bangraman
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2002
- Posts
- 10,305
- Likes
- 65
It's always the way. I bought the HD600 thinking they were going to be the best, then lots of other phones sort of turned up
Originally posted by pbirkett I dunno... I am just so confused |
Originally posted by Tyson I started w/600's 2 years ago, went through a slew of other cans, and am now back to really appreciating and preferring the 600's presentation and strengths. Just my $.10 |
Originally posted by wallijonn But $225 not-poorer? |
Originally posted by Tyson ....I think a lot of people start w/HD600's that are not "ready" to appreciate their sound, and they quickly get seduced by other more exciting sounding cans. I started w/600's 2 years ago, went through a slew of other cans, and am now back to really appreciating and preferring the 600's presentation and strengths.... |
Originally posted by pbirkett I listen to mostly techno and trance, and I find these more than acceptable to be honest..... |
Originally posted by pbirkett But what I am sure about is that I feel the 580's / 600's are coming under a fair amount of unfair flak lately. They sound exciting when they need to be, but not when they dont (maybe this is the forwardness of my amp). |
Originally posted by sacd lover I hear the veil as a suckout in the tonal balance that makes the sound to distant and removed. |
Originally posted by Canman Any newbie who reads these boards probably thinks Sennheisers are crap from the way you guys talk about them. I think y'all underrate the HD580 and HD600. They are fine sounding cans. I could easily live with either as my only set. They aren't the best cans for everyone (yes stereophile definitely stretched the best dynamic can award) but they have a lot to offer. |