[CyriusG]

First post here but here you go.
I'm using DarkOne 3.0.1 with a few small tweaks.
 

 

[policographo]

I gotta find out.
How do you set up a rating system on foobar? Like a proper star system a la Windows Media Player? If it's possible it would make F2K surely perfect. I've tried again and again and it just doesn't seem t work. If you can provide components and simplish instructions that would be really helpful.
 
I'll post my set up later, i'm still getting it set up cuz i migrated to another computer.

 

[manaox2]

 
Quote:

I gotta find out.
How do you set up a rating system on foobar? Like a proper star system a la Windows Media Player? If it's possible it would make F2K surely perfect. I've tried again and again and it just doesn't seem t work. If you can provide components and simplish instructions that would be really helpful.
 
I'll post my set up later, i'm still getting it set up cuz i migrated to another computer.

 
 
http://winamp2foobar.blogspot.com/2008/09/rating.html

 

[Griffinhart]

My roommate just adds an extra metadata field to his songs and rates them on a 1-100 scale.
 
(I find that to be mathematically unbalanced, since, according to him, he'd never listen to/own any songs that he would rate < 50, which totally skews his statistics...)
 
-- Griffinhart

 

[epyon]

Here is a theme I downloaded.  Pretty clean and functional I think.  
 

 

[thegreat682]

Quote:

I gotta find out.
How do you set up a rating system on foobar? Like a proper star system a la Windows Media Player? If it's possible it would make F2K surely perfect. I've tried again and again and it just doesn't seem t work. If you can provide components and simplish instructions that would be really helpful.
 
I'll post my set up later, i'm still getting it set up cuz i migrated to another computer.

 
You might want to check out foo_playcount.  Keeps track of when each file was added to the library, how many times it has been played, when it was last played, and a 5 star rating system.  http://www.foobar2000.org/components/view/foo_playcount
 
 

 

[sh4w]

just updated my setup!

 

[Griffinhart]

I've always thought about doing lyrics, but then I'd have to go and look for lyrics for my songs, and that sounds like work. D:
 
Though, seeing all these layouts with a waveform seek bar... going to add that to my setup.

-- Griffinhart

 

[Roller]

Quote:

I've always thought about doing lyrics, but then I'd have to go and look for lyrics for my songs, and that sounds like work. D:
 
Though, seeing all these layouts with a waveform seek bar... going to add that to my setup.

-- Griffinhart

 
Not sure how accelerated waveform plugins have been evolving lately, but when I last checked them, months ago, they weren't optimized enough and used more system resources than they actually required. But it certainly is a nifty thing

 

[Griffinhart]

f2k's holding stable at under 180MB of RAM for me, so I'd say that's no big deal.
 
Firefox, on the other hand, is leaking up to 2GB again...
 
-- Griffinhart

 

[Roller]

Quote:

f2k's holding stable at under 180MB of RAM for me, so I'd say that's no big deal.
 
Firefox, on the other hand, is leaking up to 2GB again...
 
-- Griffinhart

 
First of all, that a ton of RAM being used for foobar

Mine uses less than half of that but, truth be told, I focus very little on UI features (that seem to consume more resources than they should) and a lot on components and VSTs, which are more CPU than RAM intensive.
 
Second, Firefox 4 leaks more RAM due to addon developers not having optimized their FF4 versions, and I mean haven't optimized at all. I was forced to disable several addons in order to close a severe memory leak that ended up using all available memory.
A very good reference guide on current state of addons is this: https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/performance/

 

[Griffinhart]

Yeah, I'm told I run a pretty heavy f2k setup, but I actually don't run all that much visualization stuff (though, I do have the shpeck component installed, if not currently in use...)
 
-- Griffinhart

 

[Roller]

Oh, I wasn't even talking about shpeck, which isn't RAM intensive, but CPU and GPU intensive. You'll see what I mean when you start using the waveform bar (assuming the plugins are in a similar state).

 

[BobSaysHi]

Another DarkOne user here.

 
If you couldn't tell, album art is important to me. I have a 28 inch monitor. Also, I have yet to update the album art of this to a better scan.

 

[Griffinhart]

28" and you're running it at 1920x1200? Sadness.
 
Disregard the above, I wasn't thinking 16:10. Herpderp.
 
-- Griffinhart