jgray91
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Mar 12, 2011
- Posts
- 10,288
- Likes
- 331
http://www.head-fi.org/t/620339/upcoming-fiio-flagship-portable-amp-mont-blanc-e12-updated-on-11-9-2012/375#post_8940534
in case he edits his post:
I am certain you are all audio enthusiasts, trying to manufacture a product but lack the professional R&D approach, to put it bluntly you are amateurs when it comes to production R&D. Being enthusiastic does not necessarily mean you are professionally capable. Professionals would NOT request/require consumer feed-back for development, have you ever seen Samsung or Apple enter Forums to ask for opinions ? It is a case of "too many cooks spoils the broth" you have lost sight of the original concept of portability and ended up designing an Amp for indoor usage with full sized headphones.
This is because you design a product for a category but fail to keep the criteria bound to that category which is PORTABILITY as stated in the title of this OP. You are also wrong when you say the JDS Labs C421 and the ALO portable Amps are of the same size, they are NOT, C421 and ALO Rx MK3, ALO Rx MkII, etc etc are 10cm +/- in length but the E12 is 124cm long and it is this extra 2cm which makes it not fully congruous with mobile-phone usage because it will block the back camera. Your suggestion of attaching the E12 to the screen of the iPhone (how to access the UI ?) or sliding the Amp up/down (risking scratches on a £699 device ?) definitely show signs of thoughtless input , same as your R&D.
If the OP title states *Upcoming FiiO " Flagship " amp Mont Blanc/E12*, I would say you have been very successful and if true to the specifications then you have a very good product.
Something which is NOT portable for a portable Amp then you have failed because you design the device to the users wishes rather than adherent to the original criteria of portability.
I also understand the reason for defending a product when it is far too late to pull from production to meet ETA. The more vehement the defence, the more truth in the ridicule.
You can self congratulate, self praise however much, the device is still too long to be congruous with mobile phones (I repeat yet again).
Well, if what you guys are doing in that thread is pressing FiiO to implement this feature or that feature, than you should know that's what made the FiiO X3 originally fail, among other reasons. But the he only thinks of using only just with the iPhone, which is pretty ignorant of him. There are a lot of other phones that's bigger than the Mont Blanc. All the other amps listed is mainly aimed for iPhone size first and foremost, so that's why they are shaped that way. I'm sure that FiiO would want to target them too, but considering that FiiO is more than just catering to Apple products, it makes sense to not be exactly the size of the iPhone. Besides the iPhone 5 is the same length as the Mont Blanc.
And if he looks back at all the for-iPhone portable amps, all of them cover the back camera so it's a non-issue since a long time. Same goes with the Picoslim, the Fostex HP-P1, the new Sony DAC/amp, etc. The only for-iPhone amp that I can think of that is designed to allow usage of the camera is the VModa VAMP and the Go-DAP, which is what VModa outsourced from. So no, his argument regarding using the camera with any amp attached is invalid.
And when you consider stuff like the HP-P1, the new Sony DAC/amp, the CLAS, etc, they are way bigger and bulkier than the Mont Blanc. He's just butthurt for the sake of being butthurt.
I would guess next that he would say those are way out of the price range of the Mont Blanc and it doesn't count. Just put him in the ignore list to ignore his ignorance.