Weekend Specials during Namm!

[Lil' Fish]

This weekend we are launching our Namm specials for everyone!

 

[Audio Addict]

@Lil' Fish why doesn't the descriptions always describe the driver components?

 

[Lil' Fish]

@Lil' Fish why doesn't the descriptions always describe the driver components?

Can you give me an example? Each descriptionhas the driver amounts and chart.

 

[Audio Addict]

Can you give me an example? Each descriptionhas the driver amounts and chart.

Like the Euphoria. I could not find the drivers components.

 

[jaker782]

Related to this discussion, can you confirm that the sound profile charts for the Euphoria and Nirvana are correct? It appears that the sub, bass, mid, and high levels are identical between the two which seems a little odd considering the 2 extra low drivers on the Nirvana. The Nirvana chart makes sense to me, but the same elevated sub and bass levels do not seem right for the Euphoria. It may be correct since this is just speculation and I have not heard either model, but the few reviews I've read seem to claim a more balanced signature than the elevated lows and recessed mid levels the chart indicates.

 

[Audio Addict]

Can you give me an example? Each descriptionhas the driver amounts and chart.

Like the Euphoria. I could not find the drivers components.

Nevermind, my phone was scrolling down far enough.

 

[Lil' Fish]

ame elevated sub and bass levels do not seem right for the Euphoria. It may be correct since this is just speculation and I have not heard either model, but the few reviews I've read seem to claim a more balanced signature than the elevated lows and recessed mid levels the chart indicates.

I see that. The levels should be a little closer, but the low end is still more forward than the mids and highs, in my opinion.
I used to be a Nirvana only fan, I like a warmer low end. Lately I have been playing with the Euphoria more and I really enjoy it with certain types of music.

 

[jaker782]

I see that. The levels should be a little closer, but the low end is still more forward than the mids and highs, in my opinion.
I used to be a Nirvana only fan, I like a warmer low end. Lately I have been playing with the Euphoria more and I really enjoy it with certain types of music.

I appreciate the response and don't disagree that the low end is likely more prominent than the mids and highs on the Euphoria, I just didn't think the lows would be that far out ahead (at the same levels as the Nirvana chart) especially since there are only 2 low drivers instead of the 4 on the Nirvana. I actually enjoy a warm signature as well as long as it doesn't overpower the midrange. I'm much more in favor of a balanced signature with slightly increased low end to add warmth, but not a V-shaped sound with noticeably recessed vocals. Since you have heard both, how would you describe the Euphoria compared to the Nirvana?

 

[Lil' Fish]

We decided to keep the Namm specials until this Sunday!!

@jaker782 The Euphoria is phenomenal and will take on anything you give it. It has an incredibly clear response. I really enjoy it. The Nirvana is just as clear, but with a punchier bass response. Both are extremely comfortable to wear for longer periods of time, especially with the ADEL module option. I hope this helps some, This is just my opinion on them.

 

[Pott]

I was at NAMM and spent some time by the InEarz both where I got some custom Euphorias; they treated everyone super nicely and I had a great time there (yes, even with goo in my ears!).
I actually only tested the 450s (which I really, really enjoyed) so the Euphorias are currently unknown quantity... I can't wait to have them around