I used to like Reddit, I still do actually to see people post impressions of their gear, but that place has become about as cult-like as Head-Fi. There’s a flock of people who cling to the Harman response curve and try to force feed the data to people. Objective opinions run rampant.
Just recently I asked a question about whether I should buy a certain headphone, if it were worth it or not, and listed what I owned currently (and what I’m happy with) and they suggested I upgrade my closed back (my 177X Go, which costs $380). I was expecting them to recommend pricier options but their first suggestion was the AKG K371, a $150 headphone that’s been getting praise (and way more hype than it deserves) because it follows the Harman target more closely than any other headphone.
Impressive yes, and it is a good headphone. I actually own it and like it but not as much as the Beyer 177X. It loses in terms of detail, imaging and soundstage. I said this and they told me “don’t judge the K371 by its price, it beats ANY HEADPHONE SONICALLY AT ANY PRICE POINT...”
Now hold on...again I think it’s great that it follows Harman so accurately but really? I chimed back again saying sorry, I like it but not as much, because the 177X has a more immersive soundstage. The user then tried to tell me that soundstage has very little to do with the headphone.
This is what I mean. There are people around there parading Harman and it’s partially because one of their top Reddit users is an engineer who backs the Harman response. I like their work and their contributions to the subreddit, and I like Harman, but when it starts to turn into something like “everything needs to be Harman tuned” and people start saying things like soundstage is bs to defend the flaws, is where I start losing my interest.