Quote:
Originally Posted by intoart /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Yes, I am well aware that others come here to learn about their choices before spending good money. That is why I recommend headphones that I know to be both excellent in absolute terms and great value for the price.
|
But the problem with your posting is that "absolute terms" are already a lie. One can describe the qualities of a headphone as one hears them through one's own system(s), and then, through a more or less general consensus of other experienced listeners with various rigs, readers who are looking to purchase a headphone can get a pretty good idea of the characteristics and what's needed to bring out that sound. The other difficulty is that although your opinion deserves space on this board, the general consensus of folks with experience with many headphones and many different rigs is that although the 770s/80s, have many pleasing attributes, including the bass and the fact that they're closed (for those who need that) and are also affordable (very important), they are not the best or most realistic sounding headphones, even in the bass, by far. So, most experienced listeners say one thing, and you say another. No biggie, but just know that many people disagree with your opinion, expect to encounter it, get over it, and move on.
Quote:
I may be relatively new to headphones (I have owned about 10 and heard maybe 7 or 8 others), but I have been into high end stereo systems for decades, so I most certainly do know a tremendous amount about amps, sources, and speakers. |
Excellent. I'm not sure what a "tremendous" amount means, but good for you. I asked you in another thread to outline that experience so those of us who are trying, with patience, to pay attention to your words might have a frame of reference by which to gauge your "absolute terms." Since you didn't answer there, I'm going to ask again here. You can talk about your various experience with speaker rigs if you choose, but since this is a headphone forum, I again ask you to name which headphones you have owned or have had loaned to you for a least a couple weeks, and also discuss which sources, amps, etc you specifically used with each since, as you know, they play an important part.
Quote:
The people who degrade the board are the audio snobs who think that realistic bass is bad and/or that you have to spend $600+ to get great headphones. |
Seriously. Realistic bass is bad? Snobs? Who the heck are you talking about? Every person I know who has expensive gear has had and probably still has budget gear they enjoy very much, places a great value on bang for the buck, and is sensitive when making recommendations to others, who, for whatever reason, are looking for modestly priced gear to enjoy. On the other hand, I hope we're allowed to talk about the qualities of higher priced headphones on a audio forum without being called snobs simply for having the good fortune to own them or even hearing some at a meet. It is simply a reality that many of the higher priced headphones have better sq than less expensive headphones. Being able to talk about those differences on an audio forum is not an act of snobbery. The truth is that the O2 MK1s with a KGBH SE and a good source wipe the floor with the bass quality and realism of the DT770/80s even with paired with great components, as do the HE90s with the ES1 or Aristeaus, as do the bass-heavy R10s, even with a freaking ipod and portable amp. Do I go around recommending those to everyone or trashing others' happy experiences with DT770s? Of course not, and I actually like the DT770/80s a bit. Being able to speak truthfully and make comparisons, even between expensive and inexpensive gear, should be allowed on an audio forum without being accused of snobbery. Get over yourself.