Mik James
Head-Fier
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2014
- Posts
- 51
- Likes
- 20
Your probably thinking i'll be suggesting multiple drivers for "moar surroundz" but no I have something else in mind
Incorporate a bass and treble driver in the same earcup with a crossover?
Whenever I read about the average open headphone in a reasonable <300$ price range there is usually the tradeoff of bass vs open sound.
So why not give a multi driver design a shot? The drivers currently used in headphones will have minimal excursion capabilities for the size, allowing for a full range sound due to the frequency gain curve afforded by the small space within the earcup. This works well until that enclosure is lost leading to less bass.
A multi driver design with a very small tweeter for the highs and a higher excursion (more bass capable) style of driver for the lows could minimize this limitation and still be perceived as point source due to the distance of the drivers from your ears.
None of this should be taken as a statement of absolute fact on my part of course. Just looking to spark a discussion on why this may not have been done before.
Complexity could certainly be a factor when you introduce crossover networks.
With the wide availability of cheap passive crossover networks these days it shouldn't be to much to ask to include them in a 100$+ pair of headphones, considering they are included in 40$ pairs of speakers (albeit unlikely to be tuned for the peak performance of the loudspeaker.
Incorporate a bass and treble driver in the same earcup with a crossover?
Whenever I read about the average open headphone in a reasonable <300$ price range there is usually the tradeoff of bass vs open sound.
So why not give a multi driver design a shot? The drivers currently used in headphones will have minimal excursion capabilities for the size, allowing for a full range sound due to the frequency gain curve afforded by the small space within the earcup. This works well until that enclosure is lost leading to less bass.
A multi driver design with a very small tweeter for the highs and a higher excursion (more bass capable) style of driver for the lows could minimize this limitation and still be perceived as point source due to the distance of the drivers from your ears.
None of this should be taken as a statement of absolute fact on my part of course. Just looking to spark a discussion on why this may not have been done before.
Complexity could certainly be a factor when you introduce crossover networks.
With the wide availability of cheap passive crossover networks these days it shouldn't be to much to ask to include them in a 100$+ pair of headphones, considering they are included in 40$ pairs of speakers (albeit unlikely to be tuned for the peak performance of the loudspeaker.