- Joined
- Nov 23, 2013
- Posts
- 508
- Likes
- 2,176
8h a day! Woah, this really tells something.Ya I love mine. I probably log about 8 hours a day on them. It’s such a simple setup, too.
Glad you're enjoying it mate!
8h a day! Woah, this really tells something.Ya I love mine. I probably log about 8 hours a day on them. It’s such a simple setup, too.
I enjoy the Bravura very much but I would admit that the Raal SR1a is getting more head time of late as it is a very impressive listening experience.I've heard Bravura, Aperio and HE-1. HE-1 gets my pick for most natural, correct sound, but it sounded more cool and etched than natural/organic, running off a laptop USB. The core sound of both Warwicks is very similar(very high quality), but both also suffer from sharpness that's a no go for me. I have not heard Shang Sr(or Jr) yet, but I would take a RAAL(CA-1a+VM-1a) over all of these. The comfort of HE-1 is also way better than the Warwicks. The RAAL is the most impressive and powerful sounding headphone system I've ever heard. It's a monster truck.
What is it that the Raal does so much better than all of these mega buck TOTL headphones? Can you put it into words?I've heard Bravura, Aperio and HE-1. HE-1 gets my pick for most natural, correct sound, but it sounded more cool and etched than natural/organic, running off a laptop USB. The core sound of both Warwicks is very similar(very high quality), but both also suffer from sharpness that's a no go for me. I have not heard Shang Sr(or Jr) yet, but I would take a RAAL(CA-1a+VM-1a) over all of these. The comfort of HE-1 is also way better than the Warwicks. The RAAL is the most impressive and powerful sounding headphone system I've ever heard. It's a monster truck.
What amp? I don't think any come close to the VM-1a. Especially considering that you get SIX non-gimmick tunings PER RAAL headphone. That is an absurd value...I enjoy the Bravura very much but I would admit that the Raal SR1a is getting more head time of late as it is a very impressive listening experience.
It sounds very powerful. It handles the harsh treble intensity of Rob Zombie like there is no intensity, and just listenable smoothness. It has vivid, very dimensional imaging that made instruments in tracks(Ozzy) pop out and make all my hairs stand up like no other headphone at AXPONA or CanJam did. Nothing else was even close.What is it that the Raal does so much better than all of these mega buck TOTL headphones? Can you put it into words?
Off the 8-ohm speaker taps of an Eddie Current Studio B tube amp via the TI-1c interface + the newest Mitch filters.What amp? I don't think any come close to the VM-1a. Especially considering that you get SIX non-gimmick tunings PER RAAL headphone. That is an absurd value...
In addition to the response from @CT007 I’d summarize that, for me, the Raal headphones capture the hyper detail and speed of e-stats while (at least for the SR1a) presenting a very wide, speaker-like soundstage if the track calls for it. The Raal SR1a suffers for some from the same bass-light complaints as many e-stats. However, unlike many e-stats (Warwicks excluded) which require very expensive energizers like the Eksonic T2 or Aeras, BHSE, or Mjolnir Carbon to mitigate that default bass lean signature, the Raal’s base response can be fleshed out very nicely via much less expensive physical open baffle compensation amp input adapters and/or Roon compatible third party convolution filters.What is it that the Raal does so much better than all of these mega buck TOTL headphones? Can you put it into words?
You prefer SR over CA? Or haven't heard the CA yet? The ear flap effect and general fit of the SR was too gimmicky for me, just like my MySphere experience.SR1a
Haven’t tried the CA yet so wanted to limit my comments to what I’ve heard and/or have personally owned.You prefer SR over CA? Or haven't heard the CA yet? The ear flap effect and general fit of the SR was too gimmicky for me, just like my MySphere experience.