what's the most common resistor you guys use?

Oct 16, 2005 at 5:51 AM Post #16 of 31
Quote:

Originally Posted by DaKi][er
There are tolerances and limits in lots of electronics parts and you can push them if you know how they have an effect (but if you can help it, keep everything in spec)


That being said - some tolerances SHULD be taken as the absolute maximum dont-pass-it-or-we-will-send-killer-goats-after you.

Rob.
 
Oct 16, 2005 at 6:14 AM Post #17 of 31
Quote:

Originally Posted by robzy
That being said - some tolerances SHULD be taken as the absolute maximum dont-pass-it-or-we-will-send-killer-goats-after you.

Rob.



my understanding is like overclocking a CPU,
icon10.gif
 
Oct 16, 2005 at 6:49 AM Post #18 of 31
I prefer Vishay-Dale RN55 or RN60 1% series (depending on the pcb's lead spacing and power requirements). They are superb quality but are not obcenely priced like most "boutique" resistors. Despite the sausage appearance I really like the fact that they are marked with actual numerals. Maybe my eyes are going bad, but I have a hard time with color bands nowadays.

That said, I doubt that you will hear or measure an actual difference between any good quality metal film resistors in a headphone amp application. Panasonic, Yageo, Koa-Speer, Xicon, ... they are all good.

For active filter or phono stage RIAA EQ use, sometimes I go with 0.1% resistors for accuracy.
 
Oct 16, 2005 at 11:20 AM Post #19 of 31
Quote:

Originally Posted by nikongod
vishay rn55 resistors are "under-rated" to comply with/meet military specs.


in other words: for real-life usage scenarios, a 1/8W rn55 would be equivalent to a 1/4W generic, and a 1/4W rn55 would be equivalent to a 1/2W generic.
 
Oct 16, 2005 at 4:52 PM Post #20 of 31
Quote:

Originally Posted by amb
They are superb quality but are not obcenely priced like most "boutique" resistors. Despite the sausage appearance I really like the fact that they are marked with actual numerals.


I'm with AMB in the fact that I really appreciate the easy to recognize numeric marking system on VD resistors. It makes trouble shooting so much easier, provided that you take the time to have the value face up, which I do.

My 2¢,

Nate
 
Oct 16, 2005 at 5:19 PM Post #21 of 31
Quote:

Originally Posted by n_maher
I'm with AMB in the fact that I really appreciate the easy to recognize numeric marking system on VD resistors. It makes trouble shooting so much easier, provided that you take the time to have the value face up, which I do.


PRP, Holco, Kiwame, and a few others (Mills, Reidon, Ohmite) also do this. I agree it is a nice feature.
 
Oct 16, 2005 at 5:38 PM Post #22 of 31
Quote:

Originally Posted by adhoc
in other words: for real-life usage scenarios, a 1/8W rn55 would be equivalent to a 1/4W generic, and a 1/4W rn55 would be equivalent to a 1/2W generic.


RN55 is 1/8W. 1/4W will be RN60, which is a fatter sausage...
k1000smile.gif
 
Oct 16, 2005 at 9:02 PM Post #24 of 31
Quote:

Originally Posted by diablo9
RN55 is 1/8W. 1/4W will be RN60, which is a fatter sausage...
k1000smile.gif



my 2.0ghz amd chip shows up in the windows "observation" utility as running at 2.4ghz...

military standards require that the resistors be rated at that rating. "non-military" consumer standards, the resistors are capiable of tollerating much more power disipation.
 
Oct 17, 2005 at 2:13 AM Post #25 of 31
Quote:

Originally Posted by diablo9
RN55 is 1/8W. 1/4W will be RN60, which is a fatter sausage...
k1000smile.gif



no no - you must have misunderstood me.

what i meant was that the RN series are milspec resistors, hence the milspec rating of '1/8W' for the RN55 would corresspond to 1/4W for a 'civilian' resistor.
 
Oct 17, 2005 at 2:49 AM Post #26 of 31
Quote:

Originally Posted by adhoc
no no - you must have misunderstood me.

what i meant was that the RN series are milspec resistors, hence the milspec rating of '1/8W' for the RN55 would corresspond to 1/4W for a 'civilian' resistor.



really? I didn't know that! no wonder in all those "post your build" pics, they are full of little sausages! I should know this earlier then I don't have to stuck on Yageo generic ones.
 
Oct 17, 2005 at 2:55 AM Post #27 of 31
Quote:

Originally Posted by diablo9
really? I didn't know that!


Just for independent confirmation puposes you should read this. Also, this confirms my belief that the military really does practice the "Why buy one when you can have two at twice the price?" theory.
icon10.gif


Nate
 
Oct 18, 2005 at 12:58 AM Post #28 of 31
Quote:

Originally Posted by amb
I prefer Vishay-Dale RN55 or RN60 1% series (depending on the pcb's lead spacing and power requirements). ...Despite the sausage appearance I really like the fact that they are marked with actual numerals...


YES! Who ever decided that color bands were a good way to code resistors wasn't color "blind". I've NEVER been able to read resistor values by color bands (this a sex chromosome linked trait, and thus common in men). Although it's a bit tedious, you can easily sort out Vishay-Dale resistors if they end up in a pile on the bench, and I always mount them with the values facing up. It makes trouble shooting at the end of the build sooooo much easier.......
 
Oct 18, 2005 at 1:05 AM Post #29 of 31
Just so folks who aren't familiar with Vishay Dale resistors get an idea of what we're talking about here's a shot of my PPA. Pretty dang easy to figure out what is what, eh? For example the 1001F resistor located to the vacant R7R position is a 1000 ohm resistor. 100 + 1 zero. The 4703F located down and to the left from that, 470,000ohm or 470kohm. You get the picture, literally
wink.gif
.

original.jpg
 
Oct 18, 2005 at 1:37 AM Post #30 of 31
something nice about color-coded resistors is it dosnt mater if your in a rush and solder em in "upside-down" but you should not rush anyways...

edit: happy post numbero 1000 to me.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top