The Stax thread
Jan 14, 2007 at 8:25 AM Post #1,666 of 2,694
Azure, see if you can score a pair of SR-X/MK3s and a SRD-7... cheaper than a Lambda-type setup, and a lot of strong points... not the same bass as the SR-404s, but they do other things the 404's can't dream of...
 
Jan 14, 2007 at 8:32 AM Post #1,667 of 2,694
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carl /img/forum/go_quote.gif
I take it the K340s didn't work out for you, then.


The sound just had an "intangible," slightly undetailed quality. I'll just get a DT770 for those bass-heavy songs that the SR-404 just can't get right.


Quote:

Originally Posted by feckn_eejit /img/forum/go_quote.gif
they do other things the 404's can't dream of...


feckn_eejit - Such as?

What should I get to drive the SR-404 (The 404/313 combo was just a tad bit bright)? I'd prefer something tube-y. I plan on picking up a McAlister amp as my graduation present, but I need something in the mean time. Is there anything special about that SRM-T1 on Audiogon?
 
Jan 14, 2007 at 8:43 AM Post #1,668 of 2,694
Quote:

Originally Posted by Azure /img/forum/go_quote.gif
The sound just had an "intangible," slightly undetailed quality. I'll just get a DT770 for those bass-heavy songs that the SR-404 just can't get right.


You must have the bassier version, I'm guessing. Mine is the less bassy version, so my results have been slighly different.

I'd still rather have a 404, too, though.


Quote:

feckn_eejit - Such as?

What should I get to drive the SR-404 (The 404/313 combo was just a tad bit bright)? I'd prefer something tube-y. I plan on picking up a McAlister amp as my graduation present, but I need something in the mean time. Is there anything special about that SRM-T1 on Audiogon?


The SR-X is more natural, but less trying-to-impress sounding than the 404. They really like to be paired with a good amp, though.

The T1 is basically the same as the 006t.
 
Jan 14, 2007 at 10:14 AM Post #1,669 of 2,694
Sorry to hear about it Azure
frown.gif
Get yourself a 404/006tMk1/2 combo and you'll be happy again! EA1/4 also look pretty attractive.

A pair of Lambda Pro just went for 250GBP/488USD on eBay.co.uk
frown.gif
People are really driving up the price...
 
Jan 14, 2007 at 11:08 AM Post #1,670 of 2,694
Quote:

Originally Posted by wualta /img/forum/go_quote.gif
[closes eyes and presses fingers to temples, in the style of a psychic] Don't tell me; let me predict-- [goes into electrostatic trance] ...fantastic, explosive dynamics... I also see the SR-X reaching extremely high sound-pressure levels... whilst... remaining utterly clean and unruffled. An headphone experience like no other! -- How'd I do?


Pretty much spot on!
'Dynamic' are the first word that comes to my mind. The Doxa/SRD-7 seems to have tight control of the SR-X, and the ability to drive it to insane sound levels.
Quote:

Don't hold your breath waiting for an affordable direct drive amp that will deliver the smacktastic dynamics of a good muscular amp plus SRD-7 variant.


True! A SRD-7 MKII and power amplifier would most probably be better value for the money.
Quote:

Why Stax took this little underdog out of production is beyond me.


Me too!
It would be awesome if Stax came out with a SRD-8. But I don't see that happening.
Quote:

Originally Posted by Azure /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Selling the SR-404s was the worst decision in my entire Head-Fi life
frown.gif
frown.gif
frown.gif



We all do some bad moves sometime!
But the SR-404 are still in production, so they should be easy to get a hold of.
 
Jan 14, 2007 at 4:22 PM Post #1,674 of 2,694
Thanks for the link! That was a terrific read! Upgraditis in full swing... I need to get a new energiser (no money for preamp, poweramp, transformer box
frown.gif
well...actually no money for new energiser either
biggrin.gif
)!
 
Jan 14, 2007 at 9:31 PM Post #1,676 of 2,694
Quote:

Originally Posted by smeggy /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Me too, your inbox is full
biggrin.gif


You'll need to clear some space.



Cleared up
lambda.gif
 
Jan 15, 2007 at 3:08 AM Post #1,678 of 2,694
Quote:

Originally Posted by nothing101 /img/forum/go_quote.gif
what are the differences between the srxmk2 and mk3? has anyone even heard both?


From what I heard the Mk2 have a smaller diaphragm than the Mk3, aside from that, who knows... well, Carl probably knows as he's a smarty-pants with Stax gear.
icon10.gif
 
Jan 15, 2007 at 3:23 AM Post #1,679 of 2,694
Quote:

Originally Posted by smeggy /img/forum/go_quote.gif
From what I heard the Mk2 have a smaller diaphragm than the Mk3, aside from that, who knows... well, Carl probably knows as he's a smarty-pants with Stax gear.
icon10.gif



the mk2 has a smaller diaphram? by that you mean thinner right? then again wouldnt that make them sound better than the mk3??? interesting......
 
Jan 15, 2007 at 3:36 AM Post #1,680 of 2,694
Quote:

Originally Posted by nothing101 /img/forum/go_quote.gif
the mk2 has a smaller diaphram? by that you mean thinner right? then again wouldnt that make them sound better than the mk3??? interesting......


Not thinner, smaller surface area from what I recall. It was in a stax discussion quite a while ago so I don't remember much of what was said.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top