Alright time for one to drop out and one to move on. Based on popular demand a shot at the weigh-ins
The short of it... WA22 continues its march to the title with the B22 up next for it. Lots written on the WA22 in this thread and I would refer you to the previous comparisons.
As for the Trafomatic HeadOne, the NOS tubes closed to gap a good deal. Aside from demonstrating that rolling the rectifier can affect the performance and tonal balance its once again showed new production Sovtek to be bleh.
As for the Trafo's character, my notes show a good tonal balance though still ever so slightly tilted to the top. A lot of this has to do with its bass performance. The Trafo has a commanding grip on the drivers and tends to stop bass notes early. So the bass is present, its not recessed in any way but is lacking body in comparison. Similar to a Senn 800 in that it also has fairly flat bass all the way down but pulls its punches reducing the feel.
Texture and detail retrieval is excellent however. Where I would like more body in the bass I can't fault the completeness of instruments. Where the GS-1 and LF were primary focused, the WA22 and Trafo present the whole instrument.
Where the two are different is the WA22 has laser precise imaging. Performers are 'right there'. On the Trafo they take up more space, key more not diffused. This works quite well on jazz, blues and other similar styles. But on busier types that are percussion driven like alternative or metal it can cross over into a wall of sound. Also the level of black is ever so slightly better on the WA22. The Trafo is completely silent but the reduction of body seems to affect the sensation of going silent between notes. May have more to do with its higher white level than lower black if that makes sense.
So there you have it. The Trafo punches way above its weight class and replacement tubes cost peanuts really opening it up to a getting a good collection of alternative tubes. Something I couldn't do with the WA22 given the price of 5U4G and 6SN7 options you'd want to pursue,
So frankly I'm bummed that the amp with no preouts for my monitors keeps winning but there it is. Trafo will be going up for sale soon. Feel free to PM me if you want it and don't want to risk being sniped.
As an aside, I should mention I have been a Kevin Gilmore fan since about 2003 and along the years have had HeadAmp products based on his designs both for dynamics and stats. I fully expected the GS-1 to murder the competition on transparency and detail. The Liquid Fire was my first experience with Cavalli and left me rather lukewarm to pursue any more. The HeadOne was also my first experience with Trafomatic and must say for a company that maybe isn't well known, the product and people behind it have been awesome. I've bugged Jack enough over the years, but the WA22 is the first Woo I pull the trigger on and hear in person. To say I'm impressed would be an understatement. That said, would be a lot happier if it was designed around cheaper tube varieties like the WA6SE and WA2 are.
I'll be plugging in the B22 tomorrow to one let it warm up and two make sure it not only looks fine, but actually works after being taken apart via vibration during shipping /facepalm
I guess I shouldn't be too surprised they're the last two standing but damn I really wanted the Trafo to take it. So far, for my musical goals and genre preferences I'd rank the amps to date as such WA22 > Trafo > GS-1 > LF. Who knows maybe I've been a tube guy my whole life and never knew it. That said I know a well executed hybrid can be excellent since I still drool when I think of my time with the Anthem INT2 that I never did pull the trigger on way back when.