Quote:
Originally Posted by Alick
So what was incorrect? '+' instead of '?' Out by a factor of 10? uV insted of mV?
'fess up, Mike...
|
OK.
I've really been testing the LM6171 without output caps extensively over the past couple of days whilst the rest of you have probably been stuffing yourself with turkey
I tried 6 x LM6171's and no two gave measurements that suggested simply whacking a resistor between 3 & 4 is the ideal solution.
With 10M all of the results were "-mV" and here are the results:
Chip 1: -48.1mV
Chip 2: -41.3mV
Chip 3: -23.5mV
Chip 4: -13.7mV
Chip 5: -37.2mV
Chip 6: -25.8mV
With 15M all of the results were "+mV" and here are the results:
Chip 1: +15.9mV
Chip 2: +24.7mV
Chip 3: +34.9mV
Chip 4: +49.0mV
Chip 5: +27.8mV
Chip 6: +31.2mV
I made up quite a few 15M resistors using 3 x 10M resistors suitably configured (series / parallel) to make 15M:
Pretty small chips to work with but easy when you get the hang of it.
I then tested each one and selected 6 which where pretty spot on to 15M and then encased these 6 "modules" in hot glue to ensure there was no way of them coming apart:
I attached these "modules" to the 6 x LM6171's and identified them by heatshrinking different colours onto their wires.
I used the left channel of the WNA to perform the tests and then the right channel...... both channels measured pretty identical using the same LM6171 in each channel.
My conclusions are that neither 10M or 15M can be considered "ideal" as all of the chips have to be individually "tuned" to give very low offset.. simply sticking a 15M between 3&4 is far from satisfactory.
If you are going to remove the output caps I strongly suggest you have a few different resistors to hand as you'll have to "make" the correct ohmage resistor to suit each individual LM6171..... it could be anywhere from 10M to 16M dependant on the individual LM6171 you have... from the above results 12M - 13M may be a good starting point but be prepared to spend a
very long time finding the value that will give you zero offset.
I listened to a WNA with the two lowest offset measured LM6171's fitted (-13.7mV & 25.8mV) against a WNA with output caps fitted:
I won't waste time typing here as I could hear "no" difference between the two.... NO difference at all.
So, is it worth removing the output caps? IMO no it isn't. With the output caps in place there is ZERO offset and, as such, the full dynamic range will not be affected (any dc offset will pull or push the diaphragm away from its resting point which will reduce it's travel in one direction whilst uselessly increasing it in the other direction) You also risk blowing the crap out of your headphones if one of those resistors falls off
Nope, I can fully understand why Dr. White has chosen to use output caps.... zero dc offset, guaranteed protection for your headphones and all this with minimum (if any) insertion loss.....
Just my two cents but output caps it is for me considering the variations between LM6171's.... if a set value resistor gave an exact offset reading with "every" LM6171 then fine but due to the wide fluctuations output caps are the bullet proof solution.
Merry Christmas!