DavidMahler
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2007
- Posts
- 4,124
- Likes
- 354
Anyone notice how The Ramones, Sex Pistols, Patti Smith, Clash, Wire, Blondie, Rancid, Green Day get endorsed heavily by critics, but then....
Judas Priest, Iron Maiden, Metallica, Antrhax, Megadeth, Motley Crue etc get bashed, or at least in their time got bashed by the critics.
There's really such a thin line between metal and punk especially in the early days. I personally appreciate both genres, but I just don't understand why metal is just not endorsed by the critics in the same regard
Progressive Rock has always been a genre that has been dismissed by the critics in bulk, but I think this is because most rock critics do not understand it, rock and roll is 3/4/5/ maybe 6 chords, so to hear players writing and playing in a style nearly as demanding as a Beethoven or Brahms work is enough reason for them to dismiss and say "if I wanted to listen to technical perfection, I wouldn't be a rock critic" etc.
But as far as metal, there is so much overlap in attitude with punk, that I just don't get the dismissal.
Judas Priest, Iron Maiden, Metallica, Antrhax, Megadeth, Motley Crue etc get bashed, or at least in their time got bashed by the critics.
There's really such a thin line between metal and punk especially in the early days. I personally appreciate both genres, but I just don't understand why metal is just not endorsed by the critics in the same regard
Progressive Rock has always been a genre that has been dismissed by the critics in bulk, but I think this is because most rock critics do not understand it, rock and roll is 3/4/5/ maybe 6 chords, so to hear players writing and playing in a style nearly as demanding as a Beethoven or Brahms work is enough reason for them to dismiss and say "if I wanted to listen to technical perfection, I wouldn't be a rock critic" etc.
But as far as metal, there is so much overlap in attitude with punk, that I just don't get the dismissal.