Author:Bad_Robot Moderator at hifi-forum
So, I've heard all the late afternoon and evening compared, measured, and tested.
Here the AK120 times next to its predecessor, the AK100, and the iBasso DX100:
The AK120 was somewhat larger than the AK100, but is still less than the DX100.
Here is the display of the AK120 compared to the DX100:
I have examined the AK120 for its suitability for InEars. (Like other clip-on headphones to try, that is not my core competency.) Tested and I have heard today with the Sennheiser IE800 (dynamic driver), UE 10 and Triple.Fi JHAudio JH-13Pro (both multi-BA-InEars).
To pre-empt the outcome: sound can not scratch the AK120 on the throne of the iBasso DX100 IMHO. The AK120 is indeed much better than its predecessor, the AK100 (and not only in terms of output impedance), but he does not reach the DX100.
Here the AK120 RMAA measurements of a UE 10 are Triple.Fi even think about it.
http://www.markuskraus.com/RMAA/ak120tf10.htm
Both the frequency response as well as the other measured values are slightly better than - for example - an iPhone 5 with UE 10 Triple.Fi it. The iPhone 5 was measured somewhere once with 3.27 ohms, so the specification of 3 ohms when AK120 seems to be true already.
http://www.markuskraus.com/RMAA/iphone5.htm
The values of AK120 are quite good, but whether it is worth the price of one, everyone must decide for themselves.
Next, the Sennheiser IE800 turn came. I was thinking at first that the AK120 with these InEars (with dynamic range driver) can cope better, but as it turned out, not really:
AK120 with Sennheiser IE800.
http://www.markuskraus.com/RMAA/ak120ie800.htm
Although the true frequency response (which was expected), but strangely, bagged the channel separation of the AK120 with the IE800 off in the basement.
I first thought of a measurement error or poor contact with the cable. Therefore, I have time to umgeswitcht iBasso DX100 and those measured with the IE800:
iBasso DX100 Sennheiser IE800.
http://www.markuskraus.com/RMAA/dx100ie800.htm
As you can see, all right. Then put back the AK120, measured again, and again the same result (channel separation sags).
Well, a measuring technique "worse" channel separation is often even subjectively perceived as "nice" as worse values in the separation channel, the acoustic stage slightly increase. The stage presentation is certainly quite a bit different between AK120 and DX100 (whether "better" or "worse" is a matter of personal taste). It seems to me the direct comparison before and as if the AK120 plays a bit of "crystal clear". This is (either my imagination or) may on the other DAC or other digital filters. DX100 first I was really written that he was a bit "soft flushed" to me sounds like. I could fix this, as I had changed the DX100. Somewhere in the menus, you can change the digital filter of "slow roll-off" to "fast / sharp roll-off". This has the "problem" that I fixed with the DX100 for me.
Well, the AK120 is such that he probably still a "faster" setting runs. The difference DX100 from "slow" to "fast" is about as how the difference of DX100 (the "sharp") for AK120. (The AK120 plays virtually in "super sharp".)
Whichever is better, like everything else, however, is also a matter of personal taste.
The AK120 makes quite a few things but not different, but better than the DX100. What I noticed is this:
- Smaller housing
- Does not require a separate charger as the DX100. The AK120 is charged via the USB cable.
- Longer battery life (7 hours vs 16 hours in the DX100 AK120).
- I also like the UI of the AK120 better. Although it's kind of minimalist, but "more responsive". It seems to react faster. The DX100 always carry a complete halt in the background Android 'around with it. Who knows what's going on, always in the background. DX100 somehow it always takes a bite until he responds to display oppressors. The AK120 is there faster.
Measurement techniques can be considered the AK120 but only heave on the DX100 level if you connect an external pKHV very good. In my case it was an RSA Hornet (something in the caliber then IMHO it should be already). The metrological looks like this:
AK120 -> RSA Hornet -> UE Triple.Fi 10
So, that's it for today.
Best regards,
Markus
PS: The iBasso DX100 UE Triple.Fi 10 off can be found here.