I saw the review comparing the Headtrip II Level II versus the Dragon Level II and perhaps this comparison is the best answer to my dilemma. I have a Quicksilver headphone amp with upgraded caps and NOS tubes driving my Kennerton Gjallarhorn GH50 JM Edition Mark 2 phones, 33 ohms, 116 dB/mW, so they are a really easy load. Heck, they can easily be driven by the soundcard in my laptop and by my iPhone6. I stream Qobuz into an Auralic Vega DAC.
I know from previous experience that there can be a striking difference in sound with different speaker amp designs I have owned: Solid-state muscle amps, small SS amps, big push-pull tube amps, small p-p tube amps, SETs, OTLs. My favorite of all time are some obscure but amazing Essence solid-state muscle amps with 10 MHz bandwidth. Yes, 10 MHz. This microwave technology is not supposed to work for audio but somehow it does.
So I wanted to hear sounds on the opposite ends of the sound spectrum as I have the Quicksilver that uses all tubes for the gain and output. For those who have experience with Wells Audio amps, which would be on the opposite end? The QS amp has the usual liquid, immediate, warm sound of tubes although I wouldn't characterize it as classic tube sound, i.e. lush and overly warm with flaccid bass; just on the warm and immediate side of neutral. Does the Dragon tilt toward the fast, transparent, spacious side of things? How would it compare to a SS muscle amp like the Pass Labs HPA-1, Enleum AMP-23R, Violectric V281, or Niimbus US4+? I would imagine the answer to be just to the warm side of neutral but does it do the transparency, speed, and spaciousness of SS muscle amps?
Thank you in advance.