TT was clearly designed with a more powerful power supply and to help with "transients" it uses super capacitors. You can see the difference comparing Hugo and TT here:
http://reference-audio-analyzer.pro/en/report/amp/chord-hugo.php Code:
Code:
Ohm mW 16 15,87 25 20,51 31 41,48 62 80,84 100 127,18 199 101,49 300 67,28 763 26,48
and here:
http://reference-audio-analyzer.pro/en/report/amp/chord-hugo-tt.php Code:
Code:
Ohm mW 16 255,93 25 331,61 31 336,26 62 207,98 100 130,00 199 65,46 300 43,43 763 17,08
TT has more than twice the power of Hugo, 337mW versus 127mW.
Notice that power at 300 Ohms (HD 800 S has minimum impedance of 334 Ohms according to the same site) is lower with TT. That's because it has a lower maximum voltage of 3.61V root mean square, compared with 4.5V RMS for Hugo. At 300 ohm for HD 800 S, Hugo has 2dB more sound pressure level (119dB versus 117dB), which is a difference you could detect (through the pain? pain versus slightly more pain?).
These numbers suggest that Hugo drives HD 800 S better than TT, if you talk about loudness only. The T'HD graphs on those pages (look for the section called "THD vs load vs output voltage") also indicate that Hugo is better at 300 Ohms (very small difference). Unfortunately these tests don't show what happens with transients, which are the type of sound that requires "power" during normal listening.
I have seen one person (on another forum) prefer Hugo over TT. Everyone else prefers TT, sometimes to the extent that they wouldn't buy Hugo, but would buy TT. So, overall, it seems the numbers don't tell you much that's meaningful. TT will drive 31 Ohm headphones better than Hugo, having 8 times more power, which in theory means TT will sound almost twice as loud. But that's about the limit of what these numbers tell us.
Having compared DAVE and TT, I discovered (not straight away, it was after a couple of hours) that TT has more distortion, phat bass, driving HD 800 S. Even after hearing this difference, it wasn't the dominant reason for preferring DAVE. That was playing quite loudly and turning the volume down a bit on TT made the distortion go away. No matter how loudly I played DAVE I couldn't hear this distortion appearing.
DAVE isn't massively more powerful than TT, as opposed to GSX Mk 2. One might say that DAVE doesn't have enough extra power, if we want to ask "do we need the power of GSX Mk 2?" So my comparison isn't that useful. But it did show me that TT is more distorted than DAVE, when listening loudly.
I think an amp with TT is a waste of money. But I haven't heard a better amp that isn't also a better DAC, as I've only compared DAVE to TT. A Hugo + GSX Mk 2 probably costs as much as TT on its own and probably sounds worse. The only other thing I've compared with TT is the Sennheiser HDVD 800 DAC and amplifier. That's worth about one-tenth of its cost, it is truly awful against TT - the DAC is an utter waste of time.
I also think a cable that costs as much as or more than HD 800 S is a waste of money.
In the end, just because people report being able to hear a difference, doesn't make it a difference that's worth the money. Sadly most people can't compare all these options unless they purchase the options, which makes comparisons a real nightmare. Or, it makes for a very active second hand market.
In the end it's very easy to take for granted just how damn good Chord's DAC/amps are. When you have to spend thousands extra to get a slight improvement it's a big clue: save your money.
It's tempting for me to say that the meaningful upgrade from Hugo is DAVE, but I haven't compared TT and Hugo, so I can't say whether I think TT is worthwhile. I suspect out of all the people who have compared Hugo and TT there's about half who think TT is worth the upgrade.