You misunderstand me. OK, I mis-communicated myself.
If someone has a known stance on an issue, that will be reflected in their comments, obviously. If that stance is not known, their opinions will be judged in a different light.
I'm just saying that I like to know where someone is coming from.
If they are constantly pushing one point of view with hard-headed aggression and refuse to engage in a serious debate, then it is useful for me to know that. That is the information I was trying to convey for the benefit of others.
In my opinion, argumentum ad hominem only comes into play if we are having a valid, logical debate, which, clearly is not possible with the people in question. Which is my real point.
Quote:
Originally Posted by fwojciec /img/forum/go_quote.gif
And please don't say that calling people names is a valid form of arguing about claims, because it isn't - it is a logical fallacy.
|
It may have been interpreted as that, due to my poor articulation, but that is not what I was implying.
My comments were not related to the arguing of claims, but the establishment of character.