Quote:
Originally posted by bkelly
Keeping in line with the current controversy I am going to say, without exception, the 600's are far more colored than the 590's. No doubt about that in my opinion and I think I can prove it to anyone who is willing to listen. |
Not to be too contrarian, but I don't think you can, even to someone "willing to listen."
The HD 600 and the HD 590 have VERY different sounds. The HD 600 have a midbass hump and (without a cable upgrade) are a bit laid back on the top end. The HD 590 are lacking in the mids and are overly bright on top. The problem is that many people consider the "addition" of a midbass hump to be "more colored" than too much treble -- I think it comes down to the fact that many people seem to equate "audio color" to the midrange/midbass area. But that doesn't get around the fact that the HD 590 are also flawed in their own way.
Quote:
The reason the 600's sound more pleasant (I actually don't really think that is true but that is the general overall impression that fans of this phone have) is because it is so slow sounding as compared to the 590. |
Only in its stock configuration without an amp, IMO.
Quote:
In actual fact it is compressing the audio signal. |
A headphone cannot "compress" anything.
Quote:
You could take the 590 and run it through a studio grade compressor and simulate this effect. Is this more pleasant? Is it less fatiguing. Is it coloring the sound. The answer is a resounding yes to all of the above. |
And the HD 590 is also "coloring" the sound by lacking a bit in the mids and being a bit bright in the highs... is this "decompressing" the sound?
Quote:
You do not hear the stick hit the drum, the hammer strike on a piano string, the guitar pick against the tring and the bow dragging across the the strings of a violin or cello is really muted. These instruments are far more dynamic than the 600's are able to portray. This is probably also why the 590's sound bright to 600 fans. More transient information = more detail. Simple as that. |
I don't know what equipment you're using with the HD 600, but they sure don't sound like that. I hear every drum hit, every piano hit, every guitar pick, every bow scrape, every quick draw of breath, every inadvertent cymbal nick, etc. The HD 600 can portray each of these things in all their glory. If you don't think they HD 600 can do that, there are problems with either your HD 600 or your system.
Quote:
at the end of the day the 590's, win in the accuracy of portrayal debate, in a big way. The 600's are yesterdays news. |
You may prefer the HD 590, but you try to present both these statements as "fact." There's a good reason that so many people love the HD 600 over the HD 590, and it's not as easy as they being flawed listeners.