Yes and yes, mostly.
I didn't really word myself properly, but for me Audirvana has too much of a file explorer/finder look. Very 'utilitarian' and simple in it's actual design.
Where Zune in my opinion, has a 'utilitarian' and simple design which i find more intuitive and experiential.
I will attempt to explain myself:
audirvana - shows a ton of info in a rigid grid (title/artist/album/disc/genre/sample rate etc.)
- All info > All the time
Zune - does not show all info at once, instead visualises the album covers with large images grouped left and the containing tracks of the album selected to the right.
- The right info > at the right time?
I like this screen to compare Zune to Audirvana. Displaying artist/album/track in a more relevant grid which will graphically filter as you select artist>album>track. (at high resolutions - the album grid is immense)
I think Zune is more thoughtful in it's user interface, inferred hierarchy of the filters and lists, small transitional animations.
J. Allard and the team at Microsoft's now defunct Pioneer Studios, were doing some critically brilliant, though not commercially brilliant work with the Zune/Kin/Courier, it's a real shame Microsoft went in another direction. Much of their influence still comes through Windows 8/phone today if you look carefully.
but I come from a User interface/experience design background, so my view is therefore very skewed. Hopefully I made some sense