bergman2
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2007
- Posts
- 701
- Likes
- 10
Quote:
no, no, no...you misunderstand...indeed, that would be over the line...nothing so obvious as an overt threat but political connections and subtle power plays are of course part of the extra-legal legal process....as for an injunction, tro, etc., these are granted reluctantly and on a temp basis with a specific fact pattern that doesn't appear to be operative in this case....in order to successfully get such an equitable remedy, you need a high probability of success in legal outcome, defintive harm resulting from continued activity sought to be prevented, secreting funds...
Originally Posted by Uncle Erik /img/forum/go_quote.gif They get away with that? Maybe it's different elsewhere, but threateningc riminal prosecution to gain an advantage in civil litigation is a line not to be crossed. I don't know the exact mechanism in Mikhail's jurisdiction, but there ought to be a method of filing an ex parte motion shortly after filing suit to get an injunction against Mikhail to stop him from selling, transferring or otherwise disposing of assets. Which is why you need an aggressive creditor's attorney there - he or she will know how to handle these things and really put the hammer down on him. |
no, no, no...you misunderstand...indeed, that would be over the line...nothing so obvious as an overt threat but political connections and subtle power plays are of course part of the extra-legal legal process....as for an injunction, tro, etc., these are granted reluctantly and on a temp basis with a specific fact pattern that doesn't appear to be operative in this case....in order to successfully get such an equitable remedy, you need a high probability of success in legal outcome, defintive harm resulting from continued activity sought to be prevented, secreting funds...