linuxworks
Member of the Trade: Sercona Audio
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2008
- Posts
- 3,456
- Likes
- 69
I'm looking at cmoy's article:
HeadWize - Project: An Acoustic Simulator for Headphone Amplifiers by Chu Moy
and I see that r1a and r1b are just 2 alternate R's to select the 'level' of crossfade.
so why not have a variable R there, perhaps even limited at both ends (ie, not '0..n').
have people done that? is it a waste of time? any other reason NOT to have a dual pot+R there?
I've seen some ebay amps that have 'variable crossfade'. are they doing this or something else?
HeadWize - Project: An Acoustic Simulator for Headphone Amplifiers by Chu Moy
and I see that r1a and r1b are just 2 alternate R's to select the 'level' of crossfade.
so why not have a variable R there, perhaps even limited at both ends (ie, not '0..n').
have people done that? is it a waste of time? any other reason NOT to have a dual pot+R there?
I've seen some ebay amps that have 'variable crossfade'. are they doing this or something else?