Deleeh
Headphoneus Supremus
It isn't so much a question of driver tubes being more or less powerful, it's a question of driver tube linearity and gain, both of which are better optimized using 6SL7 in this circuit over 12AT7, 12AY7.
I have not used 12AT7 or 12AY7 adapted into Aegis, I believe 1-2 people have tried it in the DIY version. But again, these tubes are likely to generate higher distortion than 6SL7, I would expect the subjective performance to be worse, but still sound good. I cannot say for certain, opinions would vary I'm sure.
Power output would still be sufficient for easy to drive headphones like ZMFs, but likely not enough for the more demanding planars like a Tungsten or Susvara.
Thank you for your expert answer.
So we can agree that 6SL7 is a fixed driver tube for the Aegis and works best that way.
And works better with the diversity of rectifiers and output tubes, of course also with fixed 6SL7 tubes from other manufacturers of this tube type
I alluded to the idea because my amplifier and those who have it work a little differently.
And because something was said about it in the previous reports, I wasn't sure how the Aegis works and wanted to ask before I started something that wasn't right.
So it's better not to pursue it any further or mislead people.
In fact, the amp I have here is more versatile in terms of driver tubes, not just output tubes.
And can use a whole bandwidth and it not only works, but can determine a lot of where it should go.
Still, I think the Aegis has a well-designed concept that people will get into.
Looking forward to reading more about the Zmf version and the Diy soon.