Quote:
Originally Posted by Uncle Erik /img/forum/go_quote.gif
There is a benefit to using wood and non-ferrous metals in casing. Steel, iron and other ferrous metals can magnetically couple to the circuit producing unexpected effects. Aluminum, copper and wood are terrific to use because they don't do that. Personally, I like aluminum because it is relatively inexpensive, easy to drill and provides good shielding.
Oh, and that's the other side of wood - it might not magnetically couple, but it doesn't offer much shielding. Further, wood "moves" a lot. Meaning that it changes shape and size depending on heat and humidity. If you cut your wood on a Saturday that's dry and warm, a rainy, cool Sunday will actually change the size of your cuts. Really.
Problem with amps is that they produce a lot of heat, so the wood will move every time you run it, and then will change back when the amp is off and it cools. Eventually, this is what causes cracks and splits. If your design is clever, you can get away with a wood case, but aluminum is still the safest bet.
C37 lacquer? Please. There's a big difference between a violin and a box with tubes in it. That's just pure marketing copy. Just like the spikes. If you must have brass spikes, hit up the local machine shop. They'll crank out a set for probably 10% the price of the "audiophile" version.
|
Thanks for the interesting points! Since wood is a thermal insulator the operating temperature of the circuit increases. This may affect the sound, and also the longevity of the electronics. I think it is difficult to compensate for that when "upgrading" an existing metal case to wood, besides all the woodworking issues you mentioned.
Regarding the "magic" stuff - I agree it is overpriced. However, I am still curious to try if I could get hold of it cheap (good tip with the machine shop, and there is high-grade instrument lacquer at a fraction of C37 costs). There are many positive reviews by people that appear credible. Is this all placebo effect, mass psychosis or even a scam?
We might just not have the knowledge or theory to explain the effects that could be real. For example, in the 19th century Lord Kelvin stated that the earth CANNOT be older than about 5 million years, because after some time the sun would have burned all the fuel and vanished. He arrogantly dismissed (it is physiscs!) the fossil evidence presented by Charles Darwin that suggested earth is older than one billion years. Well, Kelvin did not know about nuclear fusion...
On the other hand, there are examples for widespread mis-beliefs, some of them harmful. In the 19th century, radioactive Radon was widely advertised to cure all sorts of diseases. And I just read the sad story in the NYT that in Africa, albinos are hunted and killed, and their organs are traded because it is believed they have magical power.
Sorry for the excursion...