Gintaras
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2013
- Posts
- 2,778
- Likes
- 122
Music, thanks, obrigado
Of all these iem's you guys are talking about, I have a simple question. Which one has the sound sig mostly resembling the EX1000's? I am preparing for a backup to my EX1000 as it has been sadly discontinued for production.
Out of those I've heard (all except for the Parterres): sadly none.
Btw, did you know there are some new Sony IEMs on the horizon...
Bottom line, I think these may well be some of the best complementary IEMs to the 1plus2 out there, despite their low price tag. They're definitely the best choice out of my current IEM collection, considering your listening preferences. If you ask me, I'd say it might be worth to challenge your stance on Sony products and give them a try sometime.
Cos I only have the 1Plus2 Über, MH335DW, TG!334, & SE846.Off-topic: In the gym just out of a DAP? No issues with sweating. Surely, if you don't focus on sonics there would be less of a reason to bring the FitEars to the gym. Is it due to comfort? Although I was prepared to use the older 1Plus2s around the gym....and I used the SE-535s a couple of times in such a situation.
On topic: Unfortunately, the 1Plus2 right cable has popped out of the IEM twice now since I've owned the new pair from fiddling around with the ear seal when I get to work. Not even going to attempt removing it from its 'office desk' environment. Although I haven't had an issue for over a week now..
Cos I only have the 1Plus2 Über, MH335DW, TG!334, & SE846.
So I gym with either FitEars.
I believe the that the ergonomic design of these IEMs could improve in the stem lip holding the tips, & in the recessed socket design. Preferably for my ears I think the angle of the stem could be changed a little to allow it to be more flush to the ears.
Cos I only have the 1Plus2 Über, MH335DW, TG!334, & SE846.
Out of those I've heard (all except for the Parterres): sadly none.
Btw, did you know there are some new Sony IEMs on the horizon...
James, interesting test, i am curious to listen to this Sony when you willing to lend me them for a week and o have enough time to do good audition.
what i wonder do Sonys convey all close subtleys like timeliness, pace, acoustic depth, etc.... you know it is so difficult to strike this delicate balance and as to date i heard 1p2 excelled best way in this. yesterday i again listened to the big organ in Mariazell church and again thought of my gear, none would be able to fill the room in that way to recreate full presence ... okokok i know pipe organ has the most compex polyphonic among all music instruments but i measure the ability of gear to come at least some way in this direction. so lets subject Sonys to proper organ music and then do my usual torture tests using Rwak, T1 amp and Uber interconnect.
@Mimouille, yes indeed poor AnakChan :-D
but never forget one Über cable counts for two IEMs
James, interesting test, i am curious to listen to this Sony when you willing to lend me them for a week and o have enough time to do good audition.
what i wonder do Sonys convey all close subtleys like timeliness, pace, acoustic depth, etc.... you know it is so difficult to strike this delicate balance and as to date i heard 1p2 excelled best way in this. yesterday i again listened to the big organ in Mariazell church and again thought of my gear, none would be able to fill the room in that way to recreate full presence ... okokok i know pipe organ has the most compex polyphonic among all music instruments but i measure the ability of gear to come at least some way in this direction. so lets subject Sonys to proper organ music and then do my usual torture tests using Rwak, T1 amp and Uber interconnect.
If you are referring in part to the depth of the sound staging there really isn't a whole lot on the EX1000. It's focus is really on width. It was a more narrow presentation in my case.
Lee, frankly speaking i know it that no gear will be able to reproduce church organ because besides complex polyphony also has incredible acoustic in church. Also, unlike with live venues where much depends on hall acoustics, churches in most cases have darn good acoustic. And i have better chance to visit church often than concerts, so i am able to keep better sense of live organ play and compare this to gear sound.
Depth is not only about instrument layering but also complex polypony i am able to hear in the notes, same note can have many small tonalities.
That proper mic techniques should record. Reproduction vs live is an issue on all music.
Sound staging is probably the hardest part to agree upon, as people tend to perceive spatial presentation widely differently. Still, I maintain that the EX1000 and MDR-7550 sound closest to full-sized headphones out of all IEMs I've heard, not only in spatiality, but also in how effortlessly they scale with higher volume.
Mids play a key role in depth perception. The 1plus2 has a little trick up its sleeve, in that the slight V-shape tuning results in perceived (vocal) distance and forward projection. In my understanding any "complementary" pair of IEMs to the 1plus2 should have more mids presence and hence less perceived distance and forward projection. The 7550 meet these requirements, while retaining a nice sense of space.
James
A complementary pair of IEMs to the 1plus2 should probably convey some more mid presence, if a more normalized IEM sound is required. I am generalizing somewhat here.
However, I think we can mostly agree that the majority of music is recorded primarily for speakers. From this perspective, we need to gather thoughts as to which presentation is correct, not personal preference. A high end speaker system's sound staging starts at the plane of the speakers and soundstages behind the speakers. This presentation is not V shaped, as such but just revealing how the recording was produced........................