ryanjsoo
Reviewer for The Headphone List
ryanjsoo's Reviews
I`ve had the ie800`s for almost a year and they are without a doubt the best in-ears I`ve heard, I recently tried the se846 and whilst they are admittedly the better overall package, the sound of the ie800`s is on a whole better. I`ve also owned the se535ltd`s and ie8`s for a while. What I found was:
se535 weaknesses:
-Poor extension on both ends of the spectrum, very little sub-bass, recessed highs, strained treble
-Midrange forward (though I like that so not really an issue)
-Build quality, nozzle can snap off, mmcx connector fails, I didn`t have these issues though
-Doesn`t convey as much detail as other high-end iems
ie8 weaknesses:
-Too much mid bass colors mids
-Recessed mids
-Little isolation
se846 remedies:
-Better bass response
-Build is better, bolstered mmcx, metal nozzle
-Highs still an issue
ie800 remedies:
-Mid Bass neutral
-Cleanest midrange of any iem
-Highs are much clearer but too forward to my liking
-isolation is much better, not as good as shures but atleast anything else with a good fit
-Ceramic shells don`t scratch or dink so they are pretty hardy
-No plastic
Of course both iems are overall better than their older counterparts but Shure have not really remedied their primary weakness, their highs and clarity/details, if they had done so I would have bought them but Shure remains disappointing and the ie800`s are here to stay. That is not to say the ie800`s are better, they most certainly are not, but the sound and build are both a little step up and the design is a big step down, they really are great in design but poor in execution and it ends up depending on the buyer`s priorities, but I personally like the discrete look of the Sennheisers and no one has ever said to me they looked cheap but instead complemented their mature yet bold styling, then they put them in their ears....
se535 weaknesses:
-Poor extension on both ends of the spectrum, very little sub-bass, recessed highs, strained treble
-Midrange forward (though I like that so not really an issue)
-Build quality, nozzle can snap off, mmcx connector fails, I didn`t have these issues though
-Doesn`t convey as much detail as other high-end iems
ie8 weaknesses:
-Too much mid bass colors mids
-Recessed mids
-Little isolation
se846 remedies:
-Better bass response
-Build is better, bolstered mmcx, metal nozzle
-Highs still an issue
ie800 remedies:
-Mid Bass neutral
-Cleanest midrange of any iem
-Highs are much clearer but too forward to my liking
-isolation is much better, not as good as shures but atleast anything else with a good fit
-Ceramic shells don`t scratch or dink so they are pretty hardy
-No plastic
Of course both iems are overall better than their older counterparts but Shure have not really remedied their primary weakness, their highs and clarity/details, if they had done so I would have bought them but Shure remains disappointing and the ie800`s are here to stay. That is not to say the ie800`s are better, they most certainly are not, but the sound and build are both a little step up and the design is a big step down, they really are great in design but poor in execution and it ends up depending on the buyer`s priorities, but I personally like the discrete look of the Sennheisers and no one has ever said to me they looked cheap but instead complemented their mature yet bold styling, then they put them in their ears....