I recently found out there are some products that offer two DACs. How much audiophile bullcrap is this? After the first DAC converts the signal from digital to analog, the second one can't possibly do anything else, so what is the point?
Honestly, no idea if it's foolery, if it makes sense or not.
From the description of my NuForce icon HDP:
The DAC chip consists of four internal 24/192kHz DACs that provide a fully differential and balanced output. The differential signal's DC offset operates without a need for decoupling caps.
DAC chips are expensive. I don't think anyone would just put redundant chips into a device if the same sound quality could be achieved with one.
The top speed of the cars in my household is 250 kph / 155mph and the other one is 272kph / 169mph the legal speed limit in the country I live in is 120kph. That is the same "over-engineering" but believe me, even getting to 120 with the former car is pure fun. 55horsepower would probably be enough and the same speed of 120kph would be achieved with 3 cylinders but it SOUNDS better with 6 or 8, especially when they are arranged flat
Maybe my future car has no cylinders and drives electric, but the point I tried to make is: you can achieve something in different ways. There might be a 4 cylinder 2 liter twin-turbo with the same horsepower than a 5.7 liter V8. So maybe 4 DACs of one kind result in the same sound quality than 1 super-turbo one, LOL or maybe they are just show and really make no difference. Somehow it seems the producers are not really keen on coming up with a standard measurement to compare this kind of "performance"...
Originally Posted by Koolpep /img/forum/go_quote.gif
55horsepower would probably be enough and the same speed of 120kph would be achieved with 3 cylinders but it SOUNDS better with 6 or 8, especially when they are arranged flat
That all depends on your drag coefficient, but any car that has 55HP with a 3 cylinder engine has a pretty high drag coefficient and this would not be enough to get up to 120kph.
I know they would. The audio world has a lot of expensive things aimed at sound quality with absolutely 0 scientifical backing, but people believe it. A DAC is more than able to decode the max audio output, 1,411 kbps, into proper channels.
Ignoring separation (which can be good enough on a stereo DAC chip to be meaningless) there are some DAC chips that only come with 1 channel on a chip.
Fact:
GM 1.0 litre ecotec engine, 3 cylinders, 55hp top speed 132kph, I drove plenty of cars in europe with 45-55 hp (oh yes, everybody starts small). They all had no problem exceeding 120 kph with relative ease. Don't know how you calculated the drag coefficient, but you are wrong, Sir.
Using just one puny DAC is stupid.
Now, seriously, why is it stupid to have 2? I mean, I really don't know. Maybe it's hokus pokus, but if you state that it doesn't make sense or is stupid, could you elaborate why?
I couldn't care less if my DAC has half a chip, 2 or 16 chips, if it sounds good.
Some DACs are based on a differential design i.e for each channel (or both) the signal is decoded independently twice by different chips and the two signals are compared, if there is a difference it does something or other - my old Rotel had two sets of differential chips - I have no idea if it made any difference at all !
My second car in 1986 was a 1984 (A Reg) Fiat UNO 55S (1.1 L, 55hp) and I could cruise at 90MPH or about 144KPH - the spec'd top speed was 93MPH but I never managed to get that, possibly the prior owner had thrashed it a bit.....
Depending on the DAC, it will have higher SNR when used in mono than stereo. Having one for each channal makes sence in this type of installation because it gives the device an overall lower noise floor. Anything other than that reason alone is marketing foolery.
This is taken from the specs of a Wolfson 8741 DAC:
If me, for self defense of an idea, if the OP because he doesn't know:
The random noise of paralleled devices is reduced by a factor of sqrt(n) where n is the number of devices...
Distortion depends on the circuits. Id bet for improvements most of the time.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
but believe me, even getting to 120 with the former car is pure fun. 55horsepower would probably be enough and the same speed of 120kph would be achieved with 3 cylinders but it SOUNDS better with 6 or 8, especially when they are arranged flat 
