V-MODA VAMP VERZA/METALLO: Discussion/Feedback, Reviews, Pics, Crowdsourcing Ideas
Aug 12, 2013 at 10:34 AM Post #856 of 1,343
THX!
 
Aug 12, 2013 at 10:55 AM Post #858 of 1,343
Quote:

 
Also, it is ridiculously simple to operate.  So the manual really isn't even necessary.  Thanks for the link though, I didn't know that was out there! 
 
Aug 12, 2013 at 11:03 AM Post #859 of 1,343
Quote:
 
Also, it is ridiculously simple to operate.  So the manual really isn't even necessary.  Thanks for the link though, I didn't know that was out there! 

NP, but instead I found the block diagram most useful.
 
Aug 12, 2013 at 1:18 PM Post #864 of 1,343
Aug 12, 2013 at 1:28 PM Post #865 of 1,343
Aug 12, 2013 at 2:18 PM Post #868 of 1,343
Quote:
Has that been confirmed? V-MODA only lists the power output at 32 Ω.
The JDS Labs C5 offers 49 mW at 300 Ω. o.0

Are you sure it is 49mW?  I am not sure what happened and I could be wrong, but I can't get the same calculations listed on their spec list...
 
Off topic and math heavy:
 
Formulas:
 
Vrms = 0.707 x Vmax; Vmax = Vrms / 0.707
Vpp = 0.3535 x Vrms
V = IR; I = V/R
P = IV = (V/R) x V = V^2 / R
So Pmax = (Vrms/0.707)^2 / R
and Pavg = Vrms^2 /R
 
Here is what I am getting for the C5 based on their specs, and you may notice something is not right with the numbers at 150 ohms:
 
R Vrms Vpp Vmax Pmax Pavg
32 1.010 0.357 1.429 0.064 0.032
150 3.337 1.180 4.720 0.149 0.074
600 4.146 1.466 5.864 0.057 0.029
 
Aug 12, 2013 at 2:24 PM Post #869 of 1,343
Quote:
Well i looked at both and Verza has 150mw x 2 out of USB and 130mw x 2 apple specific at greater than 32 ohms.

The jds labds rates in 4.146 Vrmsat 600ohms

150 mW * 32 / 300 = 16 mW and only 9mW at 600 ohms.  Either way the C5 has way more power.
 
Aug 12, 2013 at 3:16 PM Post #870 of 1,343
Quote:
Quote:
Has that been confirmed? V-MODA only lists the power output at 32 Ω.
The JDS Labs C5 offers 49 mW at 300 Ω. o.0

Are you sure it is 49mW?  I am not sure what happened and I could be wrong, but I can't get the same calculations listed on their spec list...
 
Off topic and math heavy:
 
Formulas:
 
Vrms = 0.707 x Vmax; Vmax = Vrms / 0.707
Vpp = 0.3535 x Vrms
V = IR; I = V/R
P = IV = (V/R) x V = V^2 / R
So Pmax = (Vrms/0.707)^2 / R
and Pavg = Vrms^2 /R
 
Here is what I am getting for the C5 based on their specs, and you may notice something is not right with the numbers at 150 ohms:
 
R Vrms Vpp Vmax Pmax Pavg
32 1.010 0.357 1.429 0.064 0.032
150 3.337 1.180 4.720 0.149 0.074
600 4.146 1.466 5.864 0.057 0.029

No I'm not sure, but this person might be. The calculation for the power at 32 Ω was nearly spot-on. That user is also an active poster in the sound science thread so I feel confident with the calculations. But no I'm not 100% certain.
http://www.head-fi.org/t/647838/jds-labs-c5-portable-amplifier-appreciation-discussion-thread-check-1st-post-for-review/450#post_9233131
Quote:
I get these results:
Code:
 16 ohms: V = 0.509 Vrms, Ipeak = 45.0 mA, P = 16.2 mW 32 ohms: V = 1.018 Vrms, Ipeak = 45.0 mA, P = 32.4 mW 50 ohms: V = 1.591 Vrms, Ipeak = 45.0 mA, P = 50.6 mW 62 ohms: V = 1.973 Vrms, Ipeak = 45.0 mA, P = 62.8 mW 150 ohms: V = 3.337 Vrms, Ipeak = 31.5 mA, P = 74.2 mW 300 ohms: V = 3.836 Vrms, Ipeak = 18.1 mA, P = 49.0 mW 600 ohms: V = 4.146 Vrms, Ipeak = 9.8 mA, P = 28.6 mW

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top