Navyblue
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2008
- Posts
- 1,674
- Likes
- 15
Quote:
It actually made me question how are the IEMs sounded through your ears, and what "neutrality" means to you.
I do not consider the SA6 as neutral at all, in fact I thought it is on the more coloured side, even the UEs are more neutral than SA6 to me, definitely no where as accurate as ER-4.
I am afraid the q-Jays will obsolete before the ER-4 does.
ER-4 is designed as professional stage monitor, with accuracy as prime consideration and looks conspicuous, it's been around since forever, and will continue to be for quite a while. Whereas the Jays are designed for consumer use, where things tend to get replaced quickly by new models.
Originally Posted by _Toki_ /img/forum/go_quote.gif I think the latter ones have less coloured sound than q-jays, a bit close to etys. |
It actually made me question how are the IEMs sounded through your ears, and what "neutrality" means to you.
I do not consider the SA6 as neutral at all, in fact I thought it is on the more coloured side, even the UEs are more neutral than SA6 to me, definitely no where as accurate as ER-4.
I am afraid the q-Jays will obsolete before the ER-4 does.