[DanBa]

Latest version of USB Audio Player PRO (UAPP): 1.0.7
 

 

[NZtechfreak]

Grabbed that update earlier today, maintenance type update, hoping for Notification controls next!

 

[Ra97oR]

Hopeing for source selection in the near future instead of picking everything.

 

[DanBa]

iBasso D Zero-SE USB DAC/amp & Android-based USB audio:
http://www.hibino-intersound.co.jp/information/3462.html
http://www.phileweb.com/review/article/201311/25/990_3.html
 
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 >> USB OTG cable >> iBasso D Zero-SE >> headphones
 

 
 
LG G2 >> USB OTG cable >> iBasso D Zero-SE >> headphones
 

 
 
Luxman DA-06 DAC & Android-based USB audio:
http://www.onahighernote.com/luxman/?c=&id=65
http://www.phileweb.com/review/article/201311/25/990_5.html
 
high resolution audio files > USB Audio Recorder PRO running on Samsung Galaxy Note 3 >> USB OTG cable >> Luxman DA-06 DAC >> amp >> speakers or headphones
 

 
 
high resolution audio files > USB Audio Recorder PRO running on LG G2 >> USB OTG cable >> Luxman DA-06 DAC >> amp >> speakers or headphones
 

 
 
high resolution audio files > USB Audio Recorder PRO running on Google Nexus 7 >> USB OTG cable >> Luxman DA-06 DAC >> amp >> speakers or headphones
 

 
 
There is a sound quality comparison of "Android device & USB Audio Recorder PRO music player" and "Mac & Audirvana music player".
http://www.phileweb.com/review/article/201311/25/990_5.html
http://www.amr-audio.co.uk/html/dp777_tech-papers_OSX-Integermode.html
http://www.6moons.com/audioreviews/players/1.html

 

[walkman_heart]

tested the sony experia z of my friend last night and it's working with hrt microstreamer without the need of UAPP app

however it only supports 16/44 flac files

Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk

 

[NZtechfreak]

tested the sony experia z of my friend last night and it's working with hrt microstreamer without the need of UAPP app

however it only supports 16/44 flac files

Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk

You'll need UAPP for higher than 16-bit rates.

 

[StanD]

You'll need UAPP for higher than 16-bit rates.

16 bit is a resolution not a rate.

 

[Theogenes]

  16 bit is a resolution not a rate.

 
I think he was using a shorthand for "rates that accompany 16-bit resolution." Which seemed clear from context, but someone else may have the same question, I suppose. 

 

[StanD]

   
I think he was using a shorthand for "rates that accompany 16-bit resolution." Which seemed clear from context, but someone else may have the same question, I suppose. 

Stating 16 bit would have not required any implications and would be accurate. Or simply state, "16 bit associated rates."
Edit: Perhaps I take things too literally, however, some others may erroneously take it for fact.

 

[Theogenes]

Stating 16 bit would have not required any implications and would be accurate. Or simply state, "16 bit associated rates."
Edit: Perhaps I take things too literally, however, some others may erroneously take it for fact.

Gotcha. No worries.

 

[DanBa]

Aune T1 24bit Tube USB DAC/headphone amp & USB audio:
http://www.hifidiy.net/24-31-1.html
http://forum.hardware.fr/hfr/gsmgpspda/telephone-android/unique-samsung-galaxy-sujet_25849_200.htm#t1635990
 
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 >> USB OTG cable >> Aune T1
 
 

 

[dc-k]

  Aune T1 24bit Tube USB DAC/headphone amp & USB audio:
http://www.hifidiy.net/24-31-1.html
http://forum.hardware.fr/hfr/gsmgpspda/telephone-android/unique-samsung-galaxy-sujet_25849_200.htm#t1635990
 
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 >> USB OTG cable >> Aune T1
 
 

Nice...

 

[NZtechfreak]

Thanks for the clarification, I think what I intended was quite clear from context but agree communications of technicalities should be precise enough not to require context to necessarily ensure their correct interpretation. In my defence I will point out that I was replying from my phone, and additionally experiencing next-level sleep deprivation on account of month old twins.

 

[Theogenes]

Thanks for the clarification, I think what I intended was quite clear from context but agree communications of technicalities should be precise enough not to require context to necessarily ensure their correct interpretation. In my defence I will point out that I was replying from my phone, and additionally experiencing next-level sleep deprivation on account of month old twins.

 
Saul Goodman

 

[StanD]

Thanks for the clarification, I think what I intended was quite clear from context but agree communications of technicalities should be precise enough not to require context to necessarily ensure their correct interpretation. In my defence I will point out that I was replying from my phone, and additionally experiencing next-level sleep deprivation on account of month old twins.

Not to worry. Congratulations on the twins. Once they become teenagers..........