Why FLAC is better.
Jun 2, 2010 at 12:16 AM Post #166 of 176


Quote:
it was only a matter of time for this classic to get bumped :) 


LOL! ya i was thinking the same.  i was forced to read through almost the whole thing again.
 
Jun 3, 2010 at 9:46 PM Post #167 of 176
“What this means is that for each year the MP3 sits on your hard drive, it will lose roughly 12kbps, assuming you have SATA – it’s about 15kbps on IDE, but only 7kbps on SCSI, due to rotational velocidensity. ”
 
 
 
 
 
 
So, every year the MP3 will be losing data? Like sand?
Let's take a try, put a 64kbps MP3 on your hard disk, let's find one oldest IDE hard drive, and put it their for like 5years, this MP3 data file will be dissappeared?? What a crazy thought!
 
Jun 5, 2010 at 9:03 AM Post #168 of 176
Regarding digital dust: The reason this happens is that as a portion of the disk travels under the head, the top of the bit is actually scraped off. Over time, this results in decreased fidelity. I have been working on a carbide tipped bit for use in newer drives that are resistant to this kind of degradation. Simple yet ingenious. Retrofitting drives to use this technology involved hooking the drive up to two pumps, one to suck out the old bits, and the other to force the new bits onto the drive platters. I was able to upgrade a 1 TB drive in about 7 minutes. I'll let you all know when it is ready for commercial purchase, but it should be around Q3 2010.
 
Nov 29, 2011 at 1:37 AM Post #173 of 176
The thread started obviously has been drinking too much cheap Pabst Blue Ribbon beer, all of that rice in there fries the brain........The moral of the story is "Drink good beer"!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Nov 29, 2011 at 6:21 AM Post #174 of 176
Definitely Blue Ribbon Beer
 
Nov 29, 2011 at 6:21 AM Post #175 of 176
http://www.d-e-f-i-n-i-t-e-l-y.com/
 
lol
 
Nov 29, 2011 at 7:53 AM Post #176 of 176

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top