Reviews by derbigpr

derbigpr

Headphoneus Supremus
Pros: Clarity, resolution, detail, smoothness, deep bass that is in general tight and well controlled, very easy to power, great quality cable, value.
Cons: Slight bass resonance, slighlty "off" tonality in the mids, highs can be sibilant sometimes, too big and bulky, resulting in loose fit.
When I bought these headphones about 2 months ago, I didn't expect much and I bought them without trying them out. It was an impulse buy to be honest, they were on a considerable discount and I just could not resist it.
 
Having no previous experience with Denon headphones (what I know about them came from reading the reviews of the old Dx000 series), and looking at the box design, I expected a bass heavy, V-shaped, "modern sounding" headphones designed for modern music, not really an audiophile grade sound. I'm happy to say I was pleasantly surprised.
 
PACKAGING & ACCESSORIES:
 
The headphones come in a hard cardboard box, the inside lined with black foam and bronze colored silky cloth. Headphones are well protected inside during transport and there's no risk of damage. It comes with a carrying bag that feels sort of small for the D600's, it's the exact same bag that comes with cheap Denon's from the new D series, I would personally never use it, but I guess it's all right.
 
The headphones come with two cables, one short, thin, rubbery and cheap feeling cable with an Apple remote on it that probably nobody will ever use, and the other, long, thick, high quality braided cable. It really is a high quality feeling cable, very soft, doesn't tangle at all and it has nice high quality gold plated jacks on the ends, with the 3.5mm stereo jack made out of aluminium. Probably the nicest cable of any headphone I've owned so far.
 
 
BUILD & COMFORT:
 
These headphones are made mostly out of plastic. Apart from the metal inside the headband and the round aluminium plates on the sides of the earcups with Denon written on it, everything is made out of plastics. It's pretty solid, and might fool you to think it's metal at first since it's strangely cold to the touch and has metalic texture to it, but it's plastic. But because of that they're fairly lightweight relative to their huge size. As far as the actual build quality goes, it's good, they feel solid, there's no rattling, no squeaking, headband adjustment mechanism operates smoothly (even though it's a bit too loose when headband is not stretched apart).
 
Earpads and headband are covered with protein leather which looks and feel real, it's very smooth and soft and has a premium feel to it. Actual pads are made out of memory foam and they're extremelly soft, and the same is true for the headband which never feels like it ran out of padding.
 
The comfort of these headphones is generally good. I say generally because it does have a few issues. Headband is soft, earpads are soft and very big, the earcup is very deep and has plenty of room in all directions even for my huge ears. There is also no problem with wearing glasses while using the headphones since the earpads are so soft.
 
The issue with comfort is actually in the size and fit. The headphones are HUGE, they look ridiculous on the head, and even though they're lighter than you'd think, they're still heavier than most full-size headphones. Also, they don't fit well. They're not uncomfortable to wear, but they don't fit like a glove like some other headphones do...like Beyerdynamics for example.  The clamping force on the D600's is virtually non-existent, combine that with their weight and size, and they don't feel secture on the head, and that is something that I hate. Not being able to move my head freely because headphones will move as well and ruin the seal / change the sound is not good. These are definetly headphones that you put on your head and sit still in a comfy chair while listening to music.
 
I'm not saying these are uncomfortable headphones, but to me, high comfort doesn't just mean soft earpads, but perfect fit and feel. For example, Beyerdynamic T1's feel like a tailored suit, you put them on, and they feel like they're made for your head, they feel incredibly light even though they're actually heavies than D600's (that's because they have a very low profile, close to the head), very comfy and don't feel like a huge piece of hardware on your head, but like a part of you. That is very important for psychoacoustics as well, and ignored by a lot of people. You'll never really get lost in the sound if the headphones constantly remind you they're on your head.
 
 
SOUND:
 
This is the interesting part. As I said, I expected a V-shaped modern sound, but actually got something completely different.
These headphones are fairly neutral sounding. Yes, they do have a somewhat elevated bass, and yes, the highs are slightly above neutral as well, but they're still within the borders of what can be considered neutral. Since I've used them quite a lot in combination with T1's, and they're sort of similar in some ways, I'm going to compare them in some aspects as well.
 
The bass extends really deep, it's flat sounding, there's no bumps or dips in the bass response and it's well textured for a closed back headphones. It's slightly elevated relative to the midrange, but only enough to give it some more life. It never feels like it's overwhelming the rest of the sound, and it's well separated from the mids. However, as with almost any closed back headphones, it does suffer from some minor mid-bass resonance.  If this was a cheap headphone, you would not notice it, since the rest of the sound would not be clean enough to highlight the problem, but when the mids and highs and as clear as on the D600's, this resonance and slight lack of tightness can sometimes be a minor problem, but in general bass is fairly quick and well behaved and most of the time tight and solid.  When playing some really punchy bass at really high volumes, there is some minor distortion to it, but not due to drivers, but due to earcups. It's actually a "boooiiingggg" sound that you can hear after the bass hits, but it's only really present on extreme volumes that nobody is going to listen at.
 
 
Mids are very clean and clear sounding. There's just a sense of purity and resolution in the mids that feels great and give a good "you're there" sensation for closed back headphones. They're very vivid and colorful sounding. These are not headphones that nail the tonality, as they can sound slightly nasal and slightly "wrong" in terms of tonality sometimes (out of the box the problem is much more present than after some running in), but in general, the mids are very, very detailed, well textured and transparent enough for the price of the headphones and their closed type.  They can feel ever so slightly thin sometimes, but you can't have it all.
 
 
Highs are again very slightly elevated, but very clean, fast and sparkly sounding, with none of that metallic tizzy sound, even though they can be very slighlty sibilant with some recordings. Again, not exactly perfectly natural sound in terms of tonality, maybe slightly "enchanced" to make it sound more hi-fi, but it works and the general sense is the same as with the mids. What strikes you first is the amount of clariry and resolution in the sound, and how vivid and engaging the sound is because of it.  Detail is also exceptional. In fact, these are the first headphones that I've bought in the last year that actually made me hear things in recordings that I've never heard before, and among all those headphones are T1's as well. I'm not saying the D600's are more detailed than T1's, but their "enhanced clarity" makes it feel that way and microdetail in music pops out more clearly. When I heard those news pops and crackles in the music with D600's, I switched to T1's and could hear it as well, but I had to really focus on it, while with D600's it would just pop out. It's the same as the case of HD650 vs K701. K701's are not more detailed, but you can hear those details more clearly and focus on them more easily.   The good thing is, D600's manange to do that in a very musical fashion. They do not sound like analytical headphones at all, they are fun and musical, yet their levels of detail and resolution surpasses a lot of headphones that do sound analytical. DT880's come to mind here as well.
 
Soundstage and imaging are impressive for closed back headphones. They don't have the depth or the frontal projection of the sound up the levels of the T1's, but the width and height of the soundstage is comparable, if not superior to the T1's in the sense of creating an atmosphere around you. This is really good in movies and you can tell Denon knows what they're doing when it comes to that, having loads of experience when it comes to home theaters.  Imaging is great for closed back headphones at this price, superior to something like DT880's or K701's and definitely a good few steps ahead of the DT770 80's and M50's , but clearly behind T1's.  When I say clearly I don't mean that D600's are crushed by the T1's, but the imaging is not as good, although it never feels like it's lacking. It's only after I switch to the T1's that I notice a new level of coherence and precision in the placement of various sounds that was not present before. Still, very impressive for closed back headphones at this price.
 
 
Because of the slightly elevated highs and a slightly "off" tonality in the mids though, as well slight resonance in the mid-bass sometimes, they lack the coherence and smoothness of really good open-back headphones. They don't have the coherency and don't put all the elements of music together with as much finesse, and they don't separate the sounds quite as good as equally priced open back headphones. They're not as effortless to listen to.
 
These are still very smooth sounding headphones, there's no audible harshness, but it's still clear that these are not flagship headphones.  Compared to flaghsip headphones such as the T1's that becomes clear after some more focused listening. Even though they're smooth, musical and atmospheric sounding, they're still a step behind the T1's in all those terms. What I'm about to say might make the D600's look bad, but taking them off and putting T1's on feels like a relief on the ears. The sound  of the  T1's flows in such an effortless manner that it's clear they're superior headphones. Again, technically looking, in terms of resolution, clarity and detail, there's not much between the two, they're pretty even with T1's being ever so slightly ahead, but in terms of their presentation, D600's are behind a step. Still, very good compared to other similar headphones and I don't want this unfair comparison with the T1's to ruin your view of the D600's.
 
In general, if I were to describe the sound in a few words, it would be:  clear, pure, very detailed, very high resolution, spacious. These are the things that I notice first and strike the strongest impression when I put them on, and again, in those categories they hold their own against even the T1's.  After some time, slight sibilance in the highs, slight resonance in the bass and sometimes a slight nasal quality of the mids can be noticed in some music when switching between them...but then again, T1's nail the tonality, so almost everything sounds slightly wrong when directly compared to them, so take this with a grain of salt.  When you adjust to the D600's after some time, they sound perfectly natural and believable, and have a good atmosphere and "you're there" feel to them.
 
AMPING:   This is a category that might potentially make these headphones winners. The thing is, these headphones are EXTREMELLY easy to run. Literally, plug them into RCA outputs of your DAC trough a  RCA-->3,5mm  adapter, control the volume digitally from your PC, and they sound as good as they can.  Plug them into an iPhone, and they sound amazing.  In fact, I prefer the sound of them plugged into an iPhone 4S than when they're used with the Musical Fidelity M1DAC and M1HPAP, which is a close to 2000 dollar combo. They sound tigher and more coherent out of an iPhone, less juice that makes them ever so slighlty leaner on the bass might be the reason.
Of course they can play louder out of an amp, but they go plenty loud without an amp, and they do sound a tiny bit more open and full, but nothing even remotely worth paying close to 2000 dollars for...not even 100, that's how small the difference is. They also play equally good out of high output impedance sources such as integrated amplifier headphone outputs. The high output impedance doesn't seem to bother them at all and there are no noticable changes in sound when plugging them into an Onkyo A-5VL amp, which suggests they have a flat impedance/frequency curve.
  This is the thing....that's what makes these headphones cheaper than they actually are, because you're only paying for the headphones, not the headphones and a setup to go with it. As long as you have a smartphone, receiver, integrated amp, a DAC or a decent soundcard, you're at 95% of their potential and not losing out anything major if you don't have a separate headamp.
 
 
All in all, very good headphones. Their biggest flaws are size, loose fit, slight nasal quality to the mids, slight resonance in the mid bass when playing really bass heavy music at really high volumes, and slightly "enchanced" highs that can sometimes increase the amount of sibilance and give some listening fatigue (which is in general low) rather than more detail.
 
One last thing to note is that these are one of the few headphones where I actually noticed a significant change in the sound during running in. First 10 hours are critical.
  • Like
Reactions: trellus
musikaladin
musikaladin
..mine took at least 200hrs to "wake up"... Now they are simply amazing, even if not reaching the smoothness of the D-7100. But as you say, they (as well as the 7100) are extremely easy to drive. A dream out of a iPod touch and the Onkyo hi-res player app...
musikaladin
musikaladin
...and, great review by the way....

derbigpr

Headphoneus Supremus
Pros: A lot of bass, lightweight, very comfortable, cheap, easy to power.
Cons: Very recessed mids and highs relative to the bass, muddy sound, low overall sound quality with very little detail, short cable.
I bought these headphones just for the fun of it, to see how they sound with all that apparently amazing bass.
 
Well, for $50, they're ok sounding for extra bass headphones.  They do have a lot of bass, but its not a high quality detailed bass, its that one-note boomy mess that makes
a boomy muddy messy veil over the rest of the sound frequencies.   Compared to my 6 year old Sennheiser HD212pro, which was a headphone in the same price range back then as the XB500 is today, I'd say the HD212pro is considerably better in about every single way. While it doesn't have quite as much bass, it has about 90% of the bass quantity and higher bass quality, while the rest of the frequencies are much less recessed and much more detailed. 
 
Also, the extension and punch of the bass on the XB500 doesn't seem to be great.  For example, and this is going to sound crazy to some people,  AKG K701 has much better bass extension. Bass on XB500 noticeably rolls off, regardless of amplifier used, and especially when used unamped out of some portable device. If I were to test both headphones at lets say 80 hz, and volume match them, then playing a 30 hz tone on both headphones would reveal that K701 stayed pretty much at the same volume level, while the volume on the XB500 dropped considerably. 
 
Another thing is the punch of the bass. Again, even compared to so called "bass light" headphones such as K701, XB500 has less bass punch. It's just too slow and muddy to have any sharp and fast punchy impact.  Listening to Infected Mushroom albums, its clear the K701 is in a different league when it comes to bass punch, so, for an "extra bass" headphone, XB500 doesn't really do that well.  Well, it has a lot of bass quantity, but in a positive and negative way depending on the recording. Sometimes, the bass is ok, when the only thing in the track you're listening to is bass, and everything else is pushed back.  If you listen to a bassy track that has a lot of other sounds going on in the mids and highs, its going to be a muddy mess.
 
Going from HD212 to XB500 on certain more congested track feels like you've added some pillows between the drivers and your ears that block all the sound except the bass, and still, there's not that much more bass on the XB500.
 
All in all, it gets a good mark for portability, lightness, comfort and a lot of bass, which is good if that's what you're looking for.
If you want a bassy headphone that does all genres well, look elsewhere.  I mean, the clarity and detail of the mids and highs in the XB500 is on a level of earbuds that I got with my Samsung Galaxy phone.

derbigpr

Headphoneus Supremus
Pros: Small size, relatively portable, enough power for most low-mid end headphones, versatile
Cons: Can be harsh, funny volume pot
Awesome, buy it now.
 
Tested with K701, DT990 Pro, DT880 600, HD650 and HFi-2400's.

derbigpr

Headphoneus Supremus
Pros: FUN, great value, very powerful bass, good mids and highs, comfortable, light, sturdy, great isolation, removable cable, MUCH better than XB500
Cons: Bass sometimes tends to slightly overpower mids and highs in some songs, which can be good or bad depending on genre, looks cheap, thin cables.
These are my favorite headphones. I've had them for years, I don't even remember when I bought them, but still to this day, every time I put them on, they put a big smile on my face.
 
I own headphones such as Sennheiser HD650 and AKG Q701, and have owned many others much more expensive than HD212's, but none of them were as fun.
 
HD212pro are in my opinion one of those headphones which make you forget about sound neutrality, or soundstage, or imaging, etc...they just make you have fun.  Any music, from techno, dubstep, rock to classical and jazz sounds great for the money, and that constant smooth bass envelops you. No other cans that I have tried can produce as much bass as these. I mean, HD650's bass feels thin after listening to these for a while.
 
Overall, great set of cans for the money.
 
EDIT(May,2013) - after about 6 years of ownership, these headphones are physically in a bad condition. Earpads have started flaking, the foam has lost some of its firmness (but still far more durable than earpads on HD650's), the silver paint is on some areas now just black plastic, etc.  But sound....sound is better than ever before.  I've recently bought a Sony XB500 because I found them on a good discount, hoping it will be an upgrade over the HD212 as a basshead can. Well, its not. To put it nicely, XB500 sounds like crap next to the HD212pro. Yes, it has a bit more bass quantity, but nowhere near the quality. As for mids and highs...there is no comparison, HD212 outclass them. They sound like headphone that easily could cost twice or even three times as much. I'm honestly a believer than HD212pro's even at a price of 120 dollars would not be anything other than a excellent headphone.  The amount of bass punch they manage to produce, and the way the bass is separated from the rest of the sound, makes them quite unique. I'm yet to hear a headphones that does it as well. Not even the DT770 Pro 80's manage to achieve such sound separation. Even though they are slightly superior in sound quality overall, they definitely don't outclass or humiliate the HD212pro's. These are simply stunning little headphones with a big sound. They NEVER EVER disappoint, but they need a amping. Yes, even though you can plug them into a phone and they'll get loud enough, using them with a proper source and amp makes a big differences. It transforms them from muddy bass heavy sound to a crisp, punchy, hard hitting sound.  The voicing is also very good. They sound realistic, more than some much more expensive headphones. I'd go as far to say the voices when listening to podcasts or radio sound more real than on the HD650's. Not as clear of course, but its a "right" tonality. Its no wonder since they're basically flat (+- 3db) from 50 to 2000 Hz with a gentle roll of on both ends.  Certainly "pro" headphones, even if they can produce loads of bass.
 
Overall, again, great cans. They're just so reliable and always make me smile. Its one of those headphones that after some time you forget about, because you've perhaps bought new headphones and you're using them, and you might throw these in a box and put them in a basement, or in some storage room, and after like a year or two while browsing for something, you find them, plug them in, and get absolutely amazing by how good they sound, and then end up using them for like a month straight without ever looking at your 400-500 dollar cans.
orri
orri
So you think this is the case with all open headphones since they leak sound? (I wouldn't know since I've never owned open back headphones but am currently thinking of getting a pair as an alternative to my D2000's).
derbigpr
derbigpr
I don't know, but from my experience, no open headphone has as much punch as closed. For example, my HD650's are very bassy and full sounding, but compared to HD212 they are almost thin and lack punch. Also, they have very low bass at low volumes, you only get great bass once you use very high volume. With HD212 you get great bass at any volume.
Wyd4
Wyd4
What can I say, these are the headphones that started it all for me.
I only upgraded mine last year and I had them since I moved out of home so near on 10 years.
These headphones were used at LAN's, smashed around my PC, ripped off my head when walking away from my PC drunk and still they kept on.
In this time I have had 2 cable replacements but other than that they were stellar.
I only replaced them because I believe either the wiring in one of the cups had come loose or the driver had finally given up the ghost and I figured it wasnt worth spending the money fixing.
I still have them sitting on my desk at hope almost as though like a memorial.  I cant throw them!

derbigpr

Headphoneus Supremus
Pros: Comfort, sound quality (especially mids), soundstage, very energetic and pleasant, they will work wihout amp, build quality.
Cons: Need an amp to really shine, bass could be more powerful and more controlled, sound leak, they can get warm on ears.
Read complete review and impressions here:
 
http://www.head-fi.org/t/540173/sennheiser-hd558-impressions-review
Back
Top