Why isn't it enough to have a buffered PSU?
Apr 7, 2002 at 3:42 PM Thread Starter Post #1 of 6

Joe Bloggs

Sponsor: HiBy
Member of the Trade: EFO Technologies Co, YanYin Technology
His Porta Corda walked the Green Mile
Joined
Oct 21, 2001
Posts
12,785
Likes
5,928
Location
Hong Kong and Melbourne
Whatever the kind of PSU it is, (switched, linear, regulated, non-regulated and whatnot) if you have a nice fat capacitor in parallel with the load buffering the voltage output, isn't it going to hold the voltage constant anyway? (and even if there is any fluctuation it wouldn't be high-freq noise, right??)

So why do you *have* to have a 'linear', 'regulated' power supply?
 
HiBy Stay updated on HiBy at their facebook, website or email (icons below). Stay updated on HiBy at their sponsor profile on Head-Fi.
 
https://www.facebook.com/hibycom https://store.hiby.com/ service@hiby.com
Apr 8, 2002 at 3:08 AM Post #2 of 6
C'mon, no response to any of my queries about PSUs... don't anybody here know anything about this?
biggrin.gif
 
HiBy Stay updated on HiBy at their facebook, website or email (icons below). Stay updated on HiBy at their sponsor profile on Head-Fi.
 
https://www.facebook.com/hibycom https://store.hiby.com/ service@hiby.com
Apr 8, 2002 at 5:04 AM Post #3 of 6
Well, the primary reason you can't just put a large capacitor on there is that large capacitors (electrolytics in particular) generally have poor high-frequency response. So you'd have to go with ceramics or whatnot, which have small capacitance.

There are two primary concerns in building a power supply for audio: Noise and ripple.

Ripple is the 50/60Hz variation in the DC voltage caused by the original 50/60Hz VAC. You can never get rid of it entirely, but you can work towards it. A good linear regulator can provide around 60-80 dB of ripple rejection; more if you add more filter capacitors in various places. You will definately notice a 60Hz tone in your audio; this is the cause of the charateristic hum of AC transformers.

The other concern is noise; the AC line will likely contain noise from other audio equipment, people's telephone conversations, your neightbor's washing machine, computer equipment, etc. Most of this shouldn't be at audible frequencies, but you can bet some of it will be (look at a spectrum analyzer if you care to see how much is in your power). As I pointed out before, you can't really get rid of it with just a big capacitor, because it's too high-frequency.

A switching power supply will introduce noise of its own as it switches on and off, so it's right out.

An unregulated power supply assumes the input voltage is at some particular level -- definately not a valid assumption, even if you're running off batteries. And a switching power supply will introduce noise of its own as it switches on and off.

So that basically leaves you with a regulated linear supply. From there you can get better ripple and noise rejection by putting capacitors all over the place. If you're building with discrete transistors, you can probably improve ripply rejection by ensuring all nodes of each transistor are buffered. Even if you're using e.g. an LM317, you should still ensure all pins are buffered.

And don't forget the big cap on the output anyway; it helps protect you from large current swings on the load. Generally you should have a large electrolytic (preferably tantalum) capacitor and one or more ceramic capacitors to pick up high-frequency stuff.
 
Apr 8, 2002 at 5:40 AM Post #4 of 6
Thanks vectro, and welcome to Head-Fi
smily_headphones1.gif


Quote:

Well, the primary reason you can't just put a large capacitor on there is that large capacitors (electrolytics in particular) generally have poor high-frequency response. So you'd have to go with ceramics or whatnot, which have small capacitance.


How is it possible for a cap to have 'poor high-frequency response'? A cap is a cap... right?
redface.gif


And when you say it has poor high-freq response, do you mean that it would leave the high-freq noise pretty much as it is? How is that possible?
confused.gif
 
HiBy Stay updated on HiBy at their facebook, website or email (icons below). Stay updated on HiBy at their sponsor profile on Head-Fi.
 
https://www.facebook.com/hibycom https://store.hiby.com/ service@hiby.com
Apr 8, 2002 at 11:10 PM Post #5 of 6
I think vectro meant ESR. in the electrolytic capacitor that can couple noise.

Cap are constructed differently. They definitely are constructed differently. Personally, I don't think can hear the difference in cap. However, electrolytic caps are not recommended in the signal path.

Feel free to PM me. If you have any question, I used to be a voltage regulator and DAC chip engineer.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top