Which has the most influence in SQ?

Feb 17, 2008 at 11:01 PM Post #31 of 31
Quote:

Originally Posted by ericj /img/forum/go_quote.gif
The first one is blowing things way out of proportion with regard to what he thinks is transient current spikes and clipping behavior, and he's obviously ignorant of the details of things like capacitor performance and power transformer design.

he's also theorizing about an ostensibly immesurable problem that would be easily measured by a good high-resolution digital storage 'scope. Given the controversy you'd think someone might have rented the equipment for a week and proven the issue by now. It's not a hard experiment to set up.

I think it's funny how the second one uses the power company's field transformers as a basis to refute the 'miles and miles of wire' theory and ignores the step-down transformer in his own equipment.

the third guy is saying the same thing i am.



Hmmm... well, I must gracefully bow out, because this all is now certainly slipping slipping past my full understanding. Ever wanna discuss gestural/acoustic/aerodynamic phonetics, and I'll probably be able to hold my own! I know when I'm out of my league in other areas, though.

Maybe my mind is tricking me, but at least it's tricking me in a good way. I guess I'd rather spend little money, and have my mind think that my ears are hearing a big difference, than spend much money, and truly only hear a slight sonic improvement. Call me naive, but I think I'm content with this.

Thanks for all of your knowledge on the subject!
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top