xing3ds
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Nov 23, 2004
- Posts
- 175
- Likes
- 11
Quote:
sorry for my lack of knowledge in this area
Quote:
That is a very good point.
Again, I need to discuss the bit of this (either integrated 2ch amp or 5.1 receiver) with my gf's dad.
Quote:
I've looked on that one, it seems to be a good one.
Quote:
I will look on that cable's brand. and thanks for the inputs.
its really helpful
Originally Posted by ChicagoPhil you won't need both an integrated amp and a receiver... it's one or the other (or was i being too obtuse in reading your post?) |
sorry for my lack of knowledge in this area
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChicagoPhil an integrated will give more value in a 2 channel setup, but will be effectively wasted money when going to HT. so i would just get a good receiver to start with since you know that's where the system is headed. |
That is a very good point.
Again, I need to discuss the bit of this (either integrated 2ch amp or 5.1 receiver) with my gf's dad.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChicagoPhil consider the NAD T743, retail $699. it is 5.1 only |
I've looked on that one, it seems to be a good one.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChicagoPhil i think you can find a decent source and cables for $350. without getting into a debate about the absoulte value of cables, as part of a system at this combined price point, the bang for the buck is clearly in the speakers and amplifier (receiver). parts express (website direct) sells a house brand series of cables, named Dayton, that have solid construction and are reasonably priced. |
I will look on that cable's brand. and thanks for the inputs.
its really helpful