which sealed headphone for distortion
May 16, 2008 at 6:28 PM Thread Starter Post #1 of 16

argyledk

New Head-Fier
Joined
Apr 2, 2008
Posts
25
Likes
0
Hi everyone

I really need advice as to which sealed headphones will best suit my listening preferences.
Let me first make clear that the phones have to be sealed since I can't escape a noise environment when listening.

I listen to a lot of bands such as Greenday, Dinosaur Jr, Raveonettes, Jesus & mary chain, that use a lot of 'thick' distortion, which several cans I've listened to handle in a 'muddy' and sometimes 'tinny' way (sorry for my lack of appropriate vocab).

I have so far auditioned these candidates:
- AH-D2000
- AH-D1001
- DT 770/80
- AKG K271
- ATH M50

I didn't like either of the Denons (for various reasons), but I am considering the AKG and the Beyers, even though both have their faults IMO (DTs = recessed mids, AKGs = a bit lean in the bass).

While auditioning I always compared to my beloved PX100s, and every time, to my surprise and frustration, I ended up preferring the sound of these signifantly less expensive (and open) cans

I would be very grateful for any thoughts and suggestions.
 
May 16, 2008 at 6:34 PM Post #2 of 16
I think it's time to audition the Sennheiser HD265 if you can find a pair.
 
May 17, 2008 at 8:51 AM Post #3 of 16
Thanks Jaska
the HD265 look very interesting, but I can't seem to find a store anywhere that carry them. Are they discontinued?

Anyone else know of other possible candidates?
 
May 17, 2008 at 1:11 PM Post #5 of 16
Argyledk, why didn't you liked the Denons? From what I read about them, they seem to do a good job with your musical tast.
 
May 17, 2008 at 3:51 PM Post #6 of 16
You're absolutely right Tiemen. I read extensively about the D2000s here on Head-fi and really expected them to be 'the right' headphone for my preferences, since most people here seems to love them.
I was really disappointed when I actually heard them though. They may not have been burned in (demos in a store), but still, I expected them to sound better out of the box.

Firstly, I have to admit that they have an impressive soundstage for a sealed can, and there are enough detail to satisfy most listeners. But I didn't like the way bass seems separate from mids and highs. They are quite bass heavy, but the bass is not very tight IMO, rather messy actually, and it sort of feels as if belonging to another part of the sound spectrum than the mids and highs. The highs were clear, but the mids were not very full. Perhaps a better word would be tinny.

I auditioned the D1000 as well, and while I actually preferred the bass handling of the D1000 to the D2000, its soundstage is way narrower. It is clearly a much cheaper headphone, but for about a 100 Euros I guess its not bad.

I think I just realized that the Denons are not for me
frown.gif
 
May 17, 2008 at 4:43 PM Post #7 of 16
Quote:

Originally Posted by katanka /img/forum/go_quote.gif
not that i have personally heard them, but from lots of reading you should try the ultrasone HFI-780, preferably with a cable mod


No offense, but this comment is worthless, especially the part about the recable. This is the kind of post that generates hype and flavor of the months. Listen for yourself and then comment, everybody hears things differently.
 
May 17, 2008 at 4:47 PM Post #8 of 16
Quote:

Originally Posted by argyledk /img/forum/go_quote.gif
I didn't like the way bass seems separate from mids and highs. They are quite bass heavy, but the bass is not very tight IMO, rather messy actually, and it sort of feels as if belonging to another part of the sound spectrum than the mids and highs. The highs were clear, but the mids were not very full. Perhaps a better word would be tinny.(


biggrin.gif
I think you just described the bass of the DT 770 as well.
I couldn't have said it better.
With the stock 770 I have the feeling that the bass is leading a life of it's own.
 
May 17, 2008 at 6:45 PM Post #9 of 16
Quote:

Originally Posted by gp_hebert /img/forum/go_quote.gif
No offense, but this comment is worthless, especially the part about the recable. This is the kind of post that generates hype and flavor of the months. Listen for yourself and then comment, everybody hears things differently.


Wise words mate. I wish everyone writting in this forum spoke just of what he/she has experienced first hand. I can't understand those posts advising things very different from the ones the OP asked about 8O.

Rgrds
 
May 17, 2008 at 6:56 PM Post #10 of 16
I suggest buying or building an amplifier if you don't have one.

What may seem muddy often isn't the fault of the headphones. It's lack of power and poor control that makes it seem that way.
 
May 17, 2008 at 7:22 PM Post #11 of 16
At home I use a Beresford DAC from my PC and a EyeTek tube amp (identical to the Fatman Itube), both IMO warm sounding.
When auditioning the Denons at the store, however, it was on a Denon D-M33, which is not high-end but still supposed to be pretty decent.
What I perceived as tinny in the D2000s may have had something to do with the difference between these amps/dacs, I perceived the Denon M33 to sound a bit on the cold side, but I still heard plenty of bass, just not very well integrated bass and not very tight/fast.

IMO great handling of distortion is mostly about midrange, but in order to not sound muddy, bass has to be fast and well integrated with mids.
And this combination seems to be the real challenge in a sealed can around or under the $250 range, but please share your experiences. There must be at least a couple of sealed cans out there great at handling distortion without sounding muddy or tinny.
 
May 19, 2008 at 5:24 AM Post #14 of 16
I (tried to) listen to the new Ravonettes album with my revealing markl modded/recabled D2000s, but I could not finish the 1st song. There is a difference between wanted distortion which I enjoy (Nine Inch Nails) and the Ravonettes album, which was clipping HEAPS.

My point is, some things sound BETTER on lesser equipment, and that is a good thing sometimes. The higher up you go, the more the flaws are apparent, and once your ears hear them - they never forget.

With the Denons, you know when the bass is recorded muddily, and when the cymbals are clipping. This type of detail is BAD and not a benefit for some music, as it is a PLUS with others.

Use a nice equaliser to cut the offending frequencies, but make sure not to increase any as that will generally make things worse.

Good luck!
wink.gif
 
May 19, 2008 at 8:30 AM Post #15 of 16
Quote:

Originally Posted by MuseMan /img/forum/go_quote.gif
My point is, some things sound BETTER on lesser equipment, and that is a good thing sometimes. The higher up you go, the more the flaws are apparent, and once your ears hear them - they never forget.


This is so true, and the reason for me to use sometimes my cheap HD 201.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top