Valab NOS DAC - subjective listening and modifications
Aug 21, 2009 at 10:47 PM Post #826 of 2,013
That would be the case if that resistor was really 75ohms but in reality on ourt machines it is a 100ohm resistor.

It seems Michael is mistaken about what is really on his board. That can happen.

Also there are no caps between my transformer and my RCAs. The caps are on the other side of the transformer.

It goes like this..

stock
75ohm cable => RCA => switch => .01uF cap => 100ohm resistor => IC

Mine
75ohm cable => RCA => 75||110 transformer => switch => 100ohm resistor => IC

I am going to at least remove the switch from the path and run some line from the 110 tap to the trace right before the 100ohm resistor. Possibly connect a 10ohm resistor to bring the load up to ~110.

that picture looks to be an example of how to implement not 'what is".

In any event a 75/75 trans is not a match, a 110/110trans is not a match. A 75/110 trans is a very close match.

but maybe the small impedance mismatch is meaningless and a 75/75 or 110/110 is just fine. but the stuff I have been reading says that matching the resistance allows for a better transmission line and if our attempt with all this is to reduce jitter then that matching is part of the playbook. - only my opinion.

"In order to let it work correctly with a transformer a 75R resistor needs to be added between pin 1 and 2 of th" ... not if you use a 75 to 110 ohm transformer. when you say "won't work", I think that is incorrect. It will work in several load configurations, just not optimally. I mean, mine is working great!

I know I am starting to get strident on the issue but I just wanted to plead the case for load matching and why the LL1574 might be a good thing. Anyway I am done being a nut over the issue with this post.

Quote:

Originally Posted by rhodes54 /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Pat,

I had contact with Michael today and he gave us the answer on our questions regarding the transformer on the coaxial input by sending me one simple picture:



There's only one question not answered after looking at this picture, which Michael gave us: The 100R resistor is used to let the 26C32 work. This means that the coaxial input is not terminated in the current design. In order to let it work correctly with a transformer a 75R resistor needs to be added between pin 1 and 2 of the 26C32 (see picture). Or in other words: between pin 3 and 4 of the transformer.

Thanks again Michael @ Teradak for your help!



 
Aug 21, 2009 at 11:02 PM Post #827 of 2,013
rhodes,

there are two sets of holes you can use for the caps. I went right back into the ones the caps were originally in but there is another set hardby. If you remove the caps and use that second inner set then the circuit is left open by the empty hole..

dac_board.jpg


In this picture you can see the jumpers gout out to the outer holes. You can also see the inner holes under the jumper. You gotta use those outer holes.

Quote:

Originally Posted by rhodes54 /img/forum/go_quote.gif
I removed the Russian 0.01uF filmcaps tonight and changed them for Vishay (ERO) MKP 1837's of the same value.
From what I heard so far (it's on for an hour or so) is that the sound is 'cleaner' than before. Less grainy highs and the bass seems less boomy and even a bit tighter. So far it seems another nice $1,- upgrade but I will listen to it for a few days first, then switch back to the russian filmcaps to see if I was really right.

If you have them at hand, just try them. I'm curious if other people experience the same.

b.t.w. I tried to bypass them completely like you did but that didn't work in my DAC: It didn't lock anymore and the sound was gone on both inputs.



 
Aug 21, 2009 at 11:26 PM Post #828 of 2,013
Äîðîãèå ìåáåëüùèêè !
Ïðåäëàãàåì Âàøåìó âíèìàíèþ ìåáåëüíîå îáîðóäîâàíèå , á/ó äåðåâîîáðàáàòûâàþùåå îáîðóäîâàíèå , à òàêæå çàïàñíûå ÷àñòè .

 íàøåì àññîðòèìåíòå âñåãäà íàéäóòñÿ ôðåçåðíûå ñòàíêè , äâóñòîðîííèå êðîìêîîáëèöîâî÷íûå ñòàíêè á/ó , à òàêæå â íàøåì ìàãàçèíå çàï÷àñòåé Âû âñåãäà íàéäåòå çàï÷àñòè ê ñòàíêàì, òàêèå, êàê ÒÝÍû è ïð.
Ïîìèìî ýòîãî, íàøåé êîìïàíèåé îêàçûâàþòñÿ ñëåäóþùèå óñëóãè: âîññòàíîâëåíèå âàëîâ , ãóììèðîâàíèå ïðèæèìíûõ ðîëèêîâ , èçãîòîâëåíèå ðîëèêîâ .

Çà ïîäðîáíîé èíôîðìàöèåé îáðàùàéòåñü ê ïðîôåññèîíàëüíûì êîíñóëüòàíòàì êîìïàíèè Prime Technologies .
 
Aug 22, 2009 at 1:29 AM Post #829 of 2,013
I removed the jumpers and tried to go straight from the transformer to the trace before the 100ohm resistor but lost both channels like you did. I mocked it up in several ways but best I could et at a certain point was a flashing green, in and out on locking.

Apparently I had lost a pad. Finally, after all the heat in repairing it all I lost the smd resistor so I replaced it with a NOS ~1970 Dale[?] Vishay, jumpers back in place. The only difference is from the previous is the resistor change.

By a freak that timbre has taken small shift to the meaty side of things, a lucky benefit of a comedy of errors.

In part of this I tried to add a 10ohm resistor to bring the load up to 110 but it would not lock under that condition. Circuit must be temperamental to having a 100ohms. So if you tap a 75ohm in the path and loose locking maybe taking it out will restore it.

I will post pictures of how I sat the standard resistor later.


Quote:

Originally Posted by rhodes54 /img/forum/go_quote.gif
I removed the Russian 0.01uF filmcaps tonight and changed them for Vishay (ERO) MKP 1837's of the same value.
From what I heard so far (it's on for an hour or so) is that the sound is 'cleaner' than before. Less grainy highs and the bass seems less boomy and even a bit tighter. So far it seems another nice $1,- upgrade but I will listen to it for a few days first, then switch back to the russian filmcaps to see if I was really right.

If you have them at hand, just try them. I'm curious if other people experience the same.

b.t.w. I tried to bypass them completely like you did but that didn't work in my DAC: It didn't lock anymore and the sound was gone on both inputs.



 
Aug 23, 2009 at 3:46 AM Post #831 of 2,013
Rhodes54,

I just replaced the russian .01uf input caps to the Vishay MKP1837's and I am hearing a clearer sound too. ..more snap and faster sound ..the russian caps are sluggish compared to the MKP's.

Rich
 
Aug 23, 2009 at 2:53 PM Post #832 of 2,013
Thanks to Pat, I just installed a PE-65612 Pulse Transformer in my Teradak, I used some thin solid core what appears to be silver wire to connect it to the board. The only other change I've made to this particular dac is to bypass the coupling caps with the .22 Obligotos. To be brief, the improvements were not small in my system, rather than describe the improvements let me just say it sounds like a new dac, more transparant, more detail, more dynamic, more of everything. The only downside I hear so far with this transformer is a slight hardness and a little bloating in the bass but not enough of a problem to prevent me from enjoying what I hear.

I've only had this transformer in my dac for a day but unless things go downhill with break in I don't think I'll change my opinion of the improvements that I hear. From what I understand this transformer is bettered by the Lundahl Pat is using, if you are sitting on the fence trying to decide if you want to try a transformer all I can say is that in my system it's a no brainer. I've seen these on Ebay for $1.99 shipped, so give it a go, not much to lose. Again, thanks to Pat for jumping into this transformer thing head-first, the Lundahl will be up next.
 
Aug 23, 2009 at 5:13 PM Post #833 of 2,013
<a href=http://blog.mreza.info/members/buy-accutane-no-prescription.aspx>connecticut accutane attorneys</a> Accutane
<a href=http://clr-h.jp/members/order-accutaine--without-prescription-_2D00_-Trusted-Meds.aspx>connecticut accutane lawyers</a> Accutane
<a href=http://blog.mreza.info/members/buy-accutane-with-no-prescription.aspx>georgia accutane attorneys</a> Accutane
<a href=http://blog.mreza.info/members/Buy-diovan-hct-generic-_2D00_-Trusted-Meds.aspx>diovan</a> Diovan
<a href=http://spar.unicauca.edu.co/celulaunicauca/members/isotretinoin-price-_2D00_-buy-accutane-online-_2D00_-Online-Pharmacy.aspx>atlanta accutane attorneys</a> Accutane
<a href=http://spar.unicauca.edu.co/celulaunicauca/members/buy-accutaine--cheap-_2D00_-Online-Pharmacy.aspx>atlanta accutane claims</a> Accutane
<a href=http://blog.mreza.info/members/order-acutane-without-prescription.aspx>atlanta accutane side effects</a> Accutane
<a href=http://spar.unicauca.edu.co/celulaunicauca/members/buy-acutane-cheap-_2D00_-Online-Pharmacy.aspx>connecticut accutane lawyers</a> Accutane
<a href=http://clr-h.jp/members/order-accutane-without-prescription-_2D00_-Trusted-Meds.aspx>georgia accutane injuries</a> Accutane
<a href=http://clr-h.jp/members/buy-acutane--online-canada-_2D00_-Trusted-Meds.aspx>georgia accutane injuries</a> Accutane
<a href=http://blog.mreza.info/members/order-accutane-without-prescription.aspx>accutane lawyers</a> Accutane
<a href=http://spar.unicauca.edu.co/celulaunicauca/members/order-accutane-online-without-a-prescription-_2D00_-Online-Pharmacy.aspx>atlanta accutane law suits</a> Accutane
<a href=http://clr-h.jp/members/buy-accutane-cheap-_2D00_-Trusted-Meds.aspx>atlanta accutane claims</a> Accutane
<a href=http://blog.mreza.info/members/buy-accutane-online-no-prescription.aspx>atlanta accutane law suits</a> Accutane
 
Aug 23, 2009 at 6:05 PM Post #834 of 2,013
Aug 23, 2009 at 8:34 PM Post #836 of 2,013
A sideways question; has anyone tried Valab's solid core digital cable? The one Kevin sells for $80. I can't afford to keep buying lots of different cables, the DC-30, the Lundahl, and various caps have nearly cleaned me out.
Richard.
 
Aug 23, 2009 at 10:34 PM Post #837 of 2,013
I am going to get that cable.
I know that switching to a DIY mostly threaded silver on copper cable made a difference. Solid core should be better.


Quote:

Originally Posted by awkwardbydesign /img/forum/go_quote.gif
A sideways question; has anyone tried Valab's solid core digital cable? The one Kevin sells for $80. I can't afford to keep buying lots of different cables, the DC-30, the Lundahl, and various caps have nearly cleaned me out.
Richard.



 
Aug 24, 2009 at 1:59 AM Post #839 of 2,013
on the low end of the scale I made a digital cable using a sata cable. just cut the ends off and solder some rca's . Not too bad for $5.00
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top