shikada san in the email where he mentioned the desktop version especially asked why battery powered in my idea, this is what i wrote as answer to shikada san:
----------
One of the best abilities of the tu-05 is the ability to provide lots of power for short, hard hitting bass pulses.
If you listen to telarc, erich kunzel, tschaikowskj 1812, ouverture, the tu-05 is the only headphone amp i own to play this with nearly no distortion.
I have a long term experience both in listening to amplifiers and headphones, but also in electronic measurement systems and power supply optimization.
I am pretty sure that you can greatly improve the desktop version bringing it to a new, next level by
- double mono design, absolutely separated channels (okay, one volume knob), each mono block with at least the battery capacity the tu-05 has now
- bigger capacitors (per channel)
- more space, clearer separation between df91 stage and dl92 stage
- charge on/off switch with relais (driven by the chargers power) or just a switch to operate the amp in pure battery mode
- external power supply, removable, connected with jack, NOT integrated into the amp, but better quality than now, you should design your own power supply as extra stage to provide even more current!
If you want to optimize the power path, it is very important to have really thick ground lines and power cables, to provide really the same ground on all points independent of current flow.
If i were you, i would use for example the above mentioned 1812 ouverture, if the power part and amp can play this without any distortion or dynamic compression, then you are in audio heaven.
Benefits:
Battery operation - no hum, great bass and impulse capabilities, no noise, stable and homogenous sound and soundstage
Mono design, more distance between amplification stages - - better channel separation, improved soundstage width and depth
Minimized crosstalk, especially for current hungry impulses
--------------
p.s. 2x 30 mW output for two hornspeakers ? will that work?