jason2087
New Head-Fier
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2010
- Posts
- 34
- Likes
- 18
Bassinmyface I live near you and have W4/ UM3X / HF5 and SM3 v2 I will let you try any of them if you let me try the FX700.
I figure this is a good thread to ask, have any of you tried the Atrio M5 with MG7 drivers compared to the JVC FXT90?
In my case, it looks like my ears don't seem to know how to cope with several armatures delivering parts of the full spectrum (crossover or not).
Dynamic driver IEMs sound more natural (to me, I insist), whereas anything beyond one armature sounds like stripes of sound badly patched together.
I could only keep my TripleFis 10 for a month, I was only hearing a mess, especially in the mids, although they are recognized as very good IEMs.
But again, these are just my ears, I'm sure multi-BA IEMs sound nice to other people, otherwise they would not sell so well.
I have owned the MG7 in the past and have another pair coming and also own the FXT90. The FXT90 is brighter and clearer over all with greater treble presence and a mid centric sound. The MG7 has laid back treble, slightly dry mids that, to me, are not forward or recessed and of course it has stellar sub bass. I think the FXT90 is technically better and more musical but it fits my preferences better. Someone else may disagree.
This I agree with. My preference so far is that I prefer dynamic, then single BA then multiple BA. I returned the TF10 the same day I got it.
There aren't any universal dynamic IEMs that are considered better than those two, correct? They are the top-of-the-top I believe?
Hate the high end sound of almost every dynamic I've ever heard, but feel like BAs are missing that genuine thump of low end.
Interesting that you say single BA over multi, have you heard any BA with dual low drivers?