andrzejpw
May one day invent Bose-cancelling headphones.
- Joined
- Jun 25, 2001
- Posts
- 6,636
- Likes
- 10
But will my eye really strengthen, or will it get overworked?
Originally posted by HappymaN Hirsch, I was talking to an opthamologist who is a professor at my medical school, and he said that the development of my "short-sightedness" had nothing to do with how close I read, or how close I sit to my monitor/television. |
Originally posted by andrzejpw But will my eye really strengthen, or will it get overworked? |
Originally posted by Strogian Anyway, I figure that the basic cause of my problem (exactly like yours -- fine in one eye, nearsighted in the other) was looking at things close-up. When you're focusing near, the muscles in your eye are constantly working to bend the eye's lens. If you maintain that too long, either the muscles will refuse to relax, or maybe the lens will actually become permanently deformed. I don't know which, really. But in any case, you won't see far-off things with that eye anymore. (not necessarily permanent, of course) |
Oh, and the reason it only happens in one eye? Your brain uses your "dominant" eye for the close-up focusing, allowing the other eye to relax. Keep in mind that that's just my (unprofessional) theory, based on some Internet research I did a year ago. It could be wrong. Also, I'm not sure if it's necessarily a bad thing. I can still see just fine as long as I'm not covering my "good" eye. If you start doing stuff like "cover up the bad eye when doing close-up stuff" you might end up hurting your other eye too! The best advice I can give is to start being aware of what you're doing to your eyes. Don't do things you feel are harmful. Beyond that, you're gonna need to get a professional opinion. |
Look at it this way. Much of what we perceive as three dimensional vision comes from disparity in the signals we receive in both eyes. We need binocular vision to get full depth perception. It is not a good thing when one eye is is suppressing the other. We can still see enough depth to function, but how much harder is it going to be to say, catch a ball? Drive? (It's very possible to drive well using only monocular depth cues, but it's much harder). |