity and warmth enhances the listening experience, making vocals stand out with authenticity.
Treble:
The device's refined treble performance is noted, characterized by natural extension and minimal graininess. Unlike some competitors, the device manages to deliver extended treble without causing listener fatigue, ensuring a pleasant listening experience across various genres.
Usage with Headphones:
The CMA 18 impresses with its ability to drive a wide range of headphones, from easy-to-drive models to moderately demanding ones. Despite its portable form factor, it provides ample power, elevating the listening experience with each pair of headphones used.
I particularly noted that CMA 18p paired extremely well with Planar HPs probably because of its current mode amplification.
Usage with IEMs:
While the CMA 18 excels with headphones, caution is advised for highly sensitive IEMs due to potential background noise.
It did drive moderate to extremely power demanding IEMs effortlessly.
However, for users primarily utilizing over-ear headphones, the device offers exceptional performance and versatility.
Quirks:
The battery life indicator is not accurate at all times.
I was initially disappointed that I couldn’t charge CMA18p simultaneously while playing music when connected to my laptop but later found a thread on head-fi on how to enable it.
With charging disabled in DAC/AMP mode, it drained the battery of my phone within few hours.
The back is prone to scratches and needs a case.
It is extremely slippery.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the Questyle CMA 18 Portable DAC/Amp emerges as a compelling choice in the portable audio landscape. Whether seeking advanced connectivity options or refined sound performance, the CMA 18 delivers with finesse. While not claiming absolute superiority, it presents a viable option for discerning listeners seeking a portable DAC/Amp that strikes the perfect balance between functionality and sonic excellence which is rare.
The Questyle CMA 18 Portable DAC/Amp showcases an intriguing blend of portability and performance, offering a sleek design, versatile connectivity, and promising sound quality. Let's delve deeper into the various aspects highlighted in the review.
I would like to thank @gadgetgod and ConceptKart for sending this unit as part of the review tour.
You can purchase it from ConceptKart at the following link (not an affiliate link):
https://conceptkart.com/products/questyle-cma18-portable-dac-amp
Also, I’m not a seasoned reviewer or a seasoned audiophile, so whatever I say are purely my observations and your results may vary.
I’m not the one to usually focus on specifications and numbers. I focus more on how happy I am with the equipment’s sound and that’s it.
Specifications:
The CMA 18 Portable presents an impressive array of technical specifications, catering to diverse audio needs. Supporting inputs via USB, Bluetooth, mini coax, optical, and 4.4mm analog line input, it provides flexibility in connectivity. Moreover, its compatibility with multiple Bluetooth codecs ensures seamless integration with various devices. Notably, the device features a headphone output power of 1W @ 32Ohms, delivering robust performance, especially with over-ear headphones.
Sound:
CMA 18p has commendable soundstage and imaging, particularly with over-ear headphones. Despite its compact size, the device delivers an immersive audio experience, accentuating bass frequencies with depth and clarity.
Vocals:
The CMA 18 strikes a balance between reference and romantic sound signatures, contributing to the natural rendering of vocals. Its ability to maintain clarity and warmth enhances the listening experience, making vocals stand out with authenticity.
Treble:
The device's refined treble performance is noted, characterized by natural extension and minimal graininess. Unlike some competitors, the device manages to deliver extended treble without causing listener fatigue, ensuring a pleasant listening experience across various genres.
Usage with Headphones:
The CMA 18 impresses with its ability to drive a wide range of headphones, from easy-to-drive models to moderately demanding ones. Despite its portable form factor, it provides ample power, elevating the listening experience with each pair of headphones used.
I particularly noted that CMA 18p paired extremely well with Planar HPs probably because of its current mode amplification.
Usage with IEMs:
While the CMA 18 excels with headphones, caution is advised for highly sensitive IEMs due to potential background noise.
It did drive moderate to extremely power demanding IEMs effortlessly.
However, for users primarily utilizing over-ear headphones, the device offers exceptional performance and versatility.
Quirks:
The battery life indicator is not accurate at all times.
I was initially disappointed that I couldn’t charge CMA18p simultaneously while playing music when connected to my laptop but later found a thread on head-fi on how to enable it.
With charging disabled in DAC/AMP mode, it drained the battery of my phone within few hours.
The back is prone to scratches and needs a case.
It is extremely slippery.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the Questyle CMA 18 Portable DAC/Amp emerges as a compelling choice in the portable audio landscape. Whether seeking advanced connectivity options or refined sound performance, the CMA 18 delivers with finesse. While not claiming absolute superiority, it presents a viable option for discerning listeners seeking a portable DAC/Amp that strikes the perfect balance between functionality and sonic excellence which is rare.
Attachments
Y
Yarbles
I am curious as to how this sounded as I am a big Chord fan & the Questyle M15 sounds like a 'mini Mojo 2' - it is also one of only two dongles I've ever thought was impressive (It's also the one I bought as I got it for about 100 USD 2nd hand & the other one I liked, the L&P W4 was 250 2nd hand. I hardly use a dongle so the cheaper the better).
I've heard so many people claim their new toy (OP this isn't aimed at you; you haven't claimed this) is better than a Mojo 2, but I find that very difficult to believe - recency bias is fortunately something I have become immune to & I don't think a lot of people are very good at being objective... eg I understand why people love HD600's but I personally find them dull as dishwater.
Mojo 2 cult members
have you heard this thing & how does it measure up?
I only own two portable dac/amps; a Mojo 2 & another Mojo 2 in case I lose/break/forget to charge the other.
I've heard so many people claim their new toy (OP this isn't aimed at you; you haven't claimed this) is better than a Mojo 2, but I find that very difficult to believe - recency bias is fortunately something I have become immune to & I don't think a lot of people are very good at being objective... eg I understand why people love HD600's but I personally find them dull as dishwater.
Mojo 2 cult members
have you heard this thing & how does it measure up?I only own two portable dac/amps; a Mojo 2 & another Mojo 2 in case I lose/break/forget to charge the other.
OhmsClaw
CMA18P is too noisy for IEM's unfortunately. Mojo2 reigns supreme, if even a little less convenient. (No LDAC) The CMA18P requires the leather case from the jump to protect it from sliding/scratches. Works fine with the RN6 but the EVO and Campfire offerings, the background hiss on pause with cellphone processing noises passed through is unacceptable for 700$ I really wanted a portable version of the RME ADI 2 chip, but this wasn't it. Hopefully a future revision brings the background down and I would 100% recommend it. I originally wanted to replace my BTR7 with this for in the pocket OTG LDAC use case with wired as a back up.
Colorfly CDA-M2
I would like to thank @gadgetgod and ConceptKart for sending this unit as part of the review tour.
You can purchase it from ConceptKart at the following link (not an affiliate link): https://conceptkart.com/products/colorfly-cda-m2-portable-usb-dac-amp
Also, I’m not a seasoned reviewer or a seasoned audiophile, so whatever I say are purely my observations and your results may vary.
I’m not the one to usually focus on specifications and numbers. I focus more on how happy I am with the equipment’s sound and that’s it.
Introduction:
The Colorfly CDA-M2 DAC marks a significant step forward from its predecessor, the M1, boasting enhanced performance and a slew of new features. Equipped with dual CS 43198 DAC chips, this device delivers a power output of 125mW at 32 ohms for the single-ended output and 250mW at 32 ohms for the balanced output. Capable of decoding up to 32-bit PCM and DSD256.
Let's delve deeper into its design, performance, and overall user experience.
Physical Unit and Specifications:
Crafted from Zinc-Alloy Electroplated Chassis with a small glass section on the face, the CDA-M2 exudes a premium and robust feel. (I felt that the design was inspired from Sony’s WM1A/1Z series DAPs) Despite its sturdy build, the device remains compact and lightweight, making it highly portable. Notably, it features a 100-step volume control at the hardware level, along with a volume memory feature, enhancing convenience and user control.
Setting Options:
The CDA-M2 offers two gain modes and five filter options, providing users with flexibility to customize their listening experience according to their preferences.
The following settings and display options are available:
Volume Display
Format Sampling
Gain Modes
Channel Balance
Source Specifications
Filter Modes
Gaming Mode
S/PDIF Output
Inverted Display
Sound:
All of testing was done on NOS filter and the following IEMs were used for testing:
Supernova (for vocals)
IER-Z1R (for bass response)
Xelento remote 2nd gen (fun factor)
JVC FDX1 (because I wanted to)
Final E5000 (to check power)
Do know that my assessment was done keeping in mind that this is a $160 device.
Tonality:
The Colorfly CDA M2 presents a neutral and transparent tonality, free from coloration or added warmth. Its sound signature leans towards a highly analytical profile, providing an uncolored representation of the audio source. This neutrality contributes to accurate instrument reproduction and a faithful rendering of the original recording.
Bass:
The device offers a controlled and precise bass response, aligning with its neutral tonality. While it may not emphasize the lower frequencies for a warmer or more pronounced bass, the CDA M2 delivers bass that is well-defined and detailed. The lack of artificial enhancement allows the listener to experience the bass frequencies in a manner faithful to the recording.
Vocals:
Vocals on the Colorfly CDA M2 are presented with clarity and accuracy. The neutral tonality ensures that vocals are neither overly forward nor recessed, allowing them to sit naturally within the overall soundstage. The device excels in reproducing vocal nuances, making it suitable for those who prioritize clear and unaltered vocal performance.
Treble:
The treble range on the CDA M2 maintains the device's analytical approach. Treble frequencies are articulate, providing a detailed and extended presentation. While not overly bright or sharp, the treble reproduction on the CDA M2 contributes to the overall clarity and precision of the sound signature. The device excels in handling treble nuances without introducing harshness or sibilance.
*Overall Impression:*
In summary, the Colorfly CDA-M2 DAC impresses with its performance, versatile setting options, and refined sound quality. While it may not cater to everyone's sonic preferences, it excels in delivering a detailed and transparent audio experience.
I would like to thank @gadgetgod and ConceptKart for sending this unit as part of the review tour.
You can purchase it from ConceptKart at the following link (not an affiliate link): https://conceptkart.com/products/colorfly-cda-m2-portable-usb-dac-amp
Also, I’m not a seasoned reviewer or a seasoned audiophile, so whatever I say are purely my observations and your results may vary.
I’m not the one to usually focus on specifications and numbers. I focus more on how happy I am with the equipment’s sound and that’s it.
Introduction:
The Colorfly CDA-M2 DAC marks a significant step forward from its predecessor, the M1, boasting enhanced performance and a slew of new features. Equipped with dual CS 43198 DAC chips, this device delivers a power output of 125mW at 32 ohms for the single-ended output and 250mW at 32 ohms for the balanced output. Capable of decoding up to 32-bit PCM and DSD256.
Let's delve deeper into its design, performance, and overall user experience.
Physical Unit and Specifications:
Crafted from Zinc-Alloy Electroplated Chassis with a small glass section on the face, the CDA-M2 exudes a premium and robust feel. (I felt that the design was inspired from Sony’s WM1A/1Z series DAPs) Despite its sturdy build, the device remains compact and lightweight, making it highly portable. Notably, it features a 100-step volume control at the hardware level, along with a volume memory feature, enhancing convenience and user control.
Setting Options:
The CDA-M2 offers two gain modes and five filter options, providing users with flexibility to customize their listening experience according to their preferences.
The following settings and display options are available:
Volume Display
Format Sampling
Gain Modes
Channel Balance
Source Specifications
Filter Modes
Gaming Mode
S/PDIF Output
Inverted Display
Sound:
All of testing was done on NOS filter and the following IEMs were used for testing:
Supernova (for vocals)
IER-Z1R (for bass response)
Xelento remote 2nd gen (fun factor)
JVC FDX1 (because I wanted to)
Final E5000 (to check power)
Do know that my assessment was done keeping in mind that this is a $160 device.
Tonality:
The Colorfly CDA M2 presents a neutral and transparent tonality, free from coloration or added warmth. Its sound signature leans towards a highly analytical profile, providing an uncolored representation of the audio source. This neutrality contributes to accurate instrument reproduction and a faithful rendering of the original recording.
Bass:
The device offers a controlled and precise bass response, aligning with its neutral tonality. While it may not emphasize the lower frequencies for a warmer or more pronounced bass, the CDA M2 delivers bass that is well-defined and detailed. The lack of artificial enhancement allows the listener to experience the bass frequencies in a manner faithful to the recording.
Vocals:
Vocals on the Colorfly CDA M2 are presented with clarity and accuracy. The neutral tonality ensures that vocals are neither overly forward nor recessed, allowing them to sit naturally within the overall soundstage. The device excels in reproducing vocal nuances, making it suitable for those who prioritize clear and unaltered vocal performance.
Treble:
The treble range on the CDA M2 maintains the device's analytical approach. Treble frequencies are articulate, providing a detailed and extended presentation. While not overly bright or sharp, the treble reproduction on the CDA M2 contributes to the overall clarity and precision of the sound signature. The device excels in handling treble nuances without introducing harshness or sibilance.
*Overall Impression:*
In summary, the Colorfly CDA-M2 DAC impresses with its performance, versatile setting options, and refined sound quality. While it may not cater to everyone's sonic preferences, it excels in delivering a detailed and transparent audio experience.
I would like to thank @gadgetgod for sending this unit as part of the review tour.
Also, I’m not a seasoned reviewer or a seasoned audiophile, so whatever I say are purely my observations and your results may vary.
I’m not the one to usually focus on specifications and numbers. I focus more on how happy I am with the equipment’s sound and that’s it.
Introduction:
The Kinera Celeste Plutus Beast, priced at $89, boasts a tribrid driver setup featuring a bone conduction driver, balanced armature driver, and SPD driver. Its 3D printed resin shell, offers a rounded and comfortable design with customizable hand-painted faceplates available in 2 colors from what I understand.
The soft, tangle-free cable is offered in two versions: 4.4 and 3.5, catering to different preferences.
The case is compact and may be a little too compact as I feel it does not provide any headspace for the IEMs but I definitely liked the pseudo brown leather look. The case definitely adds convenience for travel.
Sound:
Sonically, the Plutus Beast delivers a forward upper mid-range and slightly smooth treble, impacting the naturalness of vocals and instruments. Although the bass energy is somewhat subdued compared to the upper mids, and the treble energy lacks in the upper range, the earphones maintain a neutral signature. However, some people may desire a bit more bass presence.
Despite these nuances, the Plutus Beast impresses with its bass quality and clean mid-range transitions.
While the treble presentation is generally smooth, it could benefit from a touch more energy. The soundstage, though average in width, offers decent depth. Just enough to not feel that the stage is completely closed in.
I felt that the imaging was quite alright but I do have to mention that the placement on instruments in the stage didn’t feel particularly anchored in their positions.
Conclusion:
From a technical standpoint, the Plutus Beast does well within its price range, offering good overall performance. However, its tuning prevents it from claiming the top spot among sub-$100 earphones.
Also, I’m not a seasoned reviewer or a seasoned audiophile, so whatever I say are purely my observations and your results may vary.
I’m not the one to usually focus on specifications and numbers. I focus more on how happy I am with the equipment’s sound and that’s it.
Introduction:
The Kinera Celeste Plutus Beast, priced at $89, boasts a tribrid driver setup featuring a bone conduction driver, balanced armature driver, and SPD driver. Its 3D printed resin shell, offers a rounded and comfortable design with customizable hand-painted faceplates available in 2 colors from what I understand.
The soft, tangle-free cable is offered in two versions: 4.4 and 3.5, catering to different preferences.
The case is compact and may be a little too compact as I feel it does not provide any headspace for the IEMs but I definitely liked the pseudo brown leather look. The case definitely adds convenience for travel.
Sound:
Sonically, the Plutus Beast delivers a forward upper mid-range and slightly smooth treble, impacting the naturalness of vocals and instruments. Although the bass energy is somewhat subdued compared to the upper mids, and the treble energy lacks in the upper range, the earphones maintain a neutral signature. However, some people may desire a bit more bass presence.
Despite these nuances, the Plutus Beast impresses with its bass quality and clean mid-range transitions.
While the treble presentation is generally smooth, it could benefit from a touch more energy. The soundstage, though average in width, offers decent depth. Just enough to not feel that the stage is completely closed in.
I felt that the imaging was quite alright but I do have to mention that the placement on instruments in the stage didn’t feel particularly anchored in their positions.
Conclusion:
From a technical standpoint, the Plutus Beast does well within its price range, offering good overall performance. However, its tuning prevents it from claiming the top spot among sub-$100 earphones.
Few things to note:
Thank you @gadgetgod and Aful for sending this unit my way to audition. I borrowed this unit purely because I was bored and wanted to try something new. I decided to write a review because I felt I should share my impressions / review as I was happy with it’s performance.
Also, I’m not a seasoned reviewer or a seasoned audiophile, so whatever I say are purely my observations and your results may vary.
I’m not the one to usually focus on specifications and numbers. I focus more on how happy I am with the equipment’s sound and that’s it.
Introduction:
The Aful Snowynight Dongle DAC AMP marks Aful's inaugural venture into the world of dongle DAC AMPs, and it's an impressive debut. Priced at $99, this compact device packs a punch with its simple features and promises to deliver high-quality audio performance on the go which I definitely feel it does.
We can always compare a $1 product with a $1000 product to show any short comings which I feel is unfair. I’ve evaluated this unit purely from the perspective of the value it offers at $99 and if you get your money’s worth or more.
Design and Build Quality:
Upon unboxing, the first thing that catches the eye is the Snowynight's elegant design. Crafted from aluminum alloy, it feels sturdy yet lightweight in hand (the shape feels similar to Moonriver that I used in the past) The creative snowflake design adds a touch of whimsy to its otherwise sleek appearance. The inclusion of a choice between a Type-C to Type-C or a Lightning to Type-C cable is a thoughtful addition, catering to a wide range of devices. (I thankfully got a lightning to Type C cable as I use an iPhone).
The quality of the cable was really good. It’s thick, malleable, braided cable and felt sturdy. Something like a ddHiFi MFi07s but can be bent to your satisfaction and feels good to touch.
It has a LED light that changes colour depending on the audio file that you’re playing and a volume up / down buttons on the side.
Features and Specifications:
Equipped with dual CS43198 DAC chips, the Snowynight supports up to 32bit PCM and DSD 256 audio codecs, ensuring compatibility with high-resolution audio files. It offers both single-ended and balanced outputs, catering to different headphone configurations. The device boasts high power output, promising to drive even demanding headphones with ease.
But I wouldn’t recommend that you use power hungry ones. Not that it cannot drive them, but you feel the dynamics lacking a little when you’re used to using your headphones on more powerful portable amps or desktop amps. I tried fairly efficient HPs like Elegia & AudioZenith PMx2 and was happy with the results.
For IEMs, I used, IER-Z1R, Xelento remote (2nd gen) & Penon Quattro, Final E5000, JVC FDX1.
Sound Quality:
The true test of any audio device lies in its sound quality, and the Aful Snowynight doesn't disappoint. I usually find it a little difficult to assess the sound quality of sources and find myself A/Bing more than I would an HP/IEM to come to a conclusion.
I felt SnowyNight had balanced, natural tonality across various IEMs and HPs that I tried. The sound presentation is linear, striking a delicate balance between musicality and clinical accuracy (at this price). The Snowynight maintains good detail levels and dynamic range, producing a captivating listening experience.
The bass quantity was adequate and the attack was decent. Mid-bass was slightly more pronounced compared to sub-bass.
It did however impress me with the vocal presentation. It was not too forward or recessed. It was just right. Vocals did not sound lean at all. They had good note weight.
Treble was smooth and not peaky.
That is all I can say about the sound.
Performance:
In addition to its impressive sound quality, the Snowynight excels in performance metrics as well. It demonstrates power efficiency, ensuring prolonged usage without draining the connected device's battery excessively. The device's ability to maintain a balanced sound signature without adding coloration or tinting is commendable, making it suitable for critical listening sessions.
The amp can output up to 2V 140mW (3.5mm) & 4V 300mW (4.4mm)
A point to note is that it has a high gain mode which I realised few days after testing and you can activate it by pressing the volume up & down buttons simultaneously.
The background was dark and I did not hear any background noise.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the Aful Snowynight Dongle DAC AMP is a standout performer in its price range. With its attractive design, robust build quality, and impressive audio capabilities, it sets a high standard for dongle DAC AMPs in the market. Whether you're a casual listener or an audiophile seeking a source that is fairly powerful and has good sound quality , the Snowynight delivers on all fronts, making it a worthy buy.
Thank you @gadgetgod and Aful for sending this unit my way to audition. I borrowed this unit purely because I was bored and wanted to try something new. I decided to write a review because I felt I should share my impressions / review as I was happy with it’s performance.
Also, I’m not a seasoned reviewer or a seasoned audiophile, so whatever I say are purely my observations and your results may vary.
I’m not the one to usually focus on specifications and numbers. I focus more on how happy I am with the equipment’s sound and that’s it.
Introduction:
The Aful Snowynight Dongle DAC AMP marks Aful's inaugural venture into the world of dongle DAC AMPs, and it's an impressive debut. Priced at $99, this compact device packs a punch with its simple features and promises to deliver high-quality audio performance on the go which I definitely feel it does.
We can always compare a $1 product with a $1000 product to show any short comings which I feel is unfair. I’ve evaluated this unit purely from the perspective of the value it offers at $99 and if you get your money’s worth or more.
Design and Build Quality:
Upon unboxing, the first thing that catches the eye is the Snowynight's elegant design. Crafted from aluminum alloy, it feels sturdy yet lightweight in hand (the shape feels similar to Moonriver that I used in the past) The creative snowflake design adds a touch of whimsy to its otherwise sleek appearance. The inclusion of a choice between a Type-C to Type-C or a Lightning to Type-C cable is a thoughtful addition, catering to a wide range of devices. (I thankfully got a lightning to Type C cable as I use an iPhone).
The quality of the cable was really good. It’s thick, malleable, braided cable and felt sturdy. Something like a ddHiFi MFi07s but can be bent to your satisfaction and feels good to touch.
It has a LED light that changes colour depending on the audio file that you’re playing and a volume up / down buttons on the side.
Features and Specifications:
Equipped with dual CS43198 DAC chips, the Snowynight supports up to 32bit PCM and DSD 256 audio codecs, ensuring compatibility with high-resolution audio files. It offers both single-ended and balanced outputs, catering to different headphone configurations. The device boasts high power output, promising to drive even demanding headphones with ease.
But I wouldn’t recommend that you use power hungry ones. Not that it cannot drive them, but you feel the dynamics lacking a little when you’re used to using your headphones on more powerful portable amps or desktop amps. I tried fairly efficient HPs like Elegia & AudioZenith PMx2 and was happy with the results.
For IEMs, I used, IER-Z1R, Xelento remote (2nd gen) & Penon Quattro, Final E5000, JVC FDX1.
Sound Quality:
The true test of any audio device lies in its sound quality, and the Aful Snowynight doesn't disappoint. I usually find it a little difficult to assess the sound quality of sources and find myself A/Bing more than I would an HP/IEM to come to a conclusion.
I felt SnowyNight had balanced, natural tonality across various IEMs and HPs that I tried. The sound presentation is linear, striking a delicate balance between musicality and clinical accuracy (at this price). The Snowynight maintains good detail levels and dynamic range, producing a captivating listening experience.
The bass quantity was adequate and the attack was decent. Mid-bass was slightly more pronounced compared to sub-bass.
It did however impress me with the vocal presentation. It was not too forward or recessed. It was just right. Vocals did not sound lean at all. They had good note weight.
Treble was smooth and not peaky.
That is all I can say about the sound.
Performance:
In addition to its impressive sound quality, the Snowynight excels in performance metrics as well. It demonstrates power efficiency, ensuring prolonged usage without draining the connected device's battery excessively. The device's ability to maintain a balanced sound signature without adding coloration or tinting is commendable, making it suitable for critical listening sessions.
The amp can output up to 2V 140mW (3.5mm) & 4V 300mW (4.4mm)
A point to note is that it has a high gain mode which I realised few days after testing and you can activate it by pressing the volume up & down buttons simultaneously.
The background was dark and I did not hear any background noise.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the Aful Snowynight Dongle DAC AMP is a standout performer in its price range. With its attractive design, robust build quality, and impressive audio capabilities, it sets a high standard for dongle DAC AMPs in the market. Whether you're a casual listener or an audiophile seeking a source that is fairly powerful and has good sound quality , the Snowynight delivers on all fronts, making it a worthy buy.
I had an opportunity to listen to Aful's previous releases Performer 5 (purchased) and Performer 8 (borrowed from a friend for few days). I was thoroughly impressed with the performance of both of the IEMs. They do truly live up to their name 'performer'. Perhaps, the new entrant into the IEM space, Aful knew that their first releases are going to be bangers and named them accordingly. Performer 8 was definitely an IEM that had everything I need and little extra. I still do think about the detail retrieval prowess of Performer 8 at it's price bracket.
No particular reason why I didn't purchase P8 despite my admiration for it. Just didn't have the time/budget/mindset to add another IEM to the exisiting collection I had. Not that I didn't try.
I did read a few articles here and there that Aful was in the process of developing a single BA IEM and I asked myself,"what's so ground breaking about that?". I thought that their next unnamed at the time single BA IEM was going to be alright and I was midly disappointed that their next IEM was not going to be the one I would want to desperately have in my collection or daily rotation at the least.
Life took over and I forgot all about it until I started seeing posts on the social media about 'Magic One' and I was not excited. I didn't bother to see what it was or what the reviews had to say about it. The hype train started as it usually does frequently in this hobby and I didn't pay much heed to it until folks around started talking about it and insisted that I give it a try. They were all praises about it.
I had an opportunity to audition it as part of the review tour (Thanks to Pulkit and HiFiGo) (You can purchase Magic one at the following link : https://hifigo.com/products/aful-magicone) (I wish this was an affiliate link but it is not) and I said yes because the following weekend was going to be relatively free for me and I thougt I would listen to the 03rd release of Aful.
Some areas of this review might sound like Magic one is not a good IEM but it is when compared to other 01 or even 02 BA IEMs. However, it cannot compete toe to toe in all the areas with DD/multi-BA/hybrid set ups. So it is very important that you look at it from the point of what Aful was trying to achieve from a single BA driver. Magic one tries to do a lot with 01 BA and to a lot of extent it does perform well but it does not compete with multi BA IEMs. But if you compare the Magic one to other 01 BA IEMs, it's huge step up. It does set some precedent to what we can expect with BA designs in future if the remaining manufacturers take notes and put effort. I think Aful just showed that design and implementation counts more than adding multiple drivers.
At the time of writing this Magic one was retailing at $139.99. Would I buy this IEM at this price? No. But is it justified to price it at $139.99? Yes. The cost they're asking I believe is not just for bill of materials but also for the expense in R&D in designing this 01 BA. A normal consumer like me would always go for for what best we can get for as lowest price as possible. Magic one is more of an enthusiast's purchase. Folks who know and appreciate the effort Aful put into making an actually good sounding full range BA driver.
Design, Comfort and quality:
Magic One is absolutely comfortable to wear and it did not bother my ears at all. It does sit slightly flush with my ears. I did however feel a bit of pressure inside my ear due to lack of vents and honestly this bothered me after about 30mins. So I did not use Magic one for more than 40-45mins at a stretch in all of my listening sessions. The cable was really good. Supple to touch and no memory or microphonics and did not tangle. The stock tips are decent and nothing noteworthy. I did however like the snowfall and abstract design on the faceplate.
Let's talk sound :
Leans warm, doesn't steal the show, but nails everything for a single BA. It sounded absolutely musical and enjoyable.
Bass:
The bass was midly adequate and lean but it honestly was not bothersome at all in majority of the tracks that I listened to. I actually was suprised at the quantity and quality of bass (not to sound redundant) for a 01 BA IEM. I expected Magic one to sound tinny but it didn't. It was close full sounding.
Mids :
There was a certain level of thinness in the vocal region but it was not like to listening to the radio in 1990's. Male vocals for the most part had adequate heft (borderline) and the note weight was good.
Female vocals on the other hand definitely sounded better. the peaks were well rounded and sounded richer in my opinion.
Treble :
I'm sensitive to treble and Magic one was an absolute please to listen to. It sounded very natural with no peaks or sibilance and yet it delivered some sense of lightness that I wanted.
Soundstage:
Soundstage was surpisingly (decently) wide and had good sense of depth. It did not sound strictly left and right.
Details:
Decent – strikes a balance between musicality and not drowning in details. Again, I went in to be disappointed and came out with a smile. It had decent detail retrieval and as I was sying before, it sounds absolutely musical with adequate amount of details but nothing too distracting.
Lastly, why does 01 BA driver need so much power? I put the volume of the amp all the way down to about 10% before plugging in Magic One expecting it to blow my ears out at 30-40% and I had to go to 40-50% on medium gain to bring it to decent listening levels.
Magic One vs. other BAs? Holds its own against 01 or 02 BAs but not quite up there with DD/multi-BA/hybrids but it would be an unfair expectation and an insult to the amount of the effort Aful put into developing such a 'Performer' 'Magic One' BA. Still, a solid leap from other 01 BAs. Sets the bar for BAs – design and implementation wise over multiple drivers.
So, in a nutshell, Magic One's a pleasant surprise and at one point, I spent good 10 minutes looking at the shell trying to figure out if there is really only 01 BA driver or if Aful's just pulling a joke on us. I think Aful intentionally kept the shells transparent to show the driver design inside the Magic One. Show off!
No particular reason why I didn't purchase P8 despite my admiration for it. Just didn't have the time/budget/mindset to add another IEM to the exisiting collection I had. Not that I didn't try.
I did read a few articles here and there that Aful was in the process of developing a single BA IEM and I asked myself,"what's so ground breaking about that?". I thought that their next unnamed at the time single BA IEM was going to be alright and I was midly disappointed that their next IEM was not going to be the one I would want to desperately have in my collection or daily rotation at the least.
Life took over and I forgot all about it until I started seeing posts on the social media about 'Magic One' and I was not excited. I didn't bother to see what it was or what the reviews had to say about it. The hype train started as it usually does frequently in this hobby and I didn't pay much heed to it until folks around started talking about it and insisted that I give it a try. They were all praises about it.
I had an opportunity to audition it as part of the review tour (Thanks to Pulkit and HiFiGo) (You can purchase Magic one at the following link : https://hifigo.com/products/aful-magicone) (I wish this was an affiliate link but it is not) and I said yes because the following weekend was going to be relatively free for me and I thougt I would listen to the 03rd release of Aful.
Some areas of this review might sound like Magic one is not a good IEM but it is when compared to other 01 or even 02 BA IEMs. However, it cannot compete toe to toe in all the areas with DD/multi-BA/hybrid set ups. So it is very important that you look at it from the point of what Aful was trying to achieve from a single BA driver. Magic one tries to do a lot with 01 BA and to a lot of extent it does perform well but it does not compete with multi BA IEMs. But if you compare the Magic one to other 01 BA IEMs, it's huge step up. It does set some precedent to what we can expect with BA designs in future if the remaining manufacturers take notes and put effort. I think Aful just showed that design and implementation counts more than adding multiple drivers.
At the time of writing this Magic one was retailing at $139.99. Would I buy this IEM at this price? No. But is it justified to price it at $139.99? Yes. The cost they're asking I believe is not just for bill of materials but also for the expense in R&D in designing this 01 BA. A normal consumer like me would always go for for what best we can get for as lowest price as possible. Magic one is more of an enthusiast's purchase. Folks who know and appreciate the effort Aful put into making an actually good sounding full range BA driver.
Design, Comfort and quality:
Magic One is absolutely comfortable to wear and it did not bother my ears at all. It does sit slightly flush with my ears. I did however feel a bit of pressure inside my ear due to lack of vents and honestly this bothered me after about 30mins. So I did not use Magic one for more than 40-45mins at a stretch in all of my listening sessions. The cable was really good. Supple to touch and no memory or microphonics and did not tangle. The stock tips are decent and nothing noteworthy. I did however like the snowfall and abstract design on the faceplate.
Let's talk sound :
Leans warm, doesn't steal the show, but nails everything for a single BA. It sounded absolutely musical and enjoyable.
Bass:
The bass was midly adequate and lean but it honestly was not bothersome at all in majority of the tracks that I listened to. I actually was suprised at the quantity and quality of bass (not to sound redundant) for a 01 BA IEM. I expected Magic one to sound tinny but it didn't. It was close full sounding.
Mids :
There was a certain level of thinness in the vocal region but it was not like to listening to the radio in 1990's. Male vocals for the most part had adequate heft (borderline) and the note weight was good.
Female vocals on the other hand definitely sounded better. the peaks were well rounded and sounded richer in my opinion.
Treble :
I'm sensitive to treble and Magic one was an absolute please to listen to. It sounded very natural with no peaks or sibilance and yet it delivered some sense of lightness that I wanted.
Soundstage:
Soundstage was surpisingly (decently) wide and had good sense of depth. It did not sound strictly left and right.
Details:
Decent – strikes a balance between musicality and not drowning in details. Again, I went in to be disappointed and came out with a smile. It had decent detail retrieval and as I was sying before, it sounds absolutely musical with adequate amount of details but nothing too distracting.
Lastly, why does 01 BA driver need so much power? I put the volume of the amp all the way down to about 10% before plugging in Magic One expecting it to blow my ears out at 30-40% and I had to go to 40-50% on medium gain to bring it to decent listening levels.
Magic One vs. other BAs? Holds its own against 01 or 02 BAs but not quite up there with DD/multi-BA/hybrids but it would be an unfair expectation and an insult to the amount of the effort Aful put into developing such a 'Performer' 'Magic One' BA. Still, a solid leap from other 01 BAs. Sets the bar for BAs – design and implementation wise over multiple drivers.
So, in a nutshell, Magic One's a pleasant surprise and at one point, I spent good 10 minutes looking at the shell trying to figure out if there is really only 01 BA driver or if Aful's just pulling a joke on us. I think Aful intentionally kept the shells transparent to show the driver design inside the Magic One. Show off!
IEM Relationship Status: It's complicated.
I've been dailying (as if that’s a word) these IEMs, the OG Andromeda, on a daily basis for quite some time now. Trying to reach a definitive conclusion about them hasn't been easy. It's a love-hate dynamic, but the love part seems to be winning.
Those around me who have experienced them either adore them or outright despise them. There's no middle ground, and I can see why.
These are all balanced armature (BA) IEMs, with five on each side, resulting in a distinctive BA tonality. The bass is satisfactory, the mids are brilliant, and let's talk about the treble. I've had some trouble adjusting to it. It's not excessively bright, and the treble is well-executed, but when I listen to metal and rock, it can become fatiguing.
Then I discovered the Asla Sedna Xelastec tips, which made the treble much more enjoyable for me. The same positive effect happened when I tried the Letshouer S12. What's great about these tips is that they don't compromise the mids, and they give a slight boost to the mid-bass region, which I really appreciate.
And then there's the Cayin RU6 with Xelastec tips, which made me fall head over heels for the Andromeda. It provided the warmth I desired without sacrificing the details. With all the other sigma delta-based DACs and the Mojo that I use, I love listening to the Andromeda for a couple of hours, and then I find myself considering switching to my dynamic driver IEMs. However, with the RU6 and Xelastec, it's easy to stay in love with the Andromeda.
Regarding fit and comfort, they are simply the best for me. And that super-light stock cable! I sometimes forget they're even there on my ears.
The soundstage is decent, and the mids feel intimate, just the way I like them. Instrument separation is about a 7 out of 10 (Not that I own or have auditioned many a great IEMs to judge). As for detail retrieval, it's nothing short of fantastic.
These IEMs truly shine when paired with the right source. The source needs to have a dark background because they are highly sensitive. VERY SENSITIVE.
Now, here's where the complicated part of the relationship comes in. The RU6 drains the battery on my phone like a leech. I hesitate to use the RU6 unless I know I'll be near a charger, and that's not always the case when I'm on the go. So, if I want to use the Andromeda, I have to ensure I'm around a charger (it's like a butterfly effect).
This is one of the reasons why I've been eyeing the Hiby RS2 R2R, but unfortunately, I can't justify buying it solely for listening to the Andromeda. If I ever own another IEM like the Andromeda, I'll definitely invest in a battery powered R2R DAC/DAP. (I can already imagine my wife rolling her eyes if she hears this).
Nevertheless, I genuinely like the Andromeda.
On a side note, I also use them to test the noise floor of any equipment I come across. It serves a dual purpose: I get to enjoy music and assess the noise floor at the same time.
I've been dailying (as if that’s a word) these IEMs, the OG Andromeda, on a daily basis for quite some time now. Trying to reach a definitive conclusion about them hasn't been easy. It's a love-hate dynamic, but the love part seems to be winning.
Those around me who have experienced them either adore them or outright despise them. There's no middle ground, and I can see why.
These are all balanced armature (BA) IEMs, with five on each side, resulting in a distinctive BA tonality. The bass is satisfactory, the mids are brilliant, and let's talk about the treble. I've had some trouble adjusting to it. It's not excessively bright, and the treble is well-executed, but when I listen to metal and rock, it can become fatiguing.
Then I discovered the Asla Sedna Xelastec tips, which made the treble much more enjoyable for me. The same positive effect happened when I tried the Letshouer S12. What's great about these tips is that they don't compromise the mids, and they give a slight boost to the mid-bass region, which I really appreciate.
And then there's the Cayin RU6 with Xelastec tips, which made me fall head over heels for the Andromeda. It provided the warmth I desired without sacrificing the details. With all the other sigma delta-based DACs and the Mojo that I use, I love listening to the Andromeda for a couple of hours, and then I find myself considering switching to my dynamic driver IEMs. However, with the RU6 and Xelastec, it's easy to stay in love with the Andromeda.
Regarding fit and comfort, they are simply the best for me. And that super-light stock cable! I sometimes forget they're even there on my ears.
The soundstage is decent, and the mids feel intimate, just the way I like them. Instrument separation is about a 7 out of 10 (Not that I own or have auditioned many a great IEMs to judge). As for detail retrieval, it's nothing short of fantastic.
These IEMs truly shine when paired with the right source. The source needs to have a dark background because they are highly sensitive. VERY SENSITIVE.
Now, here's where the complicated part of the relationship comes in. The RU6 drains the battery on my phone like a leech. I hesitate to use the RU6 unless I know I'll be near a charger, and that's not always the case when I'm on the go. So, if I want to use the Andromeda, I have to ensure I'm around a charger (it's like a butterfly effect).
This is one of the reasons why I've been eyeing the Hiby RS2 R2R, but unfortunately, I can't justify buying it solely for listening to the Andromeda. If I ever own another IEM like the Andromeda, I'll definitely invest in a battery powered R2R DAC/DAP. (I can already imagine my wife rolling her eyes if she hears this).
Nevertheless, I genuinely like the Andromeda.
On a side note, I also use them to test the noise floor of any equipment I come across. It serves a dual purpose: I get to enjoy music and assess the noise floor at the same time.
Attachments
